STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG

[Grazyna Odyniec <g_odyniec AT lbl.gov>]

Thank you , Vipul, for incorporating my suggestions. I have no further 
comments.

Best regards,

Grazyna


On 8/28/23 7:32 PM, vipul wrote:
> Dear Grazyna,
>
> Thank you very much for your further comments and suggestions.
> I have included them and updated the file on Drupal in the following 
> link:
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/Poster_QM2023_v1_0.pdf
>
> All the references (for the STAR and model papers) are listed in the 
> Section 6 References.
> I have added references to the text as possible.
>
> Thanks,
> With Regards,
> Vipul
>
>
> On 2023-08-29 07:07, Grazyna Odyniec wrote:
> > Hi Vipul,
> >
> > Thank you for incorporating changes. I have a few follow-up comments
> > (below, in-line).
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Grazyna
> >
> >
> > On 8/27/23 7:19 PM, vipul wrote:
> > > Dear Grazyna Odyniec,
> > >
> > > Thank you for your comments and suggestions. I have implemented them 
> > > in the updated version uploaded to the Drupal in the following link:
> > > https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/Poster_QM2023_v1.pdf
> > >
> > > Please find my replies to your queries inline below.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > With Regards,
> > > Vipul
> > >
> > > On 2023-08-27 05:34, Grazyna Odyniec via Star-fcv-l wrote:
> > > > Hi Vipul,
> > > >
> > > > I was asked by STAR management to review a few posters for QM, yours
> > > > is one of them.
> > > >
> > > > Below are my comments/suggestions for your nice poster. My comments 
> > > > are
> > > > mostly related to the clarity of the presentation.
> > > >
> > > > Title:
> > > >
> > > > … in isobar collisions at RHIC - STAR”
> > > >
> > > > You are presenting STAR results, so it should be stated clearly, I 
> > > > suggest:
> > > >
> > > > … in isobar collisions from STAR experiment at RHIC”
> > > >
> > > > or even better:
> > > >
> > > > … in isobar collisions Ru+Ru and Zr+Zr from STAR experiment at RHIC”
> > > ---> Done. added "..in isobar collisions Ru+Ru and Zr+Zr from STAR 
> > > experiment at RHIC"
> > > > Experiment:
> > > >
> > > > Is 3.8B a total number of events (Zr+Ru)? Is it the same number of
> > > > events in both datasets ?
> > > --> 3.6 B events are the total number of events (Zr+Ru) as it is 
> > > written on the poster.
> >
> > OK - maybe it is enough, however it still does not say that the both
> > samples have the same (almost) number of events.
> >
> > > > Motivation:
> > > >
> > > > I think you want say that
> > > >
> > > > Elliptic flow (v2) of … gives information on:
> > > >
> > > > -Initial state anisotropies
> > > >
> > > > -insight into the nuclear density and deformation ... etc
> > > >
> > > > -system size dependence of the system evolution
> > > >
> > > > Is this correct? If it is, please, modify that it says so (for example
> > > > like the above).
> > > >
> > > > That will allow you to avoid repeating “Elliptic flow gives ...” in 
> > > > every line.
> > > >
> > > > BTW: I would suggest changing “gives” to “provides”
> > > --> Done. modified as suggested "gives" to "provides"
> > > > The figures in this window (still Motivation) need a little bit of 
> > > > explanation:
> > >
> > > --> The motivation figures, both left and right, are from the 
> > > published papers (not from this work).
> > > I have added a sentence to explain "Charged hadrons v2 shows 
> > > difference between Ru and Zr collisions both in theoretical
> > > and experimental measurements indicating effect of nuclear structure."
> >
> > Thank you. This is nice, but since the sentence is under all 4 figures
> > I suggest you say .... charged hadrons v2 and v3 show ....
> >
> > since these figures are from STAR's publication(s) - they should have
> > reference(s) to the published paper(s), please add it
> >
> > > > Left side figures:
> > > >
> > > > Bottom: it is a ratio of what?
> > > --> The Ratio of v2 between Ru+Ru / Zr+Zr  (it is written on the top 
> > > middle of the bottom panel). I cannot change the figure. It is from 
> > > a published STAR paper.
> > please add the reference to this paper
> > > > Right side plots:
> > > >
> > > > Top: what is 1%, 2%, 5%?
> > > --> Top 1%, 2%, and 5% denote the top 1%, 2%, and 5% centrality 
> > > events based on Npart from the model work.
> > when you add the appropriate reference, people will be able to go
> > there to get details
> > > > Bottom: Usually, data would be shown by solid symbols, and models by
> > > > open ones. If you can, please, change it to follow this.
> > > >
> > > > [It is a little bit confusing at present, because one model and data
> > > > are shown in similar way (by open symbols), and another model in
> > > > different one (by solids].
> > > --> The figure is from the published paper. I cannot change the figure.
> > add reference, please
> > > > Methodology:
> > > >
> > > > Left:
> > > >
> > > > Can you add two vertical lines for Phi invariant mass plot, as you
> > > > haveit for K0, that it will show what range of invariant mass was
> > > > included ?
> > > --> It is not possible as the Phi-meson yield is taken from the BW 
> > > fit. The fit range can be seen from the figure itself.
> > >
> > > > It needs conclusions: what we see
> > > --> It is a part of the methodology to extract yield. There is no 
> > > conclusion here.
> > This is a comment to this one (above) and to the one bellow:
> >
> > What I meant was that the one word "resolution" alone does not say
> > what kind of resolution it is. I would suggest : "Event Plane
> > Resolution" above or bellow figure (lower right).
> >
> > If this is your figure, you can consider adding this inside the frame
> > of this figure (in the first line): 2nd harmonic event plane (Psi)
> > resolution.
> >
> > > > Right:
> > > >
> > > > Resolution of what? You need to write that this is a reaction plane 
> > > > resolution.
> > > --> It is mentioned on the 3rd bullet point Event plane angle 
> > > resolution and in the figure 2nd harmonic event plane.
> > But how people know that the figure to the right is actually related
> > to point 3 ?
> > > > You can also comment that it is very similar for Ru and Zr (and
> > > > different for both heavier systems)
> > > --> The resolution is very similar for Ru and Zr and gets better 
> > > with heavier systems. It can be seen by the figure. I try to avoid 
> > > writing it so as not to make it too crowded with text.
> > OK
> > > > Best regards,
> > > >
> > > > Grazyna Odyniec / LBNL
> > > >
> > > > On 8/13/23 9:52 PM, webmaster--- via Star-fcv-l wrote:
> > > > > Dear star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
> > > > >
> > > > > Vipul Bairathi (vipul.bairathi AT gmail.com) has submitted a material 
> > > > > for a
> > > > > review, please have a look:
> > > > > https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/64625
> > > > >
> > > > > Deadline: 2023-09-03
> > > > > ---
> > > > > If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
> > > > > webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Star-fcv-l mailing list
> > > > > Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > > > > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Star-fcv-l mailing list
> > > > Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > > > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l