STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG

[LikeLiu <likeliu AT mails.ccnu.edu.cn>]

Dear Subhash,

Thanks for your suggestion, right, I have revised this sentence.

https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/presentations/SQM-2022/Elliptic-and-triangular-flow-multi-strange-hadrons-and-phi-mesons-BES-II-ener

Best regards,

Li-Ke

2022年4月22日 下午2:48，subhash <subhash AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov> 写道：

Dear Li-Ke,

Nice abstract. I sign off with one minor suggestion:

"The apparent violation of NCQ scaling may indicate the dominance of hadronic interactions over partonic interactions at 11.5 GeV" --> It should be valid for energy at and below 11.5 GeV, right? Please modify the sentence.

Thanks and regards,
Subhash


On 2022-04-22 02:36 PM, LikeLiu via Star-fcv-l wrote:

Dear Prithwish,
Thank you very much for your nice suggestions, I have revised the
abstract as your suggested.
Please have a look at this link:
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/presentations/SQM-2022/Elliptic-and-triangular-flow-multi-strange-hadrons-and-phi-mesons-BES-II-ener
Best regards,
Li-Ke

2022年4月22日 上午2:17，Prithwish Tribedy via Star-fcv-l <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov> 写道：
Dear Li-Ke and Prabhupada,
 Thanks for preparing the merged abstract. I think we may need to go for another iteration to sharpen the abstract a bit.
The most important point is that the BES-I data indicated number-of-constituent-quark scaled elliptic flow for phi meson show about 2 sigma  deviations from the group of particles for which NCQ scaling holds at 11.5 GeV (https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://arxiv.org/pdf/1301.2347.pdf__;!!P4SdNyxKAPE!DhmyFz5u9yNg6DhW_mUJXl7Yt0pzx4wvMsQnN3_EbkxlfVSC2kNS6sWRV0qW-jEw_-1TftiP1QOFC1WPS_xlIbov7cEmBWuy$ ). The apparent violation of NCQ scaling may indicate the dominance of hadronic interactions over partonic interactions at 11.5 GeV. It is very important to revisit this with high statistics data in the range of 3-19.6 GeV. This is the strength of your measurement and should be highlighted instead of just saying a test of NCQ scaling will be performed.
Here are a few more suggestions on wordings:
"provides informations" -->  "provides information"
"from the early stage"-->"from the early stages"
"hint  to  be  smaller" -->"hint to be smaller than "
"present precise measurements-->present measurements with improved precision"
"at STAR" --> "from STAR"
Best,
Prithwish
On 2022-04-21 08:27, webmaster--- via Star-fcv-l wrote:

Dear star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
Like Liu (likeliu AT mails.ccnu.edu.cn) has submitted a material for a review,
please have a look:
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/59298
---
If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
_______________________________________________
Star-fcv-l mailing list
Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l

On 2022-04-21 08:27, webmaster--- via Star-fcv-l wrote:

Dear star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
Like Liu (likeliu AT mails.ccnu.edu.cn) has submitted a material for a review,
please have a look:
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/59298
---
If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
_______________________________________________
Star-fcv-l mailing list
Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l

_______________________________________________
Star-fcv-l mailing list
Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l

_______________________________________________
Star-fcv-l mailing list
Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l