STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG

[Roy Lacey <roy.lacey AT stonybrook.edu>]

Fuquiang,

                 Your slide is egregiously incorrect, and you should stop this recurring nonsense... Respectfully, for the relevant signal level, your correlator can only measure noise, which is a well-known fact.

I have nothing more to say on this, but you can certainly read the impending papers.

Regards

Roy

On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 3:29 PM Wang, Fuqiang via Star-fcv-l <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:

Hi ShinIchi,

I have a slide on the R vs. Delta gamma variable. I think it would make the talk less clear if I include R2 data. Moreover, I'm not even sure if we can show R2 data at this moment before the retracted paper is cleared.

For the SBF and Dumbbell data, it's not all clear to me what the message we may draw at this point. It may require more studies and model comparisons in the future to reach a clearer conclusion. So I'd prefer not to include those results.

Thanks,
Fuqiang



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Star-fcv-l <star-fcv-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov> On Behalf Of ShinIchi Esumi
> via Star-fcv-l
> Sent: Friday, October 29, 2021 12:48 AM
> To: STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
> Subject: Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Fuqiang Wang for Chirality
> Workshop 2021 got commented by Fuqiang Wang
>
> Dear Fuqiang
> Thank you very much for the very nice summary of CME activities from the early
> days up to now in STAR. I see this is still quite challenging to get the signal out. I
> do not know this talk is to present all the star activities on this front or to show
> your perspectives, but since this is (for the STAR collaboration) as I see in your
> title page, I thought it would be nice for you to touch/add a few more
> trials/plots as we have some more preliminary results on R2, SBF and Dumbbell
> variables, where they are integrating charge asymmetry within an event in stead
> of taking all the pair combinations of all the events, where I still hope that we
> might have different sensitivities between different methods on the various
> different types of signals, especially between "large domain and less frequent”
> or “small domain and more frequent” signal cases, even for the same signal
> fraction, where you might have some other opinions on this, though. Of course,
> is up to you to decide including some more plots in your talk or not. Anyway, this
> is already very nice talk, so I sign off, (if needed). Thank you.
> Best regards, ShinIchi
>
> > On Oct 29, 2021, at 5:14, webmaster--- via Star-fcv-l <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
> wrote:
> >
> > Dear star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
> >
> > Fuqiang Wang ( fqwang AT purdue.edu ) has commented on a material
> > originally submitted by Fuqiang Wang ( fqwang AT purdue.edu ) at
> > https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/presentations/chirality-workshop-2021
> > /search-cme-auau-collisions-star
> >
> > Comment:
> > I've updated the slides. I added a slide on the new 27 GeV data. Added
> > a backup slide on CMW data.
> >
> > ---
> > If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
> > webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
> > _______________________________________________
> > Star-fcv-l mailing list
> > Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
>
> _______________________________________________
> Star-fcv-l mailing list
> Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
_______________________________________________
Star-fcv-l mailing list
Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l