STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG

[Richard Seto <seto AT ucr.edu>]

Hi Farhan (is that the right way to address you?)

I have a few comments and then I sign off - but as a new convener - Subash will do the final sign-off as I don’t have the access yet.

Most of the is just wording 

Line 43. - rewire to

Previous studies by the STAR collaboration on Delta (dv1/dy) in Au+Au collusions at sort(sin)=27 GeV, as well and Au+Au and isobar collisions at top RHIC energy (sort(Snn)=200 GeV) are consistent with the expectation from the dominance of the Faraday and Coulomb effects in peripheral collisions [3,8]

L54 : linear function “y=mx” -> linear fit

L58 delete kill “as well as v1 dependence on system size” 

 (You make the comment about system size in the next line

L65 “is proton” -> “for the proton”

L72 (as we go down in the beam energy) -> as the bream energy is reduced 

i.e. reword and kill the ()

L76 keep -> keeps

 “Contrary” -> “contrast”

L83 

“Align” -> “collisions is consistent”

-Rich

Richard Seto
richard.seto AT ucr.edu
Department of Physics and Astronomy
University of California, Riverside
Riverside, CA 92521

On Aug 23, 2024, at 3:20 AM, Muhammad Farhan Taseer (via star-fcv-l Mailing List) <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:

Dear Convenors,

                           I have uploaded SQM 2-24 proceedings for STAR approval. My proceedings can be found at the following link: "https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/blog/mftaseer/SQM-20204-Proceeding-Measurement-charge-dependent-directed-flow-STAR-Beam-Energy-Scan-"

Regards

Muhammad Farhan Taseer

Institute of Modern Physics,

CAS, Lanzhou, China.