Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

star-fcv-l - Re: [Star-fcv-l] Request inputs for O+O/d+A datasets and production priorities

star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Ma, Rongrong" <marr AT bnl.gov>
  • To: Maowu Nie <nie AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>, "STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG" <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
  • Subject: Re: [Star-fcv-l] Request inputs for O+O/d+A datasets and production priorities
  • Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2022 15:39:04 +0000

Dear All

Thanks for your inputs for this topic.

One additional question: does anyone need ETOF for their analyses aimed for
QM23? In other words, can the data production of d+Au/O+O proceed without
ETOF calibration? There is always the option of performing ETOF calibration
later on and applying them with a MuDst->PicoDst repass.

Thanks!

Best
Rongrong

> On Nov 17, 2022, at 9:47 PM, Maowu Nie via Star-fcv-l
> <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
>
> Dear Subhash,
>
> SDU group is also interested in h-jet Icp measurement in O+O for QM2023.
> Yang He(PhD student) is doing the measurement in isobar collisions, and we
> are targeting for HP2023.
> If we have the O+O data, the measurement can bridge the disappearance and
> appearance of jet quenching in HIC.
> Manpower: Yang He, Maowu Nie, Nihar Sahoo, Li Yi
> Hope it helps.
>
> Regards,
> Maowu
>
>
>> Dear All,
>> You may have seen email from Rongrong (see below) that we are
>> collecting inputs for data production priorities keeping QM'23 in
>> mind. Please let us know if you or your group are involved/interested
>> in analysis for O+O or d+Au systems targeting for QM? It will help us
>> setting up priority of production for these datasets.
>> Thanks and regards,
>> Subhash
>> for FCV conveners
>> ps:Here is Rongrong's email:
>> 4) Data production priority (PRIORITY LIST)
>> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/pwg/common/production-priorties
>> Run21: O+O vs. d+Au
>> Production time: 2 weeks each
>> Calibration time: d+Au - 4 weeks; O+O - a few months
>> Run22: st_physics, st_mtd, st_fwd, st_W, st_upc, st_zerobias
>> Conclusions:
>> - One suggestion: (Run20+21) 26.5 FXT (7.2) > 3.85 FXT I (3.0) > 44.5
>> FXT (9.2) > 70 FXT (11.5) > 100 FXT (13.7) > 200 GeV d+Au > 200 GeV
>> O+O >? 17.3 COL > 3.85 FXT II (3.0). Will continue the discussion
>> next week.
>> - PWGs are asked to poll the interests of analyzing O+O data for QM
>> - Suggested Run 22 priority: st_upc > st_zerobias > st_W > st_physics
>> > st_fwd > st_mtd
>> -- ColdQCD PWG will determine a list of runs for EMC calibration,
>> which could be produced before physics production
>> -- it should be very fast to produce st_upc and st_zerobias streams
>> -- need to discuss with S&C team whether it is efficient to produce
>> st_zerobias stream standalone and couple it with other data streams
> _______________________________________________
> Star-fcv-l mailing list
> Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page