Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

star-fcv-l - Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Emmy Duckworth for CPOD 2024 got commented by Zhenyu Chen

star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: subhash <subhash AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>
  • To: "STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG" <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
  • Subject: Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Emmy Duckworth for CPOD 2024 got commented by Zhenyu Chen
  • Date: Sun, 19 May 2024 10:51:11 +0800

Dear Emmy,


Nice slides. I have a few additional comments below:

s#12: You can add reference of flow method paper.
Fix the legend remove the underscore and some of the nomenclatures like flattened can be written as final.

s#13: Bottom plot should be improved, please add proper labels on the plot, Y-axis, X-axis (shifted) etc
You have mentioned that you are weighting with raw v1, but the top-panels are corrected one, I guess. Then don't you use that one.

s#17: Somewhere inside the figure, please indicate the kinematic cuts (pt or momentum cuts) and linear fit with fit range.

Why the proton v1, especially at 7.7 GeV is so different? Is there any difference in acceptance cut. BES-2 systematic is of similar order to that of BEs-1 ! I am asking because you are saying significant in accuracy in first bullet. But it doesn't look so.


s#19, 21: same as #17, indicate kinematic cuts.

back up: I don't think we usually show the systematic checks or tables outside STAR. please remove those. They are very technical and STAR internal.

A Policy reminder: As per STAR policy you should post your slides to Drupal at least two weeks before deadline so that we have enough time to review your slides.

Thanks and regards,
Subhash



On 2024-05-18 11:43 AM, webmaster--- via Star-fcv-l wrote:
Dear star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,

Zhenyu Chen ( zhenyuchen AT sdu.edu.cn ) has commented on a material originally
submitted by Emmy Duckworth ( educkwor AT kent.edu ) at
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/presentations/CPOD-2024/Proton-Directed-Flow-Beam-Energy-Scan-II

Comment:
Nice slides. I sign off with few suggestions:
- Slide4: make the 2nd and 3rd equation larger for visibility
- Slide13: "some energies", please be more specific
- Slide14: highly pure signals -> high purity signals
- Slide22: define "reduced rapidity" since it is in summary; Eos -> EOS

---
If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
_______________________________________________
Star-fcv-l mailing list
Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page