Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

star-fcv-l - Re: [[Star-fcv-l] ] STAR presentation by Prabhupada Dixit for 10th Asian Triangle Heavy-Io... got commented by Subhash Singha

star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: pdixit <pdixit AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>
  • To: star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
  • Cc: webmaster AT star.bnl.gov
  • Subject: Re: [[Star-fcv-l] ] STAR presentation by Prabhupada Dixit for 10th Asian Triangle Heavy-Io... got commented by Subhash Singha
  • Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2025 19:11:53 +0530

Dear Subhash,
Thanks for your nice suggestions. I have implemented them in the new version.
The latest version: https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/ATHIC_presentation_v2.pdf
Answers to some of your comments are given below:
s#6: you can have one slide on v2 calculation method, EP resolution etc
before showing the final result
I have a flash talk of 7 minutes only including Q&A that's why I prefer to show only motivation and recent results without going into details of analysis procedure. Let me know what is your thought? If you suggest further I will add analysis details.
BTW, for collider energies why are you showing only 19.6 GeV? Can you add a
statement or show that for other COL BES-II energies, NCQ scaling holds?
I have added one more slide showing 14.6 GeV results. Other energies are not yet preliminary accepted.

regards,
Prabhupada

On 2025-01-03 13:54, webmaster AT star.bnl.gov wrote:
Dear star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,

Subhash Singha ( connectsubhash AT gmail.com ) has commented on a material
originally submitted by Prabhupada Dixit ( prabhupadad AT iiserbpr.ac.in ) at
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/presentations/10th-Asian-Triangle-Heavy-Ion-Conference-ATHIC-2025/Searching-Turn-Signature-QGP-Aniso

Comment:
Dear Prabhupada, Nice slides. I have a few suggestions for your
consideration:

Consider adding slide numbers.
s#3: First bullet--> driven by Initial spatial spatial anisotropy
Second bullet: driven by the fluctuation in the position of the participant
nucleons (geometric fluctuation)
s#4: signature of partonic collectivity
s#5: STAR detector
s#6: you can have one slide on v2 calculation method, EP resolution etc
before showing the final result

BTW, for collider energies why are you showing only 19.6 GeV? Can you add a
statement or show that for other COL BES-II energies, NCQ scaling holds?

---
If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page