STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG

[ShinIchi Esumi <esumi.shinichi.gn AT u.tsukuba.ac.jp>]

Dear Shengli (and Prithwish)

The followings are comments on your merged talk abstract from conveners. 

Best regards, Jiangyong, Prithwish and ShinIchi

---------------------------------------

Jiangyong 

Title-->remove "in varying system sizes"

L2 in the community of relativistic collisions --> in the heavy ion community.

L15 We exploit the advantage of wide mid-rapidity acceptance of Time Projection Chamber

(-1< η <1) of STAR to facilitate apples-to-apples comparison with boost-invariant model predictions. In addition, we make... --> In addition to the results obtained from the mid-rapidity acceptance (|eta|<1), we also use the Event Plane detector over 2.1<|eta|<5.1 to investigate

L21-24.  How about: The photo-nuclear gamma+Au candidate events in Au+Au collisions were selected by requiring a single neutron hit on one side of the Zero-degree calorimeter.

 

L27 how about "to further improve the purity of gamma+Au events.

L29 harmonic anisotropy coefficients...--> v_n coefficients in gamma+Au events.

Prithwish:

The abstract is a bit long. 

Combine 1st and 2nd sentence: 

“The origin of collectivity in small collision systems is one of the most debated topics in the community of relativistic collisions. A satisfactory microscopic explanation of how collectivity originates and evolves with collision system size is still outstanding” 

→

“A satisfactory explanation of how collectivity originates and evolves with collision system size is a highly debated topic in the community of relativistic collisions.” 

“To address this problem” → “To address this topic” 

“The pseudorapidity distribution of particles is strongly asymmetric in these interactions and the wide acceptance coverage of the STAR detector using TPC, Beam-Beam Counter and Vertex 27 Position Detector is exploited to improve the purity of the γ+Au-rich samples.” 

→

“We further exploit the combination of STAR forward detectors to trigger on pseudorapidity asymmetry to improve the purity of the γ+Au-rich samples.”

ShinIchi

L1-15: Can you make it short at least about a half of this first part. 

L17: “apples-to-apples comparison with boost…” part is not clear... compared to what? Phenix?

Use of EPD for isobar data (including wide TPC acceptance part), or at least, photo-nuclear part would be separated as a new paragraph. 

---------------------------------------

On Nov 17, 2021, at 4:49, webmaster--- via Star-fcv-l <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:

Dear star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,

Shengli Huang (shengli.huang AT stonybrook.edu) has submitted a material for a  
review, please have a look:
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/57268

---
If you have any problems with the review process, please contact  
webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
_______________________________________________
Star-fcv-l mailing list
Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l