STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG

[Prithwish Tribedy <ptribedy AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>]

Hi Kosuke,
   I would then change the sentence on backup slide 16:
"About 90% pile up events would be removed"
-->
"About 90% of the pile up events would be removed using our technique"

Best,
Prithwish


On 2022-03-06 00:04, kokubo wrote:
> Dear Prithwish,
>
> Thank you very much for the comments.
> I have implemented them in the slides.
> The updated version can be found in the link below.
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/presentations/JPS-2022-Spring/Global-polarization-Lambda-hyperons-Beam-Energy-Scan-II-RHIC-STAR-0
>
> The below is answer to your question.
> > "About 90% pile up events would be removed."  Is this the right number 
> > ?
> > I am confused. We normally remove 0.5% of the events as pile-up. What
> > is this 90% ?
> If we assume the event that of multiplicity is larger than 300 is pile
> up event, about 90% of these are removed by this pile up rejection.
> So we mention that "About 90% pile up events would be removed" here.
>
> Best regards,
> Kosuke
>
> 2022-03-05 20:03 に Prithwish Tribedy via Star-fcv-l さんは書きました:
> > Dear Kosuke,
> >   Nice slides. Please include the following minor comments. With these
> > included I sign-off.
> >
> > Title:
> > "Global polarization of Λ hyperons in Beam Energy Scan II at 
> > RHIC-STAR"
> > -->
> > "Global polarization of Λ hyperons in RHIC Beam Energy Scan II from 
> > STAR"
> >
> > Everywhere:
> > "Abdallah, M. S. et al., PRC104.L061901 (2021)"
> > -->
> > "M. S. Abdallah et al. (STAR Collaboration)
> > Phys. Rev. C 104, L061901"
> >
> >
> > slide#7:
> > "vacuum pipe" --> "beam pipe"
> >
> > slide#9 (everywhere)
> > "topological cut" --> "topological cuts"
> >
> >
> > slide#10:
> > "The increasing trend is observed at √s_{NN}=2.4 GeV to 5.02 GeV"
> > -->
> > "The increasing trend with the decrease of collisions energy persists
> > down to √s_{NN}=2.4 GeV"
> >
> >
> > slide#13:
> > "One might expect ..." --> "Possible expectations:"
> > "No significant p_T dependence"
> > -->
> > "No significant p_T dependence seen in data"
> >
> > Summary slide:
> > "We presented Λ global polarization"-->"We presented measurements of Λ
> > global polarization"
> >
> > "with fixed-target configuration" --> "from STAR in fixed target mode"
> >
> > "There are no significant rapidity and  dependences" --> "No
> > significant dependence on p_T and rapidity observed"
> >
> > Backup slide 16:
> > Put more information on the plots such as collision system, energy.
> >
> > "Pile up events are removed using TOF start timing(T0)."
> > -->
> > "Pile up events are removed using start timing (T0) estimated using 
> > TOF and TPC"
> >
> > "About 90% pile up events would be removed."  Is this the right number 
> > ?
> > I am confused. We normally remove 0.5% of the events as pile-up. What
> > is this 90% ?
> >
> > slide #17:
> > Put more information on the plots such as collision system, energy.
> >
> > "Extract the polarization signal"
> > -->
> > "Extraction of the polarization signal"
> >
> >
> > Best,
> > Prithwish
> >
> >
> >
> > On 2022-03-03 08:35, webmaster--- via Star-fcv-l wrote:
> > > Dear star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
> > >
> > > Kosuke Okubo (det.billups.0917 AT icloud.com) has submitted a material 
> > > for a
> > > review, please have a look:
> > > https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/58627
> > >
> > > ---
> > > If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
> > > webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Star-fcv-l mailing list
> > > Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
> > _______________________________________________
> > Star-fcv-l mailing list
> > Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l