star-fst-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: Star-fst-l mailing list
List archive
- From: videbaek <videbaek AT bnl.gov>
- To: "Zhang, Shenghui" <shenghui AT uic.edu>
- Cc: Star-fst L <star-fst-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
- Subject: Re: [Star-fst-l] Offline software
- Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2021 18:58:14 -0400
Hi Shenghui,
Thanks for posting the slides and all the work that went into this.
Some of the code snippets are hard to read from slides though.
I have a couple of comments/questions:
i) Open questions:
--- The Topo map is used for mid-rapidity tracking and is not relevant for FST,sTGC and FCS.
There maybe a need for something similar for the forward tracking. Daniel?
ome of the other Ist related stuff may be for mi-d-rapidity tracking.
ii) slide 7
How are this calculations and tables related to what is implemented for the DAQ code? The DAQ code needs this info right away
and this cannot be redone later (pedestal, CMN etc) except for a subset of events. This was done for IST in the late stages, but is planed to be
done online for FST. I think this needs some discussion.
iii) It would be good to have a writeup on definitions of the coordinate transformations that are needed. I know its being implemented in
the geometry descriptions, but it has to be used in the HitMakers and should be well understood. You say the calibrationMakecreated the CMN data, but thats too late. as it's applied in the online DAQ. How is this coordinated?
iv) I think som more thought should go into marking bad channels , apv chips as this is already need for online. We shoud not have two diffrent sources for this.
) StFstHit
-- looks ok if one chekcs what's already in StHit; It would be usefull in the comments to define units, and precise definitions.E.g. the is
a size in Z directions (units ..) . I guess this comes from segmentation in 4 radial segments of the sensors not Z which is nominal along the beam. How is charge uncertainty evaluated. I guess one can read the code, but general brief descriptions will be good.
slide 11)
- why is the collection split over sensors. I would guess you need to access it on a per wedge(or mybe even ring) when matching hits, but this
of course depends how genfit wants the hits presented.The data structure layout should math what is needed in tracking, and it may be different
for the forward tracking than for mid-rapidity with HFT.
best Flemming
On 2021-10-20 05:01, Zhang, Shenghui wrote:
Hi all,
Please find the detailed information of FST offline software below:
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/FST_Software_Status_10202021.pdf
Any comments, suggetions or questions?
The codes have been uploded to RCF:
/star/u/shenghui/shenghui/FST/offline/StRoot/
Best,
Shenghui
_______________________________________________
Star-fst-l mailing list
Star-fst-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fst-l
--
Flemming Videbaek
senior scientist
videbaek @ bnl.gov
Brookhaven National Lab
Physics Department
Bldg 510D
Upton, NY 11973
phone: 631-344-4106
cell : 631-681-1596
-
[Star-fst-l] Offline software,
Zhang, Shenghui, 10/20/2021
-
Re: [Star-fst-l] Offline software,
videbaek, 10/21/2021
-
Re: [Star-fst-l] Offline software,
Daniel Brandenburg, 10/22/2021
- Re: [Star-fst-l] Offline software, Xu Sun, 10/22/2021
-
Re: [Star-fst-l] Offline software,
Zhenyu Ye, 10/22/2021
- Re: [Star-fst-l] Offline software, Daniel Brandenburg, 10/23/2021
- Re: [Star-fst-l] Offline software, Zhang, Shenghui, 10/25/2021
-
Re: [Star-fst-l] Offline software,
Daniel Brandenburg, 10/22/2021
-
Re: [Star-fst-l] Offline software,
videbaek, 10/21/2021
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.