STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG

[ASHIK IKBAL <ashikhep AT gmail.com>]

Hello all,

Here are our replies to Rongrong's homework questions: https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/replies_rongrongsq_gpc332.pdf

Happy new year 2023!

Thanks,

Ashik

On Wed, Jan 4, 2023 at 2:30 PM dshen via Star-fcv-l <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:

Dear all,

Happy New Year!
Here are the answers for discussion from our side.
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/JointDiscussionJan3.pdf

Best,
Diyu for the PAs


On 2023-01-03 02:14, Ma, Rongrong via Star-fcv-l wrote:
> Hello GPC #332, #337
>
> First of all, Happy New Year 2023!
>
> So far, we have not received any written replies to the homework
> questions. I propose to have another joint discussion this Wednesday
> during the FCV weekly meeting to touch base, and see what the next
> steps would be. It will be nice if PAs can prepare answers, or at
> least the main thoughts, to the questions.
>
> Talk to you on Wednesday. Thanks.
>
> Best
> Rongrong
>
>> On Dec 21, 2022, at 1:37 PM, Ma, Rongrong via Star-fcv-l
>> <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
>>
>> Dear PAs, members of GPC #332, #337
>>
>> Thanks very much for preparing slides and participating in today's
>> discussion, which really helped to push both papers forward. Here are
>> the questions as mentioned during the meeting. Please provide answers
>> before Jan. 4th.
>>
>> 1) Do you agree with the essence of the following big-picture message
>> for the two papers: the Hall effect dominates in 10-40% centrality
>> while Faraday+Coulomb dominates in peripheral collisions?
>>
>> A related question: can we defend this physics message as a
>> collaboration? Are we aware of any models/calculations that state such
>> a centrality dependence is not possible?
>>
>> 2) Are you open to combine both analyses into one paper? If not, are
>> you open to submit both papers to the same journal? If so, which
>> journal(s) do you recommend?
>>
>> 3) If you prefer to have two papers, please send out your proposed
>> abstract, conclusion, and relevant discussions of the other analysis
>> for your own paper, taking into account today's discussion and
>> question 1),
>>
>> Let's see responses from both GPCs, and hopefully we can converge
>> soon. Thanks!
>>
>> Best
>> Rongrong
>> _______________________________________________
>> Star-fcv-l mailing list
>> Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
>> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
>
> _______________________________________________
> Star-fcv-l mailing list
> Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
_______________________________________________
Star-fcv-l mailing list
Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l

--

Ashik Ikbal

Research Associate

Kent State University

Department Of Physics

Kent, OH 44242, USA

Contact no.s: +1 631-504-7647 (USA)

                      +91 8250216234 (India)

Alternate e-mails: asheikh2 AT kent.edu

                             ashik AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov

                             ashik.ikbal.sheikh AT cern.ch