STAR HardProbes PWG

[Barbara Trzeciak <barbara.trzeciak AT gmail.com>]

Hi Veronica,

You can find a different version of the plot from slide 14 here:

https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/Raa_Npart.pdf

Also, could you please go again via the comments, I see that some are still to be addressed. 

Cheers,

Barbara

On Sun, Mar 26, 2023 at 6:34 PM Nihar Sahoo via Star-hp-l <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:

Hello Veronica,

On my this comment,
> Slide13:
> I would not encourage you to show these D^0 jet results because
> Diptanil showed at last collaboration >meeting that our results have
> been changed due to some track selection cut.
> I understand these are "STAR preliminary" but we now know that results
> have been changed.

I think we can still show these results outside though there is no
significant change in physics message.
And we will discuss on this topic in future hp-pwg meeting once Diptanil
updates us his detailed study in this direction.

Thank you
Nihar


On 2023-03-26 20:27, Nihar Sahoo via Star-hp-l wrote:
> Hello Veronica
>
> Thank you for this nice overview presentation.
>
> Please find my comments below.
>
> Slide2:
> Please include the references for "Lifetime …" and "Temperature…";
> It depends on different considerations so you need to cite the paper
> where you picked these numbers.
>
> What is "Slight color dipole"? "Slight"?
> quarkonium state -> quarkonium states
>
>
> Slide4:
> "Time of flight" -> Time of flight measurement
> (Because you have already used Time-of-flight at top)
>
> "…below TPC pT acceptance" -> "…at low pT" (TPC acceptance can go to
> low pT but detection not good)
>
>
> Slide8
> In this slide, you need to introduce what is "EA" and how do we
> measure in STAR briefly.
>
> within systematics -> within uncertainty
>
> Slide10:
> "Therefore, no CNM observed in J/ψ in small systems within systematics
> at
> high-pT"
> -> No CNM effect at high-pT  [better with less words]
> within systematics -> within uncertainty
>
>
> SLide12:
> "Energy loss at LHC is larger than at RHIC" How do you conclude this
> statement ?
>
>
>  Slide13:
> I would not encourage you to show these D^0 jet results because
> Diptanil showed at last collaboration meeting that our results have
> been changed due to some track selection cut.
> I understand these are "STAR preliminary" but we now know that results
> have been changed.
>
>
> SLide17:
> "No significant CNM effects at low pT in J/ψ" -> Is not that "at high
> pT" ?
> "Matched dijet asymmetry shows no angular dependence of jet energy
> loss" -> This is not in general. It is only in the case of hard-core
> jet selection. So please include this in this sentence
>
> Upsilon RAA -> Upsilon R_{AA}
>
>
> Cheers
> Nihar
>
>
>
>
>
> On 2023-03-23 07:03, webmaster--- via Star-hp-l wrote:
>> Dear Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
>>
>> Veronica Verkest (vverkest AT gmail.com) has submitted a material for a
>> review,
>> please have a look:
>> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/63056
>>
>> Deadline: 2023-03-25
>> ---
>> If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
>> webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
>> _______________________________________________
>> Star-hp-l mailing list
>> Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
>> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l
> _______________________________________________
> Star-hp-l mailing list
> Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l
_______________________________________________
Star-hp-l mailing list
Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l