STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG

["Wang, Fuqiang" <fqwang AT purdue.edu>]

An immediate comment I have is that, in order to arrive at an interpretation, 
all data have to be considered including the Lambda data which is one of our 
institutional comments. I'm not sure the Lambda data would naturally be 
consistent with the current interpretation. If it is, we should clearly 
convey that; if it isn't, we should add remark/caveat on that. 

So to me, the first thing to be resolved is to have the Lambda data in the 
paper. Then we can craft the messages of the papers.

Best regards,
Fuqiang



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Star-fcv-l <star-fcv-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov> On Behalf Of Ma, 
> Rongrong
> via Star-fcv-l
> Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2022 1:37 PM
> To: STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
> Subject: [Star-fcv-l] Homework questions for GPC #332 and #337
> 
> ---- External Email: Use caution with attachments, links, or sharing data 
> ----
> 
> 
> Dear PAs, members of GPC #332, #337
> 
> Thanks very much for preparing slides and participating in today's 
> discussion,
> which really helped to push both papers forward. Here are the questions as
> mentioned during the meeting. Please provide answers before Jan. 4th.
> 
> 1) Do you agree with the essence of the following big-picture message for 
> the
> two papers: the Hall effect dominates in 10-40% centrality while
> Faraday+Coulomb dominates in peripheral collisions?
> 
> A related question: can we defend this physics message as a collaboration? 
> Are
> we aware of any models/calculations that state such a centrality dependence 
> is
> not possible?
> 
> 2) Are you open to combine both analyses into one paper? If not, are you 
> open
> to submit both papers to the same journal? If so, which journal(s) do you
> recommend?
> 
> 3) If you prefer to have two papers, please send out your proposed abstract,
> conclusion, and relevant discussions of the other analysis for your own 
> paper,
> taking into account today's discussion and question 1),
> 
> Let's see responses from both GPCs, and hopefully we can converge soon.
> Thanks!
> 
> Best
> Rongrong
> _______________________________________________
> Star-fcv-l mailing list
> Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l