star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: STAR HardProbes PWG
List archive
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Priyanka Roy Chowdhury for Hard Probes 2023 submitted for review
- From: "Roy Chowdhury Priyanka (DOKT)" <priyanka.roy_chowdhury.dokt AT pw.edu.pl>
- To: Nihar Sahoo <nihar AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>
- Cc: STAR HardProbes PWG <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>, "webmaster AT star.bnl.gov" <webmaster AT star.bnl.gov>
- Subject: Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Priyanka Roy Chowdhury for Hard Probes 2023 submitted for review
- Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2022 13:27:13 +0000
Hello Nihar, Barbara, all
I have modified my abstract to incorporate your suggestions. You can find the modified version here https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/HP2023_abstract_Priyanka.pdf
Regards,
Priyanka
From: Nihar Sahoo <nihar AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2022 12:22 PM
To: Roy Chowdhury Priyanka (DOKT) <priyanka.roy_chowdhury.dokt AT pw.edu.pl>
Cc: webmaster AT star.bnl.gov <webmaster AT star.bnl.gov>; STAR HardProbes PWG <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>; Barbara Trzeciak <barbara.trzeciak AT gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Priyanka Roy Chowdhury for Hard Probes 2023 submitted for review
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2022 12:22 PM
To: Roy Chowdhury Priyanka (DOKT) <priyanka.roy_chowdhury.dokt AT pw.edu.pl>
Cc: webmaster AT star.bnl.gov <webmaster AT star.bnl.gov>; STAR HardProbes PWG <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>; Barbara Trzeciak <barbara.trzeciak AT gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Priyanka Roy Chowdhury for Hard Probes 2023 submitted for review
Hello Priyanka,
Thank you for implementing my comments and correcting me.
Please upload your new version here (do not send in the attachment)
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/61809
> of " low relative momentum": For femtoscopic correlation, 'relative
> momentum' (k*) is from the reference of relative momentum between two
> particles for which pair we calculate correlation function C(k*).
Yes, you are correct. Never mind to that.
I have a few additional comment on your updated abstract. With
implementing these I sign off.
1) "Due to large mass, the charm quarks are produced early in the
relativistic heavy-ion reactions…"
It doesn't sound good. (because Charm quarks are produced early in the
collision "not" because they are heavy but they come mainly from hard
scattering)
"The heavy quarks—-like charm quarks—-are produced early in the
relativistic heavy-ion collisions…"
How about this?
2) "…in the high-statistics Au-Au collision (run 2014) at √sNN =200 GeV
at the STAR experiment." -> "...in Au-Au collisions at sqrt(sNN)=200 GeV
data taken in the year 2014." (high-statistics not required.)
3) "reconstructed at via the K--π+ decays using topological
reconstruction enabled by the excellent…
" -> "reconstructed via the K^{-}- π+ decay channel using topological
criteria enabled by the excellent…"
(Just to avoid "reconstructed" and "reconstruction" in the same
sentence)
4) "Hadrons are selected and identified…" -> "Hadrons are
identified…using Time-of-Flight and time projection chamber detectors."
Cheers
Nihar
On 2022-11-28 20:31, Roy Chowdhury Priyanka (DOKT) wrote:
> Hello Barbara and Nihar,
>
> Thanks for your comments and feedback.
>
> Here's a clarification regarding the motivation of the analysis
> (asked by Barbara).
>
> Explanation: Two-particle femtoscopic correlation is a useful method
> to study the Debye screening length of c/cquarks within the QGP
> medium. By fitting the analytical result into the suitable model (ex.
> Lednicky & Lyuboshitz), source size can be calculated. For strong
> correlation, the source size is expected lower than the size of the
> fireball and vice-versa.
>
> If required, I can add this explanation to my abstract.
>
> Regarding the suggestion by Nihar, " relatively low momentum" instead
> of " low relative momentum": For femtoscopic correlation, 'relative
> momentum' (k*) is from the reference of relative momentum between two
> particles for which pair we calculate correlation function C(k*).
