STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG

[subhash <subhash AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>]

Dear Farhan,

Thanks for sharing. I am good with changes made in the present version.

Regards,
Subhash

On 2024-11-18 02:29 PM, Muhammad Farhan Taseer wrote:
> Hi Subhash, all,
> I have uploaded the proceedings again. You can see at the following
> link:
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/presentations/SQM-2024/Measurement-charge-dependent-directed-flow-STAR-Beam-Energy-Scan-BES-II-AuA-2
>
> In addition, the referee comments were as follows:
>
> ----------- REVIEWER 1: Larger fonts in all figures would help: as it
> is - it is very difficult to reads. Besides that, the paper is very
> good.
>
>  ----------- REVIEWER 2: Abstract: The title, abstract, and summary
> refer to (probably) all the results presented at the conference,
> whereas only a fraction of them are discussed/presented in the body of
> the article. In principle, the title suggests results from the BES-II
> energy scan, but only the highest energies (193 GeV, 200 GeV) are
> presented. I recommend changing the title, abstract, and summary so
> that they reflect the content of the article. Figures: Legends, axis
> descriptions, and axis numbers are too small in most figures, but in
> many places they can be easily enlarged. *** The legends and the "STAR
> Preliminary" text suggest that all results (U+U, Au+Au, Ru+Ru, Zr+Zr)
> are preliminary, in reality probably only the U+U data are not
> published. This should be somehow indicated in the legends and figure
> captions. *** Since pT and p are not defined, I suggest to add a
> sentence at the end of caption of Fig. 1: “Transverse momentum (pT)
> and total momentum in collision center-of-mass frame (p) are specified
> in figure legends”. *** It also looks nicer to finish figure
> captions with dots.
>
> Figures: Legends, axis descriptions, and axis numbers are too small in
> most figures, but in many places they can be easily enlarged. *** The
> legends and the "STAR Preliminary" text suggest that all results (U+U,
> Au+Au, Ru+Ru, Zr+Zr) are preliminary, in reality probably only the U+U
> data are not published. This should be somehow indicated in the
> legends and figure captions. *** Since pT and p are not defined, I
> suggest to add a sentence at the end of caption of Fig. 1:
> “Transverse momentum (pT) and total momentum in collision
> center-of-mass frame (p) are specified in figure legends”. *** It
> also looks nicer to finish figure captions with dots.
>
> Extra comments: page 3: „Figure 2 presents v1 slope … different
> colliding species.” → a part of this fragment concerns v1 (not a
> slope of dv1/dy) so it is either a mistake or the text fragment
> describes a different figure (not shown in the article?) *** Last
> paragraph of page 3: New symbol Delta(v1) is used (in three lines)
> which was not introduced before. Should it be Delta(dv1/dy)? *** Delta
> pi, Delta K, Delta p notations (inside figures) are also not clear; I
> would keep (pi+ - pi-), (K+ - K-), and (p - anti-p) only. *** The last
> two sentences on page 3 are not clear: No significant v1 splitting…
> → No significant dv1/dy splitting (??) *** A similar … → not
> clear to what the data points are consistent … → not clear with
> what *** The vertical axis of Fig. 4, figure caption, and the first
> paragraph on page 4: symbols Delta v1, Delta(v1), Delta v1 (pT) were
> not defined. Should be Delta(dv1/dy)??
>
> In the title: Collisions → collisions *** page 1: heavy ion
> collisions / heavy-ion collisions → should be unified *** page 1,
> last paragraph: positive and negative charged particles → positively
> and negatively charged particles *** page 1, last sentence; page 3,
> the first sentence of the last paragraph: [4] → ~[4] (to move it to
> the previous line) *** page 2, 1st paragraph, to be considered: STAR
> collaboration → STAR Collaboration (for consistency with page 1) **
> in different → by different *** page 2: Dataset and Events Selection
> → Dataset and event selection *** The data analyzed in this work is
> recorded → The data set analyzed in this work was recorded *** at
> Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider → at the Relativistic Heavy Ion
> Collider *** triggered events are analyzed → triggered events were
> analyzed *** particle tracking within |η| < 1 → particle tracking
> within pseudorapidity |η| < 1 *** described in [4]. → described in
> Ref. [4]. *** Results and Discussions → Results and discussion ***
> (-0.8 < y < 0.8) → (-0.8 < $y$ < 0.8) *** v1 (y) measured in this
> work → v1 (y) measured in this work for U+U *** References: ** [3]
> Heinz Sorge → H. Sorge *** [7] Bo{\.z}ek (Bożek) ** [9] arXiv:
> 2304.02831 (2023)→ arXiv:2304.02831 (no space, no year) *** [10]
> arXiv:2305.8806 → one zero is missing, it should be 2305.08806
>
> Thank You!
>
>  Regards
>
>  Muhammad Farhan Taseer
>  Institute of Modern Physics,CAS, Lanzhou, China.
>
>  On Monday, 18 November 2024 at 02:04:20 pm GMT+8, subhash
> <subhash AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov> wrote:
>
> Dear Farhan,
>
> Can you please also share the comments from referees? I can't open the
>
> link where you submitted the proceedings, can you check or re-upload
> it.
>
> Thanks and regards,
> Subhash
>
> On 2024-10-31 04:45 PM, Muhammad Farhan Taseer wrote:
> > Dear Convenors,
> >
> >                  I have updated the SQM 2024 proceedings after
> referee
> > comments and sending it again to STAR for approval. My proceedings
> can
> > be found at the following link:
> "https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/presentations/SQM-2024/Measurement-charge-dependent-directed-flow-STAR-Beam-Energy-Scan-BES-II-AuA-2";.
> > The main comment raised by referee is that the title, abstract and
> > summary states that both U+U and Au+Au data is presented in the
> > conference whereas, only U+U results are shown in the paper. So,
> > within the page limits, I have replaced the pt dependence plot with
> > Beam Energy dependence plot of Delta (dv1/dy) in BES-II Au+Au
> > collisions in order to show both results.
> >
> > Please approve this proceeding, so I can resubmit it in SQM data
> base.
> > Thank You!
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Muhammad Farhan Taseer
> > Institute of Modern Physics,CAS, Lanzhou, China.