STAR HardProbes PWG

[Nihar Sahoo <nihar AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>]

Hello Youqi,

Thank you for your reply and addressing my comments.
I don't have any further comment.
I sign off.

Cheers
Nihar

On 2023-05-10 20:03, Youqi Song wrote:
> Hi Nihar,
>
> Thanks for the comments. I've uploaded a newer version on drupal.
> Please also find my response to your comments below.
>
> > L9-10: "Compared to the jets at the LHC, jets produced in … large
> > non-perturbative contributions." -> I understand what you want to
> > say
> > here. But we need to be careful while mentioning this type of
> > sentence.
> > It depends upon what kinematic range and what observables, etc. So
> > it is
> > naive to write this sentence. Please either be specific or rephrase
> > this
> > sentence.
>
> I've made this statement weaker to "Compared to the jets at the LHC,
> jets produced in $\sqrt{s} = 200$ GeV $pp$ collisions at STAR have
> lower transverse momenta and are therefore more susceptible to
> non-perturbative effects." I think it is in line with the statement
> "Jets in the transverse momentum range accessible at RHIC energies are
> more susceptible to non-perturbative effects such as hadronization
> effects by virtue of their lower momenta." from this STAR paper
> https://arxiv.org/pdf/2003.02114.pdf [1]
>
> > L17-19: "We continue our exploration of multi-dimensional jet
> > substructure observables, measuring a newly proposed observable, the
> > CollinearDrop groomed jet mass, while also utilizing a novel machine
> > learning method, MultiFold, to correct for detector effects." -> "We
> > measure a newly proposed multi-dimensional jet substructure
> > observable—the CollinearDrop groomed jet mass. A novel machine
> > learning
> > method, known as Multifold, is used to correct these observables for
> > the
> > detector effect."
>
>  I think it wouldn't hurt to have a sentence like "We continue our
> exploration of multi-dimensional jet substructure observables", since
> it connects what I have before the sentence about the previous
> multi-dimensional measurements at STAR, to what I am going to present.
> I also restructured this part a bit, since I realize that I need to
> describe collinear drop ("has an enhanced sensitivity to the soft
> radiation within jets") when I introduce it.
>
> Best,
> Youqi
>
> On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 9:09 AM Nihar Sahoo via Star-hp-l
> <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
>
> > Hello Youqi,
> >
> > Please find my comments on your nice abstract.
> >
> > L9-10: "Compared to the jets at the LHC, jets produced in … large
> > non-perturbative contributions." -> I understand what you want to
> > say
> > here. But we need to be careful while mentioning this type of
> > sentence.
> > It depends upon what kinematic range and what observables, etc. So
> > it is
> > naive to write this sentence. Please either be specific or rephrase
> > this
> > sentence.
> > L10-11: "The jet substructure measurements at STAR therefore offer
> > important complementary information to those at the LHC." -> "The
> > jet
> > substructure measurements in the STAR experiment, therefore, offer
> > important information about different regimes of quantum
> > chromodynamics
> > at RHIC energy."
> > L15: "…observables, including…" -> "    observables including "
> > L17-19: "We continue our exploration of multi-dimensional jet
> > substructure observables, measuring a newly proposed observable, the
> >
> > CollinearDrop groomed jet mass, while also utilizing a novel machine
> >
> > learning method, MultiFold, to correct for detector effects." -> "We
> >
> > measure a newly proposed multi-dimensional jet substructure
> > observable—the CollinearDrop groomed jet mass. A novel machine
> > learning
> > method, known as Multifold, is used to correct these observables for
> > the
> > detector effect."
> >
> > At the end, you may consider to add one sentence on what MC models
> > you
> > want to compare with the data to draw physics conclusion.
> >
> > Cheers
> > Nihar
> >
> > On 2023-05-09 23:38, webmaster--- via Star-hp-l wrote:
> > > Dear Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
> > >
> > > Youqi Song (youqi.song AT yale.edu) has submitted a material for a
> > review,
> > > please have a look:
> > > https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/63675
> > >
> > > Deadline: 2023-05-15
> > > ---
> > > If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
> > > webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Star-hp-l mailing list
> > > Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l
> > _______________________________________________
> > Star-hp-l mailing list
> > Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l
>
>
> Links:
> ------
> [1] 
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://arxiv.org/pdf/2003.02114.pdf__;!!P4SdNyxKAPE!FoST_p8axg5m3PuvXfWswUKMiZpv1EsGwh882uCBP7AYB1Ba43zKzqXVofS02pFiYtL-mw1RddB_OLE8ldYMH52Z7Q$