Star-fst-l mailing list

[Zhenyu Ye <yezhenyu2003 AT gmail.com>]

Hi Gerard,  Tonko,

Gerard’s numbers look correct to me. We don’t have detector modules connected 
to the ARMs now. In order to take data and examine the status of ARCs and 
ARMs, I guess we need to connect our spare IST modules and test the ARMs 
one-by-one. Is this the plan?

Best,
Zhenyu

> On May 21, 2019, at 11:20 AM, Gerard Visser <gvisser AT indiana.edu> wrote:
> 
> hi Tonko,
>    Almost. Your channel counts are correct as far as I know (Except you 
> meant 36864 = 288*128.) However, the APV's will be organized as 8 per group 
> instead of 12 per group, owing to the detector/frontend configuration. So 
> there will be 36 groups, which will be read out with 6 crate segments (6 
> ARC) and 3 ARM per crate segment with 2 cable groups per ARM (as usual). 6 
> ARC, 18 ARM in total.
>    For sure I hope to test the readout during the summer, and we should 
> coordinate on that. September sounds fine to me.
> 
>    Gerard
> 
> 
>> On 5/21/2019 12:03 PM, Tonko Ljubicic wrote:
>> Hello,
>> I'm iterating through the readout/DAQ requirements for FST.
>> From previous discussions this is what I have:
>> 1) 3 ARM/ARC crates
>> 2) 2 ARCs per crate (total 6)
>> 3) 2 ARMs per ARC (or 4 per crate, 12 in total)
>> 4) 36854 channels all-in-all
>> Are these number still correct??
>> Perhaps in September I will try to power-up the relevant
>> ARC/ARM crates in STAR as well as the DAQ PCs and
>> see if we can take data with the above geometry.
>> Thoughts?
>>            -- Tonko
> _______________________________________________
> Star-fst-l mailing list
> Star-fst-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fst-l