STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG

[psinha <psinha AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>]

Dear Conveners,

Thank you for the helpful suggestions and comments. I have incorporated 
all the suggestions accordingly. Please find the updated slides at the 
link below.
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/presentations/AUM-2024/Highlights-STAR-experiment-flow-measurements

Kindly let me know about any more suggestions on the same.

Sincerely,
Priyanshi

On 2024-05-28 06:49, subhash via Star-fcv-l wrote:
> Dear Priyanshi,
>
> Nice slides. Thanks for putting together all these results. I have a
> few suggestions below for your consideration:
>
> Title: How about: "Highlights on flow measurements from the STAR 
> experiment"?
> s#3: You can hight the STAR upgraded detectors here;
> s#4: The text next to triangular flow seems slightly cut off, please 
> check.
> s#6: Suggest moving the top-corner bullet to the bottom, (IMO this is
> the main observation of energy dependence of splitting, at the corner
> it seems off the focus)
> "Could be due to longer EM field" --> Could be due to longer lived EM
> field and shorter lifetime of fireball
> I would suggest referring to our recent STAR PRX paper.
> s#7: Consider referring to EPD acceptance which makes possible
> measuring v1 over 10 units of rapidity
> I would suggest switching order of #6 and #7; First discuss on tte
> charged hadron, the identified particles.
> s#8: breaking of scaling or scale breaking (?); You can pick up the
> latest plot from Emmy's CPOD-2024 presentation.
> s#9: It looks a busy slide; So consider showing v2, v3 first on top
> then their scaling on the bottom to have a natural flow;
> s#12: You probably need a rephrase of bullets;
> The left bullet, you should be explicit that anti-flow observed for
> kaons at AGS (As per my understanding).
> While from our BES FXT, we have seen low-pT anti-flow signals of both
> pions, kaons and kshort which can be explained nuclear shadowing using
> JAM (kaon anti flow is not unique); IMO, this is the new observation
> you should focus on. Please see Shusu's recent SQM-2024 slides;
> s#13: I think you should also add NCQ scaling become a gradually
> better above 3.2 GeV;
> Consider adding a reference to STAR 3 GeV PLB vn paper;
> s#14: The 3 GeV points should be the published, isn't it?; Also add
> the reference to the recent 3 GeV FXT proton v3 PRC paper;
> Check the typo on preliminary inside the figure;
> s#19: Can you rephrase: "Gluon fluctuation around quark modelling"
> s#20: strange hadrons' flow;
>  isobar collisions (Ru+Ru and Zr+Zr);
> s#21: Can you rephrase the last two bullets. I think you mean v2
> ratios are used to constrain initial conditions and nuclear structure
> in models (?)
> add reference to STAR recent arXived deformation paper ie submitted to 
> Nature.
> s#22: Probably, you can group the bullets (e.g. coalescence mechanism
> at work for PID and light nuclei); you don't need to mention all of
> them, keep the most important ones;
>
>
> Thanks and regards,
> Subhash
>
>
>
>
>
> On 2024-05-28 01:54 AM, webmaster--- via Star-fcv-l wrote:
> > Dear star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
> >
> > Priyanshi Sinha (priyanshisinha AT students.iisertirupati.ac.in) has 
> > submitted a
> > material for a review, please have a look:
> > https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/67983
> >
> > Deadline: 2024-06-11
> > ---
> > If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
> > webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
> > _______________________________________________
> > Star-fcv-l mailing list
> > Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
> _______________________________________________
> Star-fcv-l mailing list
> Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l