STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG

[Prithwish Tribedy <ptribedy AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>]

Dear Cameron,
  Thanks for incorporating my comments. It would be great if you can add 
a line or two about the various sources of systematics you've studied. 
The ones that went into the figures shown on slide#8-10. You can add it 
on slide#8 right side or wherever you prefer. Something like: 
"Systematic uncertainties include...."

Also, I think on the conclusion slide, it's better to spell out "nuclear 
mass number scaling".
"Comparison of proton, deuteron, and triton v_3{\Psi_1}/A was shown" --> 
"The nuclear mass number scaling (v_3{\Psi_1}/A) for proton, deuteron, 
and tritons was studied"

The last time I missed your backup slide -- it looks good.

Best,
Prithwish


On 2022-10-24 10:30, Cameron Racz wrote:
> Hi Prithwish,
>
> Thank you for the comments and corrections, I’ve made those changes
> and uploaded the new slides as version 3.
>
> Cameron Racz
> Ph.D. Candidate
> Heavy-ion Physics Group
> University of California, Riverside
>
> > On Oct 23, 2022, at 2:30 PM, Prithwish Tribedy via Star-fcv-l
> > <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
> >
> > Dear Cameron,
> > Very nice slides. I have a few comments. With these included I sign
> > off your talk.
> >
> > slide#2: "at high energies; ~200 GeV" (this is not exactly true, we
> > have BES analyses, arXiv:1601.01999).
> >
> > How about something like:
> > "at high energies; ~200 GeV" --> "using collider mode data
> > (√s_{NN}= 7.7-200 GeV) with a focus on the rapidity-even v_3
> > studies" ?
> >
> > "no correlation" --> "no direct correlation" (This is better as
> > \Psi1, \Psi2 & \Psi3 correlations have been studied before and
> > nonzero correlations have been observed, arXiv:1701.06497)
> >
> > "; must use \Psi_3" --> "& only to \Psi_3"
> >
> > "HEDES shows" --> "Recent HEDES results show"
> >
> > Somewhere on this slide it would be good to say "STAR fixed target
> > mode provides unique opportunity to go to energies down to
> > √s_{NN}=3 GeV"
> >
> > slide#3: Title "Experimental Setup" --> "STAR fixed target
> > experimental setup" (It's better to explicitly mention "Fixed target
> > mode" somewhere in the beginning of your talk)
> >
> > slide#8: "clear signal for protons" --> "significant non-zero v_3
> > for protons"
> > "made on " --> "made about"
> >
> > slide#9: "opposite sign to v_1 at 3 GeV" --> Needs a reference
> >
> > slide#10: Define what is "A".
> > "A-scaling" --> "Nuclear mass number scaling (A)"
> >
> > "v_3{\Psi_1} is also present" --> "Non-zero significant v_3{\Psi_1}
> > observed"
> >
> > "Tritons are currently under investigation for anything influencing
> > the results." --> "Triton results are currently under investigation
> > for the following effects:"
> >
> > slide#10: "Tritons may have" --> "Tritons show"
> >
> > Best,
> > Prithwish
> >
> > On 2022-10-13 15:51, webmaster--- via Star-fcv-l wrote:
> >
> > > Dear star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
> > > Cameron Racz (cracz001 AT ucr.edu) has submitted a material for a
> > > review, please
> > > have a look:
> > > https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/61320
> > > Deadline: 2022-10-27
> > > ---
> > > If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
> > > webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Star-fcv-l mailing list
> > > Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
> > _______________________________________________
> > Star-fcv-l mailing list
> > Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l