star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG
List archive
Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Rishabh Sharma for Quark Matter 2023 submitted for review
- From: rishabh <rishabh AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>
- To: "STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG" <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
- Cc: "Md. Nasim" <mnasim2008 AT gmail.com>, webmaster AT star.bnl.gov
- Subject: Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Rishabh Sharma for Quark Matter 2023 submitted for review
- Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2023 17:39:09 +0530
Dear Nasim,
Thank you for your suggestion. Please find the link to AMPT study of v2 of protons here: https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/ampt_v2_protons.pdf.
Please let me know if you have any further suggestions for me.
Thanks and regards,
Rishabh
On 2023-08-29 15:32, Md. Nasim via Star-fcv-l wrote:
Hi Rishabh,
I have one suggestion for slide 12.
It is nice to see that AMPT+Coal explain the v2 of deuterons. It would
be good to check if AMPT can explain the v2 of protons or not.
If AMPT fails to explain the v2 of protons but AMPT+Coal explains v2
of deuterons, then we need to be careful while making a conclusion
from it.
On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 2:38 AM Sooraj Radhakrishnan via Star-fcv-l
<star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
Hi Rishabh,
Thanks for preparing the nice presentation and the interesting
results. Please find a few comments from me below
It is somewhat surprising that v3 shows good mass scaling, while v2
doesn't. Is there an explanation for this?
From BES-I results, we had claimed that mass number scaling holds
for v2 within pT/A < 1.5 GeV (PRC 94, 034908 (2016)). With BES-II we
see deviations. Do you have a comparison of the BES-I and BES-II
results for the different particle species?
S4: What is the equation about?
S4: Why is the fluctuating initial conditions relevant here?
S5: Please include EPD and ETOF also under BES-II upgrades
S5: track momentum and event plane?
S6: What is track resolution?
S9: What is the low pT you refer to here? Please indicate the range
S12: seems to be --> is in
S15: Can you quantify the extend of scaling? May be fit a constant
to your lower plots and evaluate the value and uncertainty. This
should tell you to within what percentage you can claim v3 scaling
S16: seems to be --> is in
S17: You could also point to other light nuclei flow results from
STAR (Chengdong's talks for eg). In th outlook, you can indicate the
remaining energies to be measured and their relevance
Best,
Sooraj
On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 7:09 AM rishabh via Star-fcv-l
<star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
Dear Subhash,
Thank you for your comments. Please find the revised version of
slides
here: https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/64854.
s#4: This is for my understanding, how light nuclei v3 of hasbetter
sensitivity to initial fluctuation, if they are formed at laterstage?
Nucleons will propagate the initial state fluctuations if the
light
nuclei are formed by the coalescence mechanism.
s#9: Could you indicate the fraction of reduction in error inBES-II
relative to BES-I?
The improvement in statistical uncertainty varies from particle to
particle and with the pT bin. On average, we observe a 30–40%
improvement in BES-II energies compared to BES-I energies.
Instead of writing it down on the slide, I was hoping, just like
in my
SQM talk, that I could tell the fraction while delivering the
talk.
Please let me know if that is okay.
s#14: At the lowest pT, I see v3 of p and d are consistent. Itmight be
better if you specify the pt-range for which mass dependence is
observed.
Implemented.
s#15: You can indicate fit to proton data beside the function inthe
legend. The Y-axis scale of the bottom panels is very large, canyou
try reducing them, so the level of scaling would be clearlyvisible.
Implemented.
Please let me know if you have any further suggestions for me.
Thanks and regards,
Rishabh
On 2023-08-28 13:14, subhash via Star-fcv-l wrote:
Dear Rishabh,better
Nice slides. I have a few suggestions for your consideration:
s#4: This is for my understanding, how light nuclei v3 of has
sensitivity to initial fluctuation, if they are formed at laterstage?
BES-II
s#9: Could you indicate the fraction of reduction in error in
relative to BES-I?might
s#14: At the lowest pT, I see v3 of p and d are consistent. It
be better if you specify the pt-range for which mass dependenceis
observed.the
s#15: You can indicate fit to proton data beside the function in
legend.
The Y-axis scale of the bottom panels is very large, can you try
reducing them, so the level of scaling would be clearly visible.
Thanks and regsrds,
Subhash
On 2023-08-24 10:01 PM, webmaster--- via Star-fcv-l wrote:
Dear star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
Rishabh Sharma (rishabhsharma AT students.iisertirupati.ac.in) has
contactsubmitted a
material for a review, please have a look:
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/64854
Deadline: 2023-09-03
---
If you have any problems with the review process, please
_______________________________________________webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
Star-fcv-l mailing list
Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
Star-fcv-l mailing list
Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
Star-fcv-l mailing list
Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
--
Sooraj Radhakrishnan
Research Scientist,
Department of Physics
Kent State University
Kent, OH 44243
Physicist Postdoctoral AffiliateNuclear Science Division
Lawrence Berkeley National Lab
MS70R0319, One Cyclotron Road
Berkeley, CA 94720
Ph: 510-495-2473 [1]
Email: skradhakrishnan AT lbl.gov
_______________________________________________
Star-fcv-l mailing list
Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
--
Thanks,
With Best Regards,
Nasim
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Md Nasim
Assistant Professor
Department of Physics
Indian Institute of Science Education and Research (IISER) Berhampur,
Engineering School Road,
Berhampur, Odisha 760010India
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Links:
------
[1] tel:%28510%29%20495-2473
_______________________________________________
Star-fcv-l mailing list
Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
-
[Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Rishabh Sharma for Quark Matter 2023 submitted for review,
webmaster, 08/24/2023
-
Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Rishabh Sharma for Quark Matter 2023 submitted for review,
subhash, 08/28/2023
-
Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Rishabh Sharma for Quark Matter 2023 submitted for review,
rishabh, 08/28/2023
-
Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Rishabh Sharma for Quark Matter 2023 submitted for review,
Sooraj Radhakrishnan, 08/28/2023
-
Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Rishabh Sharma for Quark Matter 2023 submitted for review,
Md. Nasim, 08/29/2023
- Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Rishabh Sharma for Quark Matter 2023 submitted for review, rishabh, 08/30/2023
-
Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Rishabh Sharma for Quark Matter 2023 submitted for review,
rishabh, 08/29/2023
- Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Rishabh Sharma for Quark Matter 2023 submitted for review, Sooraj Radhakrishnan, 08/30/2023
-
Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Rishabh Sharma for Quark Matter 2023 submitted for review,
Md. Nasim, 08/29/2023
-
Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Rishabh Sharma for Quark Matter 2023 submitted for review,
Sooraj Radhakrishnan, 08/28/2023
-
Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Rishabh Sharma for Quark Matter 2023 submitted for review,
rishabh, 08/28/2023
-
Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Rishabh Sharma for Quark Matter 2023 submitted for review,
subhash, 08/28/2023
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.