Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

star-fcv-l - Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Chengdong Han for Quark Matter 2023 submitted for review

star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: 韩成栋 <chdhan AT impcas.ac.cn>
  • To: "STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG" <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
  • Subject: Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Chengdong Han for Quark Matter 2023 submitted for review
  • Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2023 22:41:47 +0800 (GMT+08:00)

Dear Subhash,

Thank you very much for your nice and kind comments, I have updated my
proceeding
with your suggestions in the link: https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/66064


Thank you for your attention.

Best regards,

Chengdong Han



&gt; -----Original Messages-----
&gt; From: "subhash via Star-fcv-l" <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
&gt; Sent Time: 2023-11-23 17:17:21 (Thursday)
&gt; To: "STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG" <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
&gt; Cc: subhash <subhash AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>
&gt; Subject: Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Chengdong Han for Quark
Matter 2023 submitted for review
&gt;
&gt;
&gt; ps: For the next iteration, please add latex line numbers.
&gt;
&gt;
&gt; On 2023-11-23 05:15 PM, subhash via Star-fcv-l wrote:
&gt; &gt; Dear Chendong,
&gt; &gt;
&gt; &gt; Nicely proceedings. I have a few suggestions below for your
&gt; &gt; consideration:
&gt; &gt;
&gt; &gt; Abstract:
&gt; &gt; --------------------
&gt; &gt; "These results imply that the coalescence procedure dominants the
&gt; &gt; formation mechanism"
&gt; &gt; --&gt; These results suggest that the coalescence mechanism plays a
&gt; &gt; dominant role in the formation of light- and hyper-nuclei.
&gt; &gt;
&gt; &gt;
&gt; &gt; 1 Introduction
&gt; &gt; --------------------
&gt; &gt; "The RHIC two-phase Au + Au collisions beam energy scanning
experiment
&gt; &gt; BES-I and BESII is to produce nuclear matter with different
&gt; &gt; temperatures and baryon chemical potentials by changing the
collision
&gt; &gt; energy, to find the first-order phase transition and QCD critical
&gt; &gt; point in high baryon density region."
&gt; &gt; --&gt; The two phases of the Beam Energy Scan program at RHIC,
BES-I and
&gt; &gt; BES-II, aim to investigate nuclear matter at different temperatures
&gt; &gt; and baryon chemical potentials by colliding gold nuclei at various
&gt; &gt; collision energies. The goal is to identify the first-order phase
&gt; &gt; transition and the QCD critical point within the high baryon density
&gt; &gt; region.
&gt; &gt;
&gt; &gt;
&gt; &gt; "so it is possible to study the collective flow of light- and
&gt; &gt; hyper-nuclei." --&gt; you can probably make a new sentence: This
allows
&gt; &gt; for the study of the collective flow of light- and hyper-nuclei.
&gt; &gt;
&gt; &gt; "Where the light-nuclei carry information about local baryon density
&gt; &gt; fluctuations at freeze-out, which offers insights on the final state
&gt; &gt; nucleon-nucleon (N−N) interaction. And hyper-nuclei provide access
to
&gt; &gt; the hyperon-nucleon (Y −N) interaction."
&gt; &gt; --&gt; A better rephrase: Light-nuclei, in particular, carry
information
&gt; &gt; about local baryon density fluctuations at freeze-out, providing
&gt; &gt; insights into the final state nucleon-nucleon (N−N) interaction.
&gt; &gt; Hyper-nuclei, on the other hand, offer access to the hyperon-nucleon
&gt; &gt; (Y−N) interaction.
&gt; &gt;
&gt; &gt; "mainly because of it is genuinely sensitive to early collision
&gt; &gt; dynamics."
&gt; &gt; --&gt; primarily due to its sensitivity to the early dynamics of
the
&gt; &gt; collision.
&gt; &gt;
&gt; &gt; "The first harmonic coefficients" --&gt; The first harmonic
coefficient
&gt; &gt; .... called the directed flow (v1), has been analyzed using
different
&gt; &gt; particle species.
&gt; &gt;
&gt; &gt; 2 Experiment and data analysis
&gt; &gt; --------------------
&gt; &gt; "setup in 2018 for the center-of-mass energy √sNN = 3.0 GeV, in 2019
&gt; &gt; for 3.2 GeV, in 2020 for 3.5 GeV and 3.9 GeV"
&gt; &gt; --&gt; setup during 2018-2020 for the center-of-mass energies at
√sNN =
&gt; &gt; 3.0, 3.2, and 3.9 GeV
&gt; &gt;
&gt; &gt; "The main charged-particle tracking and particle identification
&gt; &gt; detectors are the Time Projection Chamber (TPC) [11] and the
&gt; &gt; Time-of-Flight (TOF) barrel [12] placed inside a 0.5 T solenoidal
&gt; &gt; magnetic field along the beam direction."
&gt; &gt; --&gt; I think you can split it into two sentence: TPC is used for
&gt; &gt; tracking, while a combination of TPC=TOF is used for PID.
&gt; &gt;
&gt; &gt; " In order to balance the..."
&gt; &gt; --&gt; I suggest to rewrite something like: In order to achieve
better
&gt; &gt; precision, ....
&gt; &gt;
