Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

star-fcv-l - Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Zhiwan Xu for DNP 2022 submitted for review

star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: subhash <subhash AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>
  • To: Zhiwan Xu <zhiwanxu AT physics.ucla.edu>, "STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG" <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
  • Subject: Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Zhiwan Xu for DNP 2022 submitted for review
  • Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2022 09:03:11 +0800

Dear Zhiwan,

Nice abstract. I sign off with following suggestions:

"We present new STAR data of Au+Au collision from the Beam Energy Scan II, ..." --> We present new measurements from STAR in Au+Au collisions from the Beam Energy Scan II, where the magnetic field may last longer, and ...

"However, owing to the weaker magnetic field and the larger background in isobar collisions, these results cannot rule out a possible CME signal in Au+Au collisions" --> However, these results cannot rule out a possible CME signal in Au+Au collisions owing to the weaker magnetic field, and the larger background in isobar collisions.
BTW, when you say larger background, do you mean low energy Au+Au collisions?

" ... to investigate the sensitivity on the CME signal in ..." --> ... to investigate the sensitivity of the CME signal in ...

Thanks and regards,
Subhash

On 2022-06-28 04:47 AM, Zhiwan Xu via Star-fcv-l wrote:
Dear Conveners,
Thank you for the comments. I have modified the abstract according to
the suggestions, please have a look:
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/60079

Best,
Zhiwan

----- Original Message -----
From: "Prithwish Tribedy via Star-fcv-l" <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
To: "STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG" <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Sent: Monday, June 27, 2022 10:55:36 AM
Subject: Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Zhiwan Xu for DNP 2022
submitted for review

Dear Zhiwan,
Here are my comment on your abstract. With these included I sign-off.

"quark-gluon plasma drops" --> "quark-gluon plasma medium"

"which undergo the chiral magnetic effect (CME)" --> "which can lead to
the chiral magnetic effect (CME)"

"pre-defined CME signal to be much smaller than previously
expected" --> "pre-defined CME signatures to be absent"

"insufficient to rule out a possible CME signal in Au+Au collisions
through extrapolation"
-->
"cannot rule out a possible CME signal in Au+Au collisions"

"with various event-shape handles" -- this sentence is not clear?

Best,
Prithwish

On 2022-06-27 13:22, webmaster--- via Star-fcv-l wrote:
Dear star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,

Zhiwan Xu (zhiwanxu AT physics.ucla.edu) has submitted a material for a
review,
please have a look:
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/60079

---
If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
_______________________________________________
Star-fcv-l mailing list
Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
_______________________________________________
Star-fcv-l mailing list
Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
_______________________________________________
Star-fcv-l mailing list
Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page