STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG

[rishabh <rishabh AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>]

Dear Subhash,

Thank you for your comments. Please find the revised version of slides 
here: https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/64854.

> s#4: This is for my understanding, how light nuclei v3 of has better 
> sensitivity to initial fluctuation, if they are formed at later stage?

Nucleons will propagate the initial state fluctuations if the light 
nuclei are formed by the coalescence mechanism.

> s#9: Could you indicate the fraction of reduction in error in BES-II 
> relative to BES-I?

The improvement in statistical uncertainty varies from particle to 
particle and with the pT bin. On average, we observe a 30–40% 
improvement in BES-II energies compared to BES-I energies.
Instead of writing it down on the slide, I was hoping, just like in my 
SQM talk, that I could tell the fraction while delivering the talk. 
Please let me know if that is okay.

> s#14: At the lowest pT, I see v3 of p and d are consistent. It might be 
> better if you specify the pt-range for which mass dependence is 
> observed.

Implemented.

> s#15: You can indicate fit to proton data beside the function in the 
> legend. The Y-axis scale of the bottom panels is very large, can you 
> try reducing them, so the level of scaling would be clearly visible.

Implemented.


Please let me know if you have any further suggestions for me.

Thanks and regards,
Rishabh

On 2023-08-28 13:14, subhash via Star-fcv-l wrote:
> Dear Rishabh,
>
> Nice slides. I have a few suggestions for your consideration:
>
> s#4: This is for my understanding, how light nuclei v3 of has better
> sensitivity to initial fluctuation, if they are formed at later stage?
>
> s#9: Could you indicate the fraction of reduction in error in BES-II
> relative to BES-I?
>
> s#14: At the lowest pT, I see v3 of p and d are consistent. It might
> be better if you specify the pt-range for which mass dependence is
> observed.
>
> s#15: You can indicate fit to proton data beside the function in the 
> legend.
> The Y-axis scale of the bottom panels is very large, can you try
> reducing them, so the level of scaling would be clearly visible.
>
>
> Thanks and regsrds,
> Subhash
>
>
> On 2023-08-24 10:01 PM, webmaster--- via Star-fcv-l wrote:
> > Dear star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
> >
> > Rishabh Sharma (rishabhsharma AT students.iisertirupati.ac.in) has 
> > submitted a
> > material for a review, please have a look:
> > https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/64854
> >
> > Deadline: 2023-09-03
> > ---
> > If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
> > webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
> > _______________________________________________
> > Star-fcv-l mailing list
> > Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
> _______________________________________________
> Star-fcv-l mailing list
> Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l