STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG

[webmaster AT star.bnl.gov]

Dear star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,

Subhash Singha ( connectsubhash AT gmail.com ) has commented on a material  
originally submitted by ChunJian Zhang ( chunjianzhang AT fudan.edu.cn ) at
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/presentations/NN2024/Imaging-collective-structure-atomic-nuclei-high-energy-nuclear-collisions-STAR-

Comment:
Dear Chunjian,
Nicely written proceedings. I have a few suggestions for your consideration:

Abstract:How about "initial conditions, influenced by the nuclear structure  
of colliding ions" --> initial conditions, where the nuclear structure of the 
 
colliding ions plays a significant role."collisions of 96Ru and 96Zr"  
--> collisions of 96Ru+96Ru and 96Zr+96Zr

l#36-47:Â "As shown in the talk" -->Â As discussed in [5, 6] ..."the signals  
of ...are much enhanced ... Au+Au" --> the signals of ... and ... in most  
central U+U collisions are enhanced compared to that in Au+Au  
collisions."These two systems’ A are nearly same but with completely  
different atomic shapes." -->Â These two systems have nearly the same mass  
number (A) but completely different atomic shapes, with 197Au nuclei having a 
 
slightly oblate shape (8)."Final state effects ... from initial conditions."  
-->Â As a result, taking ratios between these two collision systems almost  
completely cancels out final state effects, leaving model uncertainties  
primarily due to initial conditions."results from Au+Au remain positive  
throughout" --> "results from Au+Au remain positive throughout the  
centralities"
l#48-63:Â 
"the measurements provide capability" -->Â these measurements provide  
capability"The results are remarkably consistent with that low energy  
measurement with confirming that  the 238U are largely deformed " --> The 
 
results are remarkably consistent with that of the low-energy measurement,  
confirming that 238U is largely deformed.
l#64-75:the final state ....canceled .... -->Â the final state effects are  
completely canceled by taking ratios. "ratio of any observable must be due  
to differences " --> To be precise we write above observables or  
flow-correlation observables instead of any observables (?)
l#90-108:
At present ....hampered -->Â Currently, quantitative evaluations of  
longitudinal fluctuations are still limited.

I sign-off with these addressed.

---
If you have any problems with the review process, please contact  
webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov