star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG
List archive
Re: [Star-fcv-l] Request for PID v1 paper proposal
- From: "knayak"<knayak AT mail.ccnu.edu.cn>
- To: "ShinIchi Esumi"<esumi.shinichi.gn AT u.tsukuba.ac.jp>, "Chirality and Vorticity PWG" "<star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov>, "Prithwish Tribedy"<ptribedy AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>
- Subject: Re: [Star-fcv-l] Request for PID v1 paper proposal
- Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2021 10:02:18 +0500
Dear Prithwish,
I am not proposing any FCV highlight talk on v1 in the STAR Analysis meeting.
I was trying to know, whether it is possible to give a paper proposal of my PID v1 analysis in this meeting.
I am sorry for creating confusion. I think this is not the right meeting for a paper proposal,
so I would like to give my paper proposal in a FCV PWG meeting.
Thank you very much.
Thanks,
With best regards,
Kishora
Original Message
Sender: Prithwish Tribedy via Star-fcv-l<star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Recipient: ShinIchi Esumi<esumi.shinichi.gn AT u.tsukuba.ac.jp>; Chirality and Vorticity PWG" <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Date: Friday, Jun 25, 2021 21:59
Subject: Re: [Star-fcv-l] Request for PID v1 paper proposal
Hi Kishora, ShinIchi, Sorry, I was confused. I thought Kishora was thinking that we have a parallel session at the analysis meeting and wanted to present and update and paper proposal. I didn't realize he was proposing to give a FCV highlight talk on v1. Maybe he should clarify. Best, Prithwish On 2021-06-25 12:02, ShinIchi Esumi via Star-fcv-l wrote: > Dear Kishora, (Prithwish and all) > What would you say, Kishora? I’m OK either way, whether I give a > summary talk > on recent FCV presentations or you give your paper proposal of > systematic v1 > analysis as a function of beam energy, centrality, pT and rapidity for > identified > particles, which would be a quite good topical talk from FCV as well. > Best regards, ShinIchi > >> On Jun 25, 2021, at 20:36, Prithwish Tribedy >> <ptribedy AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov> wrote: >> >> Hi Kishora, ShinIchi, >> I think it’s better to discuss this paper proposal in a regular PWG >> meeting. We >> skip our pwg meeting for next week and can put it in the agenda for >> the following week. >> Best, Prithwish >> >> On 2021-06-25 07:00, ShinIchi Esumi wrote: >>> Dear Kishore >>> Since there was no specific suggestion about the topical talk from >>> the FCV in the >>> last few PWG meetings, I was thinking to give a summary talk from the >>> recent FCV >>> PWG meetings at the end of the plenary session in the STAR analysis >>> meeting >>> allocated on Wednesday 30/Jun at 10:40 am for 20 min. But it could be >>> a good >>> idea for you to give this paper proposal talk in the plenary session, >>> if both Jiangyong >>> and Prithwish agree, of course, if it’s also OK with you, too. If >>> that’s OK with you all, >>> I would ask the management to allocate your talk there. I’ve just >>> seen your last >>> presentation on November 25, 2020 at the PWG, which was already quite >>> in good >>> shape in terms of the analysis, so I guess we will agree for you to >>> go ahead, so it >>> would also be a good topical talk from FCV during the coming STAR >>> analysis meeting. >>> Although Jiangyong will not join the analysis meeting, but he can >>> comment in the >>> next PWG meetings, if he has any suggestion. You might also not have >>> very long >>> time to explain about the details of your analysis, since it is >>> limited in 20min, but >>> you could always come back again in the PWG later, if needed. So >>> shall we do this >>> (for you to give the plenary talk on your proposal in the analysis >>> meeting)? >>> Best regards, ShinIchi >>>> On Jun 25, 2021, at 18:53, knayak <knayak AT mail.ccnu.edu.cn> wrote: >>>> Dear Conveners, >>>> I would like to give the paper proposal “Directed flow of identified >>>> hadrons in Au+Au >>>> collisions at 19.6, 27 and 54.4 GeV in STAR” in the "STAR Analysis >>>> Meeting”, >>>> Jun/28-30 (Mon-Wed) 9:00am-11:30am, >>>> (https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/conference/timetable/talk/55171). >>>> Could you please let me know whether it is the right platform or I >>>> need to give >>>> the proposal in the next FCV PWG wednesday meeting? Thank you. >>>> Thanks, With best regards, Kishora > > _______________________________________________ > Star-fcv-l mailing list > Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l _______________________________________________ Star-fcv-l mailing list Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
-
Re: [Star-fcv-l] Request for PID v1 paper proposal,
Prithwish Tribedy, 06/25/2021
-
Re: [Star-fcv-l] Request for PID v1 paper proposal,
ShinIchi Esumi, 06/25/2021
- Re: [Star-fcv-l] Request for PID v1 paper proposal, Prithwish Tribedy, 06/25/2021
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [Star-fcv-l] Request for PID v1 paper proposal, knayak, 06/26/2021
-
Re: [Star-fcv-l] Request for PID v1 paper proposal,
ShinIchi Esumi, 06/25/2021
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.