Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

star-fcv-l - Re: [Star-fcv-l] Request inputs for O+O/d+A datasets and production priorities

star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Shengli Huang <shengli.huang AT stonybrook.edu>
  • To: "Ma, Rongrong" <marr AT bnl.gov>, "STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG" <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
  • Subject: Re: [Star-fcv-l] Request inputs for O+O/d+A datasets and production priorities
  • Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2022 12:50:08 -0500

Dear Rongrong,
    As I know, there is no plan to use ETOF for QM23. 
     In future, it will be very useful for forward PID vn analysis in small systems after we include it.

Thanks!
Shengli

On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 10:40 AM Ma, Rongrong via Star-fcv-l <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
Dear All

Thanks for your inputs for this topic.

One additional question: does anyone need ETOF for their analyses aimed for QM23? In other words, can the data production of d+Au/O+O proceed without ETOF calibration? There is always the option of performing ETOF calibration later on and applying them with a MuDst->PicoDst repass.

Thanks!

Best
Rongrong

> On Nov 17, 2022, at 9:47 PM, Maowu Nie via Star-fcv-l <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
>
> Dear Subhash,
>
> SDU group is also interested in h-jet Icp measurement in O+O for QM2023.
> Yang He(PhD student) is doing the measurement in isobar collisions, and we are targeting for HP2023.
> If we have the O+O data, the measurement can bridge the disappearance and appearance of jet quenching in HIC.
> Manpower: Yang He, Maowu Nie, Nihar Sahoo, Li Yi
> Hope it helps.
>
> Regards,
> Maowu
>
>
>> Dear All,
>> You may have seen email from Rongrong (see below) that we are
>> collecting inputs for data production priorities keeping QM'23 in
>> mind. Please let us know if you or your group are involved/interested
>> in analysis for O+O or d+Au systems targeting for QM? It will help us
>> setting up priority of production for these datasets.
>> Thanks and regards,
>> Subhash
>> for FCV conveners
>> ps:Here is Rongrong's email:
>> 4) Data production priority (PRIORITY LIST)
>> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/pwg/common/production-priorties
>> Run21: O+O vs. d+Au
>> Production time: 2 weeks each
>> Calibration time: d+Au - 4 weeks; O+O - a few months
>> Run22: st_physics, st_mtd, st_fwd, st_W, st_upc, st_zerobias
>> Conclusions:
>> - One suggestion: (Run20+21) 26.5 FXT (7.2) > 3.85 FXT I (3.0) > 44.5
>> FXT (9.2) > 70 FXT (11.5) > 100 FXT (13.7) > 200 GeV d+Au  > 200 GeV
>> O+O >? 17.3 COL  > 3.85 FXT II (3.0). Will continue the discussion
>> next week.
>> - PWGs are asked to poll the interests of analyzing O+O data for QM
>> - Suggested Run 22 priority: st_upc > st_zerobias > st_W > st_physics
>> > st_fwd > st_mtd
>> -- ColdQCD PWG will determine a list of runs for EMC calibration,
>> which could be produced before physics production
>> -- it should be very fast to produce st_upc and st_zerobias streams
>> -- need to discuss with S&C team whether it is efficient to produce
>> st_zerobias stream standalone and couple it with other data streams
> _______________________________________________
> Star-fcv-l mailing list
> Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l

_______________________________________________
Star-fcv-l mailing list
Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page