Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

star-fcv-l - Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Vipul Bairathi for Quark Matter 2023 submitted for review

star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Grazyna Odyniec <g_odyniec AT lbl.gov>
  • To: star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
  • Subject: Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Vipul Bairathi for Quark Matter 2023 submitted for review
  • Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2023 17:04:48 -0700

Hi Vipul,

I was asked by STAR management to review a few posters for QM, yours is one of them.

Below are my comments/suggestion for your nice poster. My comments are mostly related to the clarity of the presentation.

Title:

… in isobar collisions at RHIC - STAR”

You are presenting STAR results, so it should be stated clearly, I suggest:

… in isobar collisions from STAR experiment at RHIC”

or even better:

… in isobar collisions Ru+Ru and Zr+Zr from STAR experiment at RHIC”

Experiment:

Is 3.8B a total number of events (Zr+Ru)? Is it the same number of events in both datasets ?

Motivation:

I think you want say that

Elliptic flow (v2) of … gives information on:

-Initial state anisotropies

-insight into the nuclear density and deformation ... etc

-system size dependence of the system evolution

Is this correct? If it is, please, modify that it says so (for example like the above).

That will allow you to avoid repeating “Elliptic flow gives ...” in every line.

BTW: I would suggest changing “gives” to “provides”

The figures in this window (still Motivation) need a little bit of explanation:

Left side figures:

Bottom: it is a ratio of what?

Right side plots:

Top: what is 1%, 2%, 5%?

Bottom: Usually, data would be shown by solid symbols, and models by open ones. If you can, please, change it to follow this.

[It is a little bit confusing at present, because one model and data are shown in similar way (by open symbols), and another model in different one (by solids].

Methodology:

Left:

Can you add two vertical lines for Phi invariant mass plot, as you haveit for K0, that it will show what range of invariant mass was included ?

It needs conclusions: what we see

Right:

Resolution of what? You need to write that this is a reaction plane resolution.

You can also comment that it is very similar for Ru and Zr (and different for both heavier systems)

Best regards,

Grazyna Odyniec / LBNL

On 8/13/23 9:52 PM, webmaster--- via Star-fcv-l wrote:
Dear star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,

Vipul Bairathi (vipul.bairathi AT gmail.com) has submitted a material for a
review, please have a look:
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/64625

Deadline: 2023-09-03
---
If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
_______________________________________________
Star-fcv-l mailing list
Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page