star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG
List archive
Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Haojie Xu for Quark Matter 2022 submitted for review
- From: haojiexu <haojiexu AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>
- To: "Van Buren, Gene" <gene AT bnl.gov>, "STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG" <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
- Subject: Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Haojie Xu for Quark Matter 2022 submitted for review
- Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2022 13:20:02 +0800
Hi Gene, and all,
Thank you for the plot. I also made the same plot with more stat.
Thank you for the plot. I also made the same plot with more stat.
As I have shown in my previous plots that the multiplicity distribution ratios Ru(<vx> > mean)/Zr(<vx> < mean) (~65 um differences in vx) and Ru(<vx> < mean)/Zr(<vx> > mean) (~9 um differences in vx) are almost the same (see also the attached plot). The result shows no track effeicecy difference at this level.
with best regards,
Haojie
On 2022-04-27 11:54, Van Buren, Gene via Star-fcv-l wrote:
Hi, Jamie and all,
On this particular point....
On Apr 26, 2022, at 7:53 PM, James Dunlop via Star-fcv-l
<star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
The beam shifts by ~40 um all the time. It's beam steering at that
level,
often used to level our luminosity.
I offer the following not as a contradiction, but as complementary
information on the beam positions (and I'm certainly not making any
kind of statement on noticeable impacts from beam positions on track
reconstruction efficiency)...
The mean <Vx> at z=0 for each fill (which I labeled as "x0") is shown
in the below plot obtained from only a small fraction of the event
statistics. The colors show the two beam species. I would conclude
that whatever beam steering they were doing, they managed to get x0
consistent within a given species to within +/-15 microns
fill-to-fill. If it weren't for that consistency, we wouldn't see the
apparent offset between the two species.
But on the core topic of this thread of tracking efficiency
differences between the two species, I do not have the confidence to
say that SpaceCharge & GridLeak distortion corrections are consistent
between the two species at the level necessary to avoid systematic
track reconstruction efficiency differences at the 0.1% level. That
level of confidence would be difficult to achieve, in my opinion.
-Gene
_______________________________________________
Star-fcv-l mailing list
Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
Attachment:
PastedGraphic-1.png
Description: PNG image
-
Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Haojie Xu for Quark Matter 2022 submitted for review
, (continued)
- Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Haojie Xu for Quark Matter 2022 submitted for review, Jiangyong Jia, 04/26/2022
- Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Haojie Xu for Quark Matter 2022 submitted for review, James Dunlop, 04/26/2022
- Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Haojie Xu for Quark Matter 2022 submitted for review, Roy Lacey, 04/26/2022
- Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Haojie Xu for Quark Matter 2022 submitted for review, Huan Zhong Huang, 04/26/2022
- Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Haojie Xu for Quark Matter 2022 submitted for review, Huan Zhong Huang, 04/26/2022
- Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Haojie Xu for Quark Matter 2022 submitted for review, James Dunlop, 04/26/2022
- Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Haojie Xu for Quark Matter 2022 submitted for review, Huan Zhong Huang, 04/26/2022
- Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Haojie Xu for Quark Matter 2022 submitted for review, James Dunlop, 04/26/2022
- Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Haojie Xu for Quark Matter 2022 submitted for review, Huan Zhong Huang, 04/26/2022
- Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Haojie Xu for Quark Matter 2022 submitted for review, Van Buren, Gene, 04/26/2022
- Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Haojie Xu for Quark Matter 2022 submitted for review, haojiexu, 04/27/2022
- Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Haojie Xu for Quark Matter 2022 submitted for review, Huan Zhong Huang, 04/27/2022
- Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Haojie Xu for Quark Matter 2022 submitted for review, ShinIchi Esumi, 04/27/2022
- Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Haojie Xu for Quark Matter 2022 submitted for review, haojiexu, 04/27/2022
- Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Haojie Xu for Quark Matter 2022 submitted for review, haojiexu, 04/27/2022
- Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Haojie Xu for Quark Matter 2022 submitted for review, ShinIchi Esumi, 04/27/2022
- Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Haojie Xu for Quark Matter 2022 submitted for review, haojiexu, 04/27/2022
- Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Haojie Xu for Quark Matter 2022 submitted for review, Huan Zhong Huang, 04/27/2022
- Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Haojie Xu for Quark Matter 2022 submitted for review, haojiexu, 04/27/2022
- Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Haojie Xu for Quark Matter 2022 submitted for review, James Dunlop, 04/27/2022
- Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Haojie Xu for Quark Matter 2022 submitted for review, haojiexu, 04/26/2022
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.