STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG

[Prithwish Tribedy <ptribedy AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>]

Hi Yicheng,
  Nice slides. Please consider some minor text suggestions. I sign off 
with these implemented.
Note that the audience for this talk would be a bit diverse, so try 
spelling things out.

Slide#6:
Somewhere after first bullet add "v1 slope: ..."
"Mean field model predicts" --> "Mean field models predict"


Slide#7:
"hadron flows follow" --> "hadrons follow"

Slide#9:
After "with high precision" consider adding "(improved statistics & 
event plane resolution)"

Slide#12:
Title, how about "CME signal extraction: SP/PP comparison method"
"to those two planes" --> "SP & PP"

Slide#13:
Title, how about "The isobar experiment" --> "The isobar collision: CME 
upper limit"

Summary:
consider revising:
"STAR continues producing results of great impact for important physics 
on QCD"
-->
"STAR continues producing impactful results covering key aspects of hot 
QCD"

Edit the next line to something like this:
"this talk focuses on recent studies related to flow, vorticity, and 
chirality"
-->
"This talk focuses on selected recent studies on flow, vorticity, and 
chirality, amid numerous other key findings"

Overall, nice and forward looking, along with STAR BUR it would be good 
add the Hot & town hall meeting
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2303.17254
https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.02579


Best,
Prithwish


On 2024-08-21 05:45, webmaster AT star.bnl.gov wrote:
> Dear star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
>
> Subhash Singha ( connectsubhash AT gmail.com ) has commented on a material
> originally submitted by Yicheng Feng ( feng216 AT purdue.edu ) at
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/presentations/ICNFP-2024/Overview-STAR-measurements-flow-chirality-and-vorticity
>
> Comment:
> Dear Yicheng,
>
> Nice slides. I am signing off and pushing it to star talks with a few 
> minor
> suggestions:
>
> s#6: flat scale --> scales or scales with y/y_beam ...
> deviate --> deviate from scaling
>
> Since we don't have model for higher energies here, I think we can 
> remove
> "but higher → data to constraint model EOS".
> I was wondering does the "baryon inhomogeneities" paper has any 
> connection
> with this excess proton v1, if not we can remove it from the footer?
>
> s#7: may be rephrased to something like gradual breaking of NCQ scaling
>
> s#9: updates from BES-II
>
>
>
>
> ---
> If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
> webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov