STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG

[subhash <subhash AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>]

Dear Li-Ke,

Nice abstract. I sign off with one minor suggestion:

"The apparent violation of NCQ scaling may indicate the dominance of 
hadronic interactions over partonic interactions at 11.5 GeV" --> It 
should be valid for energy at and below 11.5 GeV, right? Please modify 
the sentence.

Thanks and regards,
Subhash


On 2022-04-22 02:36 PM, LikeLiu via Star-fcv-l wrote:
> Dear Prithwish,
>
> Thank you very much for your nice suggestions, I have revised the
> abstract as your suggested.
> Please have a look at this link:
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/presentations/SQM-2022/Elliptic-and-triangular-flow-multi-strange-hadrons-and-phi-mesons-BES-II-ener
>
> Best regards,
> Li-Ke
>
> > 2022年4月22日 上午2:17，Prithwish Tribedy via Star-fcv-l 
> > <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov> 写道：
> >
> > Dear Li-Ke and Prabhupada,
> >   Thanks for preparing the merged abstract. I think we may need to go 
> > for another iteration to sharpen the abstract a bit.
> >
> > The most important point is that the BES-I data indicated 
> > number-of-constituent-quark scaled elliptic flow for phi meson show 
> > about 2 sigma  deviations from the group of particles for which NCQ 
> > scaling holds at 11.5 GeV 
> > (https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://arxiv.org/pdf/1301.2347.pdf__;!!P4SdNyxKAPE!DhmyFz5u9yNg6DhW_mUJXl7Yt0pzx4wvMsQnN3_EbkxlfVSC2kNS6sWRV0qW-jEw_-1TftiP1QOFC1WPS_xlIbov7cEmBWuy$ 
> > ). The apparent violation of NCQ scaling may indicate the dominance of 
> > hadronic interactions over partonic interactions at 11.5 GeV. It is 
> > very important to revisit this with high statistics data in the range 
> > of 3-19.6 GeV. This is the strength of your measurement and should be 
> > highlighted instead of just saying a test of NCQ scaling will be 
> > performed.
> >
> > Here are a few more suggestions on wordings:
> >
> > "provides informations" -->  "provides information"
> >
> > "from the early stage"-->"from the early stages"
> >
> > "hint  to  be  smaller" -->"hint to be smaller than "
> >
> > "present precise measurements-->present measurements with improved 
> > precision"
> >
> > "at STAR" --> "from STAR"
> >
> > Best,
> > Prithwish
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 2022-04-21 08:27, webmaster--- via Star-fcv-l wrote:
> > > Dear star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
> > > Like Liu (likeliu AT mails.ccnu.edu.cn) has submitted a material for a 
> > > review,
> > > please have a look:
> > > https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/59298
> > > ---
> > > If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
> > > webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Star-fcv-l mailing list
> > > Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
> >
> >
> > On 2022-04-21 08:27, webmaster--- via Star-fcv-l wrote:
> > > Dear star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
> > > Like Liu (likeliu AT mails.ccnu.edu.cn) has submitted a material for a 
> > > review,
> > > please have a look:
> > > https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/59298
> > > ---
> > > If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
> > > webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Star-fcv-l mailing list
> > > Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
> > _______________________________________________
> > Star-fcv-l mailing list
> > Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Star-fcv-l mailing list
> Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l