STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG

[Prithwish Tribedy <ptribedy AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>]

Hi Adiya,
Firstly, I noticed that my previous comments did not save properly and 
the formatting was also messed up. Therefore, I have added my comments 
to your abstract again for your consideration.
Best,
Prithwish


Nice abstract! Please consider the following suggestions to prepare a 
modified version of your talk:

"The Faraday+Coulomb effects in heavy-ion collisions have been recently 
observed at STAR." -->
"STAR has recently reported observations consistent with the presence of 
Faraday+Coulomb effects in heavy-ion collisions.",,,

"which manifest a negative ∆v1, i.e., the difference" -->
"Such effects are predicted to results in a negative ∆v1, defined by the 
difference",,,

"within a rapidity window of (−1, 1), as a function of rapidity"-->
"as a function of rapidity in the window of $-1<y<1$ ",,,

"Furthermore, the measurements at √sNN = 7.7 GeV provide enlightening 
insights into the role of electromagnetic fields in the system 
evolution, when hadronic interactions dominate over the partonic ones." 
-->
"Additionally, by extending our measurements to as low as √sNN = 7.7 
GeV, we have the exciting opportunity to gain insights into the role of 
electromagnetic fields in the evolution of the system, particularly when 
hadronic interactions begin to dominate over partonic interactions.",,,

Additional points:
    The observation of smaller negative values of kaon splitting 
compared to proton was consistent with the Hall effect even in 
peripheral events. However, the abstract only mentions Faraday+Coulomb 
effects. It would be better to start the abstract with the combined 
effect of Faraday+Coulomb and Hall effects, such as "STAR has recently 
reported observations consistent with the presence of Faraday+Coulomb 
and Hall effects in heavy-ion collisions.",,,

    Regarding the statement "as well as a stronger effect with 
increasing pT," we look forward to seeing the promised pt dependence 
along with data for other energies in the future. We are particularly 
interested in seeing the <pT> vs centrality of various PID as discussed 
at the collaboration meeting.,,,

   We also look forward to the presentation of data for other energies 
(14.6 and 7.7) at future PWG meetings.,,,

    Additionally, we believe it would be helpful to take a look at the 
Lambda results (not part of your abstract) to enhance our understanding 
of the phenomenon, as it has been a recurring theme. We hope these 
suggestions will be addressed in future studies.



On 2023-04-18 10:40, webmaster--- via Star-fcv-l wrote:
> Dear star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
>
> Aditya Prasad Dash (adityaprasaddash55 AT gmail.com) has submitted a 
> material
> for a review, please have a look:
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/63454
>
> Deadline: 2023-05-01
> ---
> If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
> webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
> _______________________________________________
> Star-fcv-l mailing list
> Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l