STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG

[Cameron Racz <cracz001 AT ucr.edu>]

Hi Prithwish,

Thank you, I agree those are also good changes. I’ve incorporated those as well and uploaded the new slides as version 4.

Cameron Racz

Ph.D. Candidate 

Heavy-ion Physics Group

University of California, Riverside

On Oct 24, 2022, at 11:16 AM, Prithwish Tribedy <ptribedy AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov> wrote:

Dear Cameron,
 Thanks for incorporating my comments. It would be great if you can add a line or two about the various sources of systematics you've studied. The ones that went into the figures shown on slide#8-10. You can add it on slide#8 right side or wherever you prefer. Something like: "Systematic uncertainties include...."

Also, I think on the conclusion slide, it's better to spell out "nuclear mass number scaling".
"Comparison of proton, deuteron, and triton v_3{\Psi_1}/A was shown" --> "The nuclear mass number scaling (v_3{\Psi_1}/A) for proton, deuteron, and tritons was studied"

The last time I missed your backup slide -- it looks good.

Best,
Prithwish


On 2022-10-24 10:30, Cameron Racz wrote:

Hi Prithwish,
Thank you for the comments and corrections, I’ve made those changes
and uploaded the new slides as version 3.
Cameron Racz
Ph.D. Candidate
Heavy-ion Physics Group
University of California, Riverside

On Oct 23, 2022, at 2:30 PM, Prithwish Tribedy via Star-fcv-l
<star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
Dear Cameron,
Very nice slides. I have a few comments. With these included I sign
off your talk.
slide#2: "at high energies; ~200 GeV" (this is not exactly true, we
have BES analyses, arXiv:1601.01999).
How about something like:
"at high energies; ~200 GeV" --> "using collider mode data
(√s_{NN}= 7.7-200 GeV) with a focus on the rapidity-even v_3
studies" ?
"no correlation" --> "no direct correlation" (This is better as
\Psi1, \Psi2 & \Psi3 correlations have been studied before and
nonzero correlations have been observed, arXiv:1701.06497)
"; must use \Psi_3" --> "& only to \Psi_3"
"HEDES shows" --> "Recent HEDES results show"
Somewhere on this slide it would be good to say "STAR fixed target
mode provides unique opportunity to go to energies down to
√s_{NN}=3 GeV"
slide#3: Title "Experimental Setup" --> "STAR fixed target
experimental setup" (It's better to explicitly mention "Fixed target
mode" somewhere in the beginning of your talk)
slide#8: "clear signal for protons" --> "significant non-zero v_3
for protons"
"made on " --> "made about"
slide#9: "opposite sign to v_1 at 3 GeV" --> Needs a reference
slide#10: Define what is "A".
"A-scaling" --> "Nuclear mass number scaling (A)"
"v_3{\Psi_1} is also present" --> "Non-zero significant v_3{\Psi_1}
observed"
"Tritons are currently under investigation for anything influencing
the results." --> "Triton results are currently under investigation
for the following effects:"
slide#10: "Tritons may have" --> "Tritons show"
Best,
Prithwish
On 2022-10-13 15:51, webmaster--- via Star-fcv-l wrote:

Dear star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
Cameron Racz (cracz001 AT ucr.edu) has submitted a material for a
review, please
have a look:
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/61320
Deadline: 2022-10-27
---
If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
_______________________________________________
Star-fcv-l mailing list
Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l

_______________________________________________
Star-fcv-l mailing list
Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l