Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

star-fcv-l - Re: [Star-fcv-l] Weird data in 27 GeV dataset

star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: James Dunlop <dunlop AT bnl.gov>
  • To: Eugenia Khyzhniak <eugenia.sh.el AT gmail.com>, "STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG" <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
  • Cc: Dmitry Arkhipkin <arkhipkin AT bnl.gov>, STAR Correlations and Fluctuations PWG <star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
  • Subject: Re: [Star-fcv-l] Weird data in 27 GeV dataset
  • Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2022 21:36:21 -0400

Oh, and the shiftlog say (bracketing those run numbers)
<quote>
01:03
General

MCR called to tell me that they had reset the CDev server, however our magnet
current alarm state is still red. The magnet is actually fine, so we will
keep running and just keep an eye on the magnet currents.
</quote>
and
<quote>
08:23
SlowControls

Magnet current readings in slow controls fixed after CDEV reset during the
night.
</quote>

So, easiest is to mark all runs from 19158001-19158020 bad. They are likely
not reconstructed correctly with the assumption of a gigantic magnetic field.
You may see quite an interesting momentum spectrum....

--J




> On Oct 21, 2022, at 9:24 PM, James Dunlop <dunlop AT bnl.gov> wrote:
>
> Hmm. That's interesting. There's something wrong with the magnetic
> field readout
> for that run. If I look at the runlog
> https://online.star.bnl.gov/RunLogRun18/index.php?r=19158007
> it says
>
> STAR Magnet 100,000,000.0 Amps
>
> which would be pretty impressive if it were real :)
>
> this seems to last between runs 19158001-19158020
> where 19158001-3 are at -100 MAmps
> and 19158006-20 are at +100 MAmps
>
>
>
>> On Oct 21, 2022, at 6:54 PM, Eugenia Khyzhniak via Star-fcv-l
>> <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I'm working with a 27GeV_production_2018 dataset. I found that this
>> dataset contains Full and Reverse Full Field data. However, according to
>> the RunLog page, we should not have data for the Full Field in this
>> dataset at all. Also the RunLog page states that these files must belong
>> to the Reverse Full Field.
>> Here is few examples:
>> /home/starlib/home/starreco/reco/27GeV_production_2018/FullField/P19ib/2018/15/19158007/st_physics_19158007_raw_2000001.picoDst.root
>> /home/starlib/home/starreco/reco/27GeV_production_2018/FullField/P19ib/2018/158/19158007/st_physics_19158007_raw_2500001.picoDst.root
>> /home/starlib/home/starreco/reco/27GeV_production_2018/FullField/P19ib/2018/158/19158007/st_physics_19158007_raw_3000001.picoDst.root
>>
>> I'm confused. Does anyone know what is happening here?
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Yevheniia (Eugenia) Khyzhniak
>> _______________________________________________
>> Star-fcv-l mailing list
>> Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
>> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
>
> --
> He/Him/His
> Please do not feel obligated to respond to this message outside of your
> work hours.
> James C Dunlop Ph.: (631) 344-7781
> Building 510A Cell: (631)316-8153
> P.O. Box 5000 Fax: (631) 344-4206
> Brookhaven National Laboratory
> Upton, NY 11973
> dunlop AT bnl.gov
>

--
He/Him/His
Please do not feel obligated to respond to this message outside of your work
hours.
James C Dunlop Ph.: (631) 344-7781
Building 510A Cell: (631)316-8153
P.O. Box 5000 Fax: (631) 344-4206
Brookhaven National Laboratory
Upton, NY 11973
dunlop AT bnl.gov





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page