STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG

[LikeLiu <likeliu AT mails.ccnu.edu.cn>]

Hi Grazyna Odyniec,

Thanks for your suggestion, I have updated the phase diagram slide as you suggested.

As for the gray background, it’s because of the browser issue. When opened with a PDF viewer, it should display properly.

https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/QM2023_poster_Like_v4.pdf

thanks,

Li-Ke 

2023年8月29日 上午10:01，Grazyna Odyniec <g_odyniec AT lbl.gov> 写道：

Hi Li-Ke,

Very nice. Thank you for incorporating my suggestions. I do not have more concerns.

Except  the proposal regarding phase diagram picture, see below (in-line).

Best regards,

Grazyna


On 8/28/23 1:24 AM, LikeLiu wrote:

Dear Grazyna Odyniec,

Thank you very much for your review and suggestions, I have revised the draft according to these suggestions.
Also find my some reply below:

The plot is taken from Particles 3(2) article *where it serves slightly different purpose), and you added green arrows and blue boxes (above the cartoon). The problem is that these green arrows point to particular points on the phase diagram, instead of pointing to the regions of mu_B. It is misleading. I suggest one of two solutions:

Or you simply enlarge the very small print which is in the very top of the figure on the left, which depicts the regions in mu_B (you can repeat it just above the cartoon with the bigger font), or you replace this figure with the another phase diagram cartoon, where the all energies are explicitly marked (one of the figures which is broadly used by us, where explicitly all energies are marked on the band across the diagram)

A: I prefer to use this figure, as the another phase diagram cartoon is a little busy to read, and I have removed these green arrows to avoid misleading.

Please find the update version via below link, and let me know if you have any suggestion!
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/QM2023_poster_Like_v3.pdf

Very good. So, in this case I suggest that your arrows (green in the previous version) will point to the regions marked by horizontal lines red color for RHIC collider and RHIC fixed target) at the very top of this phase diagram. The green arrow for the LHC can go directly down, as before.

I also suggest that you go back to the yellow background at the upper part of the figure, with the gray one on this new version is difficult to read writing.

Thanks,
Li-Ke

2023年8月27日 上午2:32，Grazyna Odyniec via Star-fcv-l <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov> 写道：

Hi Li-ke,

STAR management asked me to review your poster. Here are my comments and suggestions for your consideration.

It is a nice poster with well-planned positions of the figures and interesting results, my comments are related (mainly) to the clarity of the text on your slides:

Title: … from STAR -> … from the STAR experiment at RHIC

Motivation slide:


The plot is taken from Particles 3(2) article *where it serves slightly different purpose), and you added green arrows and blue boxes (above the cartoon). The problem is that these green arrows point to particular points on the phase diagram, instead of pointing to the regions of mu_B. It is misleading. I suggest one of two solutions:

Or you simply enlarge the very small print which is in the very top of the figure on the left, which depicts the regions in mu_B (you can repeat it just above the cartoon with the bigger font), or you replace this figure with the another phase diagram cartoon, where the all energies are explicitly marked (one of the figures which is broadly used by us, where explicitly all energies are marked on the band across the diagram)

Anisotropic flow slide:


You MUST say that the initial spatial anisotropy is converted to the anisotropic flow in the MOMENTUM space. It is very important.


I also think that you should move the sentence about self-quenching after you define what it is.

So, change the order, please, in the following way:

After line … initial space … -> anisotropic flow in momentum space.

Put line “Very sensitive … etc , + all formulas

And after defining v1 and v2 (formulas) you add your sentence about self – quenching

Experimental setup slide:


There is quite a few unnecessary repetitions between the yellow + black frames on the STAR picture and the text under it.

I suggest: removing these (yellow and black) windows (all is said in bullets)

You may add an info which detector were used in your analysis (it is always helpful)


Lower bullets, the second and third point can be combined (if you need more space):

Larger acceptance:

Eta: 1 -> 1.5, pt: 125 MeV/c -> 60 MeV/c

Analysis method slide:


The first bullet starting from “The n^th harmonic ...” should go to the top of this slide, under “Event plane method” and above formulas


I am not sure what you mean by the second bullet “since finite ...” – please reformulate


Decay particle reconstruction -> Particle Reconstruction


“K0 … reconstructed by KF package “– this does not explain anything to people who are not working on this topic, you need to say how you reconstruct particles, and you may say that you use KF package if you feel that this is needed

Results slide:


Larger than what?

Centrality dependence of v1 slope for net-particle, larger in magnitude for more peripheral collisions -> Centrality dependence of v1 slope for net-particle (net-p, net-K and net-pion), larger in magnitude than for particles (p, K, pions) for more peripheral collisions.

Summary & Outlook slide:


First bullet:

dv1/dy for net-particle, and v2 (pT) for identified particles -> dv1/dy for net-particle (net-p, net-K, net-pion), and v2 (pT) for identified particles ( …name them …)

Second bullet:

would offers more constrains on the models ... -> dv1/dynet-p, net-K and net-poin provides additional constraints to the models


Hope that it will help to shape this nice poster. If something was not clear, you can contac me and we will discuss it.

Good luck,

Grazyna Odyniec / LBNL

On 8/25/23 12:46 AM, webmaster--- via Star-fcv-l wrote:

Dear star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,

Li-ke Liu (likeliu AT mails.ccnu.edu.cn) has submitted a material for a review,
please have a look:
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/64871

Deadline: 2023-09-03
---
If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
_______________________________________________
Star-fcv-l mailing list
Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l

_______________________________________________
Star-fcv-l mailing list
Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l