STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG

[vipul <vipul AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>]

Dear Grazyna Odyniec,

Thank you for your comments and suggestions. I have implemented them in 
the updated version uploaded to the Drupal in the following link:
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/Poster_QM2023_v1.pdf

Please find my replies to your queries inline below.

Thanks,
With Regards,
Vipul

On 2023-08-27 05:34, Grazyna Odyniec via Star-fcv-l wrote:
> Hi Vipul,
>
> I was asked by STAR management to review a few posters for QM, yours
> is one of them.
>
> Below are my comments/suggestions for your nice poster. My comments are
> mostly related to the clarity of the presentation.
>
> Title:
>
> … in isobar collisions at RHIC - STAR”
>
> You are presenting STAR results, so it should be stated clearly, I 
> suggest:
>
> … in isobar collisions from STAR experiment at RHIC”
>
> or even better:
>
> … in isobar collisions Ru+Ru and Zr+Zr from STAR experiment at RHIC”
---> Done. added "..in isobar collisions Ru+Ru and Zr+Zr from STAR 
experiment at RHIC"
> Experiment:
>
> Is 3.8B a total number of events (Zr+Ru)? Is it the same number of
> events in both datasets ?
--> 3.6 B events are the total number of events (Zr+Ru) as it is written 
on the poster.
> Motivation:
>
> I think you want say that
>
> Elliptic flow (v2) of … gives information on:
>
> -Initial state anisotropies
>
> -insight into the nuclear density and deformation ... etc
>
> -system size dependence of the system evolution
>
> Is this correct? If it is, please, modify that it says so (for example
> like the above).
>
> That will allow you to avoid repeating “Elliptic flow gives ...” in 
> every line.
>
> BTW: I would suggest changing “gives” to “provides”
--> Done. modified as suggested "gives" to "provides"
> The figures in this window (still Motivation) need a little bit of 
> explanation:

--> The motivation figures, both left and right, are from the published 
papers (not from this work).
I have added a sentence to explain "Charged hadrons v2 shows difference 
between Ru and Zr collisions both in theoretical
and experimental measurements indicating effect of nuclear structure."
> Left side figures:
>
> Bottom: it is a ratio of what?
--> The Ratio of v2 between Ru+Ru / Zr+Zr  (it is written on the top 
middle of the bottom panel). I cannot change the figure. It is from a 
published STAR paper.
> Right side plots:
>
> Top: what is 1%, 2%, 5%?
--> Top 1%, 2%, and 5% denote the top 1%, 2%, and 5% centrality events 
based on Npart from the model work.

> Bottom: Usually, data would be shown by solid symbols, and models by
> open ones. If you can, please, change it to follow this.
>
> [It is a little bit confusing at present, because one model and data
> are shown in similar way (by open symbols), and another model in
> different one (by solids].
--> The figure is from the published paper. I cannot change the figure.

> Methodology:
>
> Left:
>
> Can you add two vertical lines for Phi invariant mass plot, as you
> haveit for K0, that it will show what range of invariant mass was
> included ?
--> It is not possible as the Phi-meson yield is taken from the BW fit. 
The fit range can be seen from the figure itself.

> It needs conclusions: what we see
--> It is a part of the methodology to extract yield. There is no 
conclusion here.
> Right:
>
> Resolution of what? You need to write that this is a reaction plane 
> resolution.
--> It is mentioned on the 3rd bullet point Event plane angle resolution 
and in the figure 2nd harmonic event plane.
> You can also comment that it is very similar for Ru and Zr (and
> different for both heavier systems)
--> The resolution is very similar for Ru and Zr and gets better with 
heavier systems. It can be seen by the figure. I try to avoid writing it 
so as not to make it too crowded with text.
> Best regards,
>
> Grazyna Odyniec / LBNL
>
> On 8/13/23 9:52 PM, webmaster--- via Star-fcv-l wrote:
> > Dear star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
> >
> > Vipul Bairathi (vipul.bairathi AT gmail.com) has submitted a material for 
> > a
> > review, please have a look:
> > https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/64625
> >
> > Deadline: 2023-09-03
> > ---
> > If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
> > webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
> > _______________________________________________
> > Star-fcv-l mailing list
> > Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
> _______________________________________________
> Star-fcv-l mailing list
> Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l