&gt; &gt; "Fig.1 shows the reconstructed invariant mass distributions for 3ΛH
&gt; &gt; and 4ΛH 2-body decay with topological cuts and phase space cut of
3.2,
&gt; &gt; 3.5 and 3.9 GeV, and obvious hyper-nuclei signals with good
&gt; &gt; significance can be observed."
&gt; &gt; --&gt; Fig.1 shows the reconstructed invariant mass distributions
for 3ΛH
&gt; &gt; and 4ΛH 2-body decay using phase space listed in Table 1 for 3.2,
3.5
&gt; &gt; and 3.9 GeV. Combinatorial backgrounds for hyper-nuclei are
&gt; &gt; constructed by rotating decay daughter particles through a random
&gt; &gt; angle between 10◦ and 350◦. The signal is fitted with a Gaussian
plus
&gt; &gt; a linear function ....
&gt; &gt;
&gt; &gt; "Due to the collective flow dependent on the pT range, "
&gt; &gt; --&gt; Since the collective flow depends on the pT range of particle
&gt; &gt; species, for a meaningful comparison we use same pT /A range when
&gt; &gt; comparing different species and it is listed in Table-1.
&gt; &gt;
&gt; &gt; "Due to the statistics is poor for 3 ΛH and 4ΛH...."
&gt; &gt; --&gt; Due to limited statistics for 3 ΛH and 4ΛH
&gt; &gt;
&gt; &gt; " In all this fit, zero point (0,0) is forced going through, taking
&gt; &gt; the advantage of the symmetry"
&gt; &gt; --&gt; In all the above cases, the fit is constrained to pass
through
&gt; &gt; (0,0) taking the advantage of the symmetry.
&gt; &gt;
&gt; &gt; "arising from the particle misidentification determined by varying
the
&gt; &gt; cuts on z and m2"
&gt; &gt; --&gt; arising from the particle misidentification.
&gt; &gt; Here z and m2 are not defined.
&gt; &gt;
&gt; &gt;
&gt; &gt;
&gt; &gt; 3 Results and Discussion
&gt; &gt; --------------------
&gt; &gt; "For comparison, the hadronic transport model (JAM2) with
coalescence
&gt; &gt; afterburner calculations are also added, which is consistent with
&gt; &gt; observed energy dependence."
&gt; &gt; --&gt; The hadronic transport model (JAM2) with coalescence
afterburner
&gt; &gt; calculations are consistent with observed energy dependence.
&gt; &gt;
&gt; &gt;
&gt; &gt; 4 Summary
&gt; &gt; --------------------
&gt; &gt; "In this paper we report the collision energy and particle mass of
the
&gt; &gt; directed flow"
&gt; &gt; --&gt; In these proceedings, we report the collision energy and
particle
&gt; &gt; mass dependence of the directed flow (v1) ... at in 3.0, 3.2, 3.5
and
&gt; &gt; 3.9 GeV ...
&gt; &gt;
&gt; &gt; "Calculations of hadronic transport model plus coalescence
afterburner
&gt; &gt; .... "
&gt; &gt; --&gt; Calculations of hadronic transport JAM model with a
coalescence
&gt; &gt; afterburner can qualitatively reproduce the observed dependence for
&gt; &gt; hyper-nuclei as well as light-nuclei collective flow measurements.
It
&gt; &gt; suggests that the dominant process in the underlying production
&gt; &gt; mechanism for light clusters is the coalescence process.
&gt; &gt;
&gt; &gt; "The STAR experiment has collected 2 billion events for the 3.0 GeV
Au
&gt; &gt; + Au collisions which will help us to further constrain coalescence
&gt; &gt; parameters for both light- and hyper-nuclei at the high density
&gt; &gt; region."
&gt; &gt; --&gt; Moreover, results from a high statistics 2 billion event
samples
&gt; &gt; for the 3.0 GeV Au + Au collisions will significantly enhance the
&gt; &gt; precision and help constrain coalescence parameters for both light-
&gt; &gt; and hyper-nuclei at the high density region.
&gt; &gt;
&gt; &gt;
&gt; &gt; Thanks and regards,
&gt; &gt; Subhash
&gt; &gt;
&gt; &gt;
&gt; &gt; On 2023-11-23 01:42 PM, webmaster--- via Star-fcv-l wrote:
&gt; &gt;&gt; Dear star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
&gt; &gt;&gt;
&gt; &gt;&gt; Chengdong Han (chdhan AT impcas.ac.cn) has submitted a material
for a
&gt; &gt;&gt; review,
&gt; &gt;&gt; please have a look:
&gt; &gt;&gt; https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/66064
&gt; &gt;&gt;
&gt; &gt;&gt; ---
&gt; &gt;&gt; If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
&gt; &gt;&gt; webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
&gt; &gt;&gt; _______________________________________________
&gt; &gt;&gt; Star-fcv-l mailing list
&gt; &gt;&gt; Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
&gt; &gt;&gt; https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
&gt; &gt; _______________________________________________
&gt; &gt; Star-fcv-l mailing list
&gt; &gt; Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
&gt; &gt; https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
&gt; _______________________________________________
&gt; Star-fcv-l mailing list
&gt; Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
&gt; https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
</subhash AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov></star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov></star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov>


Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page