>
> I tried to address all your suggestions. Please check my modified
> abstract attached here.
>
> Regards,
>
> Priyanka
>
> -------------------------
>
> From: Star-hp-l <star-hp-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov> on behalf of Nihar
> Sahoo via Star-hp-l <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
> Sent: Sunday, November 27, 2022 12:16 PM
> To: webmaster AT star.bnl.gov <webmaster AT star.bnl.gov>; STAR HardProbes
> PWG <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
> Subject: Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Priyanka Roy Chowdhury
> for Hard Probes 2023 submitted for review
>
> Hello Priyanka,
>
> Please find my comment on your nice abstract.
>
> Title: drop "registered"
>
> "Due to their large mass, charm quarks.." -> "Due to large mass, the
> charm quarks…"
> "…the created system, including…" -> "the created medium— the
> Quark
> Gluon Plasma."
> "at low relative momentum…" -> " …at relatively low momentum…"
>
> Please mention about the kinematic range of D-meson and hadrons; what
> centrality, analysis details, etc.
>
> Cheers
> Nihar
>
> On 2022-11-21 20:01, webmaster--- via Star-hp-l wrote:
>> Dear Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
>>
>> Priyanka Roy Chowdhury (priyanka.roy_chowdhury.dokt AT pw.edu.pl) has
>> submitted
>> a material for a review, please have a look:
>> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/61809
>>
>> Deadline: 2022-12-05
>> ---
>> If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
>> webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
>> _______________________________________________
>> Star-hp-l mailing list
>> Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
>> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l
> _______________________________________________
> Star-hp-l mailing list
> Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l
Thank you for implementing my comments and correcting me.
Please upload your new version here (do not send in the attachment)
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/61809
> of " low relative momentum": For femtoscopic correlation, 'relative
> momentum' (k*) is from the reference of relative momentum between two
> particles for which pair we calculate correlation function C(k*).
Yes, you are correct. Never mind to that.
I have a few additional comment on your updated abstract. With
implementing these I sign off.
1) "Due to large mass, the charm quarks are produced early in the
relativistic heavy-ion reactions…"
It doesn't sound good. (because Charm quarks are produced early in the
collision "not" because they are heavy but they come mainly from hard
scattering)
"The heavy quarks—-like charm quarks—-are produced early in the
relativistic heavy-ion collisions…"
How about this?
2) "…in the high-statistics Au-Au collision (run 2014) at √sNN =200 GeV
at the STAR experiment." -> "...in Au-Au collisions at sqrt(sNN)=200 GeV
data taken in the year 2014." (high-statistics not required.)
3) "reconstructed at via the K--π+ decays using topological
reconstruction enabled by the excellent…
" -> "reconstructed via the K^{-}- π+ decay channel using topological
criteria enabled by the excellent…"
(Just to avoid "reconstructed" and "reconstruction" in the same
sentence)
4) "Hadrons are selected and identified…" -> "Hadrons are
identified…using Time-of-Flight and time projection chamber detectors."
Cheers
Nihar
On 2022-11-28 20:31, Roy Chowdhury Priyanka (DOKT) wrote:
> Hello Barbara and Nihar,
>
> Thanks for your comments and feedback.
>
> Here's a clarification regarding the motivation of the analysis
> (asked by Barbara).
>
> Explanation: Two-particle femtoscopic correlation is a useful method
> to study the Debye screening length of c/cquarks within the QGP
> medium. By fitting the analytical result into the suitable model (ex.
> Lednicky & Lyuboshitz), source size can be calculated. For strong
> correlation, the source size is expected lower than the size of the
> fireball and vice-versa.
>
> If required, I can add this explanation to my abstract.
>
> Regarding the suggestion by Nihar, " relatively low momentum" instead
> of " low relative momentum": For femtoscopic correlation, 'relative
> momentum' (k*) is from the reference of relative momentum between two
> particles for which pair we calculate correlation function C(k*).
>
> I tried to address all your suggestions. Please check my modified
> abstract attached here.
