STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG

[sharangrav <sharangrav AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>]

Dear Prithwish,

Thank you very much for your valuable comments. Here is the link to my 
updated presentaion slides.
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/presentations/EMMI-Workshop-Probing-dense-baryonic-matter-hadrons-II-FAIR-Phase-0/Overview-fixed-tar
I have also included the references for the previous STAR talks on my 
slides.
Please let me know if you have any further comments.

Thanks and regards,
Sharang

On 2024-02-12 22:30, webmaster--- via Star-fcv-l wrote:
> Dear star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
>
> Prithwish Tribedy ( ptribedy AT bnl.gov ) has commented on a material 
> originally
> submitted by Sharang Rav Sharma ( 
> sharang.rav AT students.iisertirupati.ac.in )
> at
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/presentations/EMMI-Workshop-Probing-dense-baryonic-matter-hadrons-II-FAIR-Phase-0/Overview-fixed-tar
>
> Comment:
> Very nice slides. It seems you put a lot of efforts in making these 
> results
> to create this review talk -- good job. Some of your slides are heavy. 
> I hope
> you will have time to cover them all. A few of your slides lack 
> references to
> preliminary data (you have to cite previous STAR talks). Also, consider
> adding a highlight sentence (in color) if you think a slide will take 
> too
> long. I leave it to you.
>
> I sign off with a few comments.
>
> Slide#4:
> "Enlarged rapidity acceptance" --> "Extended pseudorapidity acceptance"
> "Extends η coverage from 1.0 to 1.5" --> "Extends η coverage from 
> ±1.0 to
> ±1.5"
> Slide#6:
> "Two main detectors" --> "Two detectors"
> Slide#8:
> "event-by-event fluctuations,"-->"event-by-event geometry and 
> fluctuations,"
> Slide#10:
> "increases in magnitude with increasing rapidity" --> "increases in 
> magnitude
> with increasing rapidity for most particle species"
> "Magnitude of v 1 increases with increasing mass of the particle" -->
> "Magnitude of v1 has a strong particle species dependence"
> Slide#11:
> I don't understand this statement:
> "v1 slope decreases in magnitude as collision energy increases --> 
> Stronger
> tilted expansion."
> Do you mean v1 slope decrease is due to more boost invariant structure 
> of 3D
> geometry at higher energies ? This would not mean stronger tilt,
> it would mean less tilt in a given slice of rapidity.
>
> After this "Strong mean field at high baryon density region" add "(at 
> lower
> energies)"
>
> Slide#12:
> After the first bullet on about negative slope add "at low pT"
> Slide#13:
> The right plot needs a reference for the preliminary results
>
> Slide#18:
> Needs a reference. "Disappearance of partonic collectivity" --> 
> "Possible
> indication of the disappearance of partonic collectivity"
>
> Slide#22:
> "Geometry drives v3(\psi_1)" --> "strong geometric effect"
> You should use this as your first bullet : "geometry drives v3(\psi_1)"
> because non-zero v3(\psi_1) is already an indication of geometry driven
> v3(\Psi_1)
>
> Slide#24:
> "from coalescence mechanism" --> "from coalescence of nucleons"
>
> Slide#27:
> Needs a reference to STAR results (Ben's QM 2022 talk maybe)
>
> Slide#30:
> "Larger v_3{\Psi_1} for peripheral than central collisions" --> 
> "Nonzero
> v_3{\Psi_1}, stronger in peripheral than central collisions"
> "observed p T spectra" --> "observed for p_T spectra"
> "indicating less baryon stopping" -->"indicating centrality-dependent 
> baryon
> stopping"
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---
> If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
> webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
>
> _______________________________________________
> Star-fcv-l mailing list
> Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l