STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG

["Ma, Rongrong" <marr AT bnl.gov>]

Hello GPC #332, #337

First of all, Happy New Year 2023!

So far, we have not received any written replies to the homework questions. I 
propose to have another joint discussion this Wednesday during the FCV weekly 
meeting to touch base, and see what the next steps would be. It will be nice 
if PAs can prepare answers, or at least the main thoughts, to the questions. 

Talk to you on Wednesday. Thanks. 

Best
Rongrong

> On Dec 21, 2022, at 1:37 PM, Ma, Rongrong via Star-fcv-l 
> <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
> 
> Dear PAs, members of GPC #332, #337
> 
> Thanks very much for preparing slides and participating in today's 
> discussion, which really helped to push both papers forward. Here are the 
> questions as mentioned during the meeting. Please provide answers before 
> Jan. 4th. 
> 
> 1) Do you agree with the essence of the following big-picture message for 
> the two papers: the Hall effect dominates in 10-40% centrality while 
> Faraday+Coulomb dominates in peripheral collisions? 
> 
> A related question: can we defend this physics message as a collaboration? 
> Are we aware of any models/calculations that state such a centrality 
> dependence is not possible?
> 
> 2) Are you open to combine both analyses into one paper? If not, are you 
> open to submit both papers to the same journal? If so, which journal(s) do 
> you recommend?
> 
> 3) If you prefer to have two papers, please send out your proposed 
> abstract, conclusion, and relevant discussions of the other analysis for 
> your own paper, taking into account today's discussion and question 1), 
> 
> Let's see responses from both GPCs, and hopefully we can converge soon. 
> Thanks!
> 
> Best
> Rongrong
> _______________________________________________
> Star-fcv-l mailing list
> Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l