STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG

[Niseem <niseemmagdy AT yahoo.com>]

Hi ShinIchi and All,

    Thank you for your sign-off. 
    I think that my abstract title is best describes the content as its.

Thanks,
Niseem

On 2/3/21 9:36 PM, ShinIchi Esumi via Star-fcv-l wrote:

      Dear Niseem (and Chunjian)

I also sign off your nice abstract with one request to make the title more clear what is discussed 

in the talk, where the contents of your talk seems to be more focused on the rho and c2, which 

is somewhat different from Chunjian’s abstract is more focused on mean pt fluctuation, while the 

both title sounds very similar “transverse momentum correlation (or fluctuation)", so please include 

rho and c2 or please try to make a clearer distinction in the title in order to make both accepted 

as a talk. 

Best regards, ShinIchi

2021/02/04 2:03、Niseem via Star-fcv-l <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov>のメール:

Hi Jiangyong,

Thanks for the nice comments.

Please find the updated abstract at the same link,
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/53482

I think that both sets of results will guide the extraction of \eta/s. I rephrased the abstract to reflect the value of each set of measurements. 

Thanks,
Niseem

On 2/3/21 7:43 AM, Jiangyong Jia via Star-fcv-l wrote:

Hi, Niseem,

Nice abstract 

1. Please mention STAR in title

2. The scope of the abstract is quite broad, I would suggest you to focus on the C2(Δη,Δφ) in BES.  Since there might still be systematic checks to be done, for example how stable are the results if you vary the pair cuts, this aught to be one sources of uncertainty.  Also the vn-pT correlation is a bit distraction to your eta/s focus, I suggest you just show your previous prelim results. 

Cheers,

Jiangyong

On 2/2/21 10:32 AM, Niseem via Star-fcv-l wrote:

Hi Prithwish,

Thanks for the nice comments.

Please find the updated abstract at the same link,

https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/53482

For your comments,

It is not clear what this new observable is C2(Δη,Δφ) does not clearly indicate that you're measuring transverse momentum correlations.  >> It's written that C2(Δη, Δφ) is the “longitudinal two-particle momentum correlations”

Do you think you'll be done with systematics by CPOD
>>The standard systematics i.e. tracks and events variations exist, currently along with others we are working on the systematics associated with the extraction of the \eta/s

I remember you looked at \rho for three energies:  https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/Flow_PT_5.pdf  Did you look at all other energies for 200-11.5 GeV, if not do you plan to update soon ? Or I missed it?  >>I’m working on including some of the lower beam energies, however, I rephrased the sentence to reflect the energy range for the different measurements 

Thanks,
Niseem

On 2/2/21 7:59 AM, Prithwish Tribedy via Star-fcv-l wrote:

Hi Niseem, 
  Looks good, please consider the following suggestions. I'll sign off once these are included. 

"The beam-energy of the transverse momentum correlations; Implication for the η/s 
extraction"  -->  "The beam-energy dependence of the transverse momentum correlations and implication for the η/s 
extraction" 
"The ongoing heavy-ion programs’ primary aim is to" 
-->  "One of the primary aim of the ongoing heavy-ion programs is to" 
Remove "formed in high-energy heavy ion collisions" 

"further constraints for more robust extractions of η/s(T)"  -->  "further constraints on the extractions of η/s(T)" 

"required for the initial-state and the T" 
-->  "required for the uncertainties on the initial-state and the T" 
"dependence of η/s.The recent" 
-->  "dependence of η/s.(ADD SPACE)The recent" 

"correlations, C2(Δη,Δφ)[1,2], and" 
-->  "correlations, C2(Δη,Δφ)(ADD SPACE)[1,2], and" 


"add an additional constrain" 
-->  "add additional constraints" 


"are compared with similar studies" 
-->  "will be compared to similar measurements" 

"to several theoretical calculations" 
-->  "to theoretical calculations" 

Some general comments/question: 

It is not clear what this new observable is C2(Δη,Δφ) does not clearly indicate that you're measuring transverse momentum correlations. 

Do you think you'll be done with systematics by CPOD 

I remember you looked at \rho for three energies: 
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/Flow_PT_5.pdf 
Did you look at all other energies for 200-11.5 GeV, if not do you plan to update soon ? Or I missed it? 


Best,  Prithwish 

On 2021-01-29 10:16, webmaster--- via Star-fcv-l wrote: 

Dear star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov members, 
Niseem Magdy Abdelwahab Abdelrahman (niseemmagdy AT yahoo.com) has submitted a  material for a review, please have a look:  https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/53482 
---  If you have any problems with the review process, please contact  webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov  _______________________________________________  Star-fcv-l mailing list  Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov  https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l 

_______________________________________________ 
Star-fcv-l mailing list 
Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov 
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l 

_______________________________________________
Star-fcv-l mailing list
Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l

_______________________________________________
Star-fcv-l mailing list
Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l

_______________________________________________ Star-fcv-l mailing list
Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l

_______________________________________________
Star-fcv-l mailing list
Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l