>
> Regards,
>
> Priyanka
>
> -------------------------
>
> From: Star-hp-l <star-hp-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov> on behalf of Nihar
> Sahoo via Star-hp-l <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
> Sent: Sunday, November 27, 2022 12:16 PM
> To: webmaster AT star.bnl.gov <webmaster AT star.bnl.gov>; STAR HardProbes
> PWG <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
> Subject: Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Priyanka Roy Chowdhury
> for Hard Probes 2023 submitted for review
>
> Hello Priyanka,
>
> Please find my comment on your nice abstract.
>
> Title: drop "registered"
>
> "Due to their large mass, charm quarks.." -> "Due to large mass, the
> charm quarks…"
> "…the created system, including…" -> "the created medium— the
> Quark
> Gluon Plasma."
> "at low relative momentum…" -> " …at relatively low momentum…"
>
> Please mention about the kinematic range of D-meson and hadrons; what
> centrality, analysis details, etc.
>
> Cheers
> Nihar
>
> On 2022-11-21 20:01, webmaster--- via Star-hp-l wrote:
>> Dear Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
>>
>> Priyanka Roy Chowdhury (priyanka.roy_chowdhury.dokt AT pw.edu.pl) has
>> submitted
>> a material for a review, please have a look:
>> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/61809
>>
>> Deadline: 2022-12-05
>> ---
>> If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
>> webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
>> _______________________________________________
>> Star-hp-l mailing list
>> Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
>> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l
> _______________________________________________
> Star-hp-l mailing list
> Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l
-
[Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Priyanka Roy Chowdhury for Hard Probes 2023 submitted for review,
webmaster, 11/21/2022
- Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Priyanka Roy Chowdhury for Hard Probes 2023 submitted for review, Barbara Trzeciak, 11/25/2022
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Priyanka Roy Chowdhury for Hard Probes 2023 submitted for review,
Nihar Sahoo, 11/27/2022
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Priyanka Roy Chowdhury for Hard Probes 2023 submitted for review,
Roy Chowdhury Priyanka (DOKT), 11/28/2022
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Priyanka Roy Chowdhury for Hard Probes 2023 submitted for review,
Barbara Trzeciak, 11/28/2022
- Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Priyanka Roy Chowdhury for Hard Probes 2023 submitted for review, Barbara Trzeciak, 11/28/2022
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Priyanka Roy Chowdhury for Hard Probes 2023 submitted for review,
Kikoła Daniel, 11/29/2022
- Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Priyanka Roy Chowdhury for Hard Probes 2023 submitted for review, Barbara Trzeciak, 11/29/2022
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Priyanka Roy Chowdhury for Hard Probes 2023 submitted for review,
Nihar Sahoo, 11/29/2022
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Priyanka Roy Chowdhury for Hard Probes 2023 submitted for review,
Roy Chowdhury Priyanka (DOKT), 11/29/2022
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Priyanka Roy Chowdhury for Hard Probes 2023 submitted for review,
Sooraj Radhakrishnan, 11/29/2022
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Priyanka Roy Chowdhury for Hard Probes 2023 submitted for review,
Roy Chowdhury Priyanka (DOKT), 11/30/2022
- Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Priyanka Roy Chowdhury for Hard Probes 2023 submitted for review, Sooraj Radhakrishnan, 11/30/2022
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Priyanka Roy Chowdhury for Hard Probes 2023 submitted for review,
Roy Chowdhury Priyanka (DOKT), 11/30/2022
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Priyanka Roy Chowdhury for Hard Probes 2023 submitted for review,
Sooraj Radhakrishnan, 11/29/2022
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Priyanka Roy Chowdhury for Hard Probes 2023 submitted for review,
Roy Chowdhury Priyanka (DOKT), 11/29/2022
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Priyanka Roy Chowdhury for Hard Probes 2023 submitted for review,
Barbara Trzeciak, 11/28/2022
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Priyanka Roy Chowdhury for Hard Probes 2023 submitted for review,
Roy Chowdhury Priyanka (DOKT), 11/28/2022
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.