STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG

[Prithwish Tribedy <ptribedy AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>]

Hi Kishora, ShinIchi,
 Sorry, I was confused. I thought Kishora was thinking that we have a 
parallel session at the analysis meeting and wanted to present and 
update and paper proposal. I didn't realize he was proposing to give a 
FCV highlight talk on v1. Maybe he should clarify.

Best,
Prithwish


On 2021-06-25 12:02, ShinIchi Esumi via Star-fcv-l wrote:
> Dear Kishora, (Prithwish and all)
> What would you say, Kishora? I’m OK either way, whether I give a 
> summary talk
> on recent FCV presentations or you give your paper proposal of 
> systematic v1
> analysis as a function of beam energy, centrality, pT and rapidity for
> identified
> particles, which would be a quite good topical talk from FCV as well.
> Best regards, ShinIchi
>
> > On Jun 25, 2021, at 20:36, Prithwish Tribedy 
> > <ptribedy AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Kishora, ShinIchi,
> > I think it’s better to discuss this paper proposal in a regular PWG 
> > meeting. We
> > skip our pwg meeting for next week and can put it in the agenda for 
> > the following week.
> > Best, Prithwish
> >
> > On 2021-06-25 07:00, ShinIchi Esumi wrote:
> > > Dear Kishore
> > > Since there was no specific suggestion about the topical talk from 
> > > the FCV in the
> > > last few PWG meetings, I was thinking to give a summary talk from the 
> > > recent FCV
> > > PWG meetings at the end of the plenary session in the STAR analysis 
> > > meeting
> > > allocated on Wednesday 30/Jun at 10:40 am for 20 min. But it could be 
> > > a good
> > > idea for you to give this paper proposal talk in the plenary session, 
> > > if both Jiangyong
> > > and Prithwish agree, of course, if it’s also OK with you, too. If 
> > > that’s OK with you all,
> > > I would ask the management to allocate your talk there. I’ve just 
> > > seen your last
> > > presentation on November 25, 2020 at the PWG, which was already quite 
> > > in good
> > > shape in terms of the analysis, so I guess we will agree for you to 
> > > go ahead, so it
> > > would also be a good topical talk from FCV during the coming STAR 
> > > analysis meeting.
> > > Although Jiangyong will not join the analysis meeting, but he can 
> > > comment in the
> > > next PWG meetings, if he has any suggestion. You might also not have 
> > > very long
> > > time to explain about the details of your analysis, since it is 
> > > limited in 20min, but
> > > you could always come back again in the PWG later, if needed. So 
> > > shall we do this
> > > (for you to give the plenary talk on your proposal in the analysis 
> > > meeting)?
> > > Best regards, ShinIchi
> > > > On Jun 25, 2021, at 18:53, knayak <knayak AT mail.ccnu.edu.cn> wrote:
> > > > Dear Conveners,
> > > > I would like to give the paper proposal “Directed flow of identified 
> > > > hadrons in Au+Au
> > > > collisions at 19.6, 27 and 54.4 GeV in STAR” in the "STAR Analysis 
> > > > Meeting”,
> > > > Jun/28-30 (Mon-Wed) 9:00am-11:30am,
> > > > (https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/conference/timetable/talk/55171).
> > > > Could you please let me know whether it is the right platform or I 
> > > > need to give
> > > > the proposal in the next FCV PWG wednesday meeting? Thank you.
> > > > Thanks, With best regards, Kishora
>
> _______________________________________________
> Star-fcv-l mailing list
> Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l