Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

star-hp-l - Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Dandan Shen for SPIN 2023 submitted for review

star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: STAR HardProbes PWG

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Nihar Sahoo <nihar AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>
  • To: "Mooney, Isaac" <isaac.mooney AT yale.edu>
  • Cc: STAR HardProbes PWG <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>, webmaster AT star.bnl.gov
  • Subject: Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Dandan Shen for SPIN 2023 submitted for review
  • Date: Tue, 30 May 2023 20:43:32 +0530

Hello Dandan,

I am going to send your abstract to startalk due to deadline, in the mean time please address Isaac's additional comment and also Yi's.

Cheers
Nihar

On 2023-05-29 21:18, Mooney, Isaac wrote:
Hi Dandan,

Thanks for addressing the comments. In the interest of time I sign
off, but see a few further comments below:

Sorry if I was unclear. I understand (or think I do) the reasoning for
using different frames and their physical meaning — my question was
whether that reasoning should be given in the abstract. But I think
it’s also fine not to go into it there, and save it for the
presentation.

8: “produced early in heavy-ion collisions”; “the full evolution
of the quark-gluon plasma (QGP) created in these collisions.”;
“Because of this, J/\psi serves…”;
9: “to study the properties of the QGP. In Ru+Ru…"
24: “and its physics implications will be discussed” is now an
orphan. You could do something like “…to the event plane. We
conclude by presenting the physics implications of this
measurement.”

Thanks,
Isaac

On May 29, 2023, at 2:52 AM, Dandan <shendandan AT mail.sdu.edu.cn>
wrote:

Hi Isaac and Nihar,

Thanks for your nice suggestions and comments.
I have implemented your comments in the updated version.
please find it at :

https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/SPIN2023Dandan_ver2.pdf


Here is answer of Issac's question
Question: _Would it be worth explaining why polarization with
respect to the event plane tells us something different than the HX
and CS frames? Something along the lines of it being connected more
directly to the QGP vorticity / initial EM fields than the other two
frames, if I understand correctly?_

Answer: Three frames differ in the x, y and z axis. The measurement
of the polarization with respect to the event plane connects more
directly to the QGP vorticity / initial EM fields as the direction
of the event plane reflects the direction of the angular momentum of
the colliding system. The z axis of the HX and CS frames is the
normal direction of the J/Psi production plane. Measuring of the
polarization in such frames can provide information about the J/Psi
production mechanism.
Best
Dandan

发件人:"Mooney, Isaac" <isaac.mooney AT yale.edu>
发送日期:2023-05-27 04:26:32
收件人:Dandan <shendandan AT mail.sdu.edu.cn>,STAR HardProbes PWG
<star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
抄送人:"webmaster AT star.bnl.gov" <webmaster AT star.bnl.gov>
主题:Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Dandan Shen for SPIN
2023 submitted for review
Hi Dandan,

The abstract reads nicely to me. I see that it’s roughly the same
as your Quark Matter abstract, so please forgive me for giving you
some small additional comments, since I’m new.

Thanks,
Isaac

2: “NN” should be upright (and in l. 9 and 21).

7: This sentence is a bit vague. I would explain why it's important.
Something like that the large scale set by the charm mass means the
heavy quark pairs are produced early and experience the full medium
evolution, interacting with it via dissociation/screening which
produce recognizable signatures of that interaction for study.
9: "GeV recorded by the STAR experiment" or similar.
10: "indicating the"
15: "the J/\psi and the QGP's"
18: Some more detail on your measurement would be nice. You probably
don't want to overpromise on the corrections and systematic
uncertainties, which I understand, but maybe e.g. the decay channel,
that it's differential in pT, etc. I don't want to make it overly
technical, but a couple of these high-level details shouldn't hurt.
20: Would it be worth explaining why polarization with respect to
the event plane tells us something different than the HX and CS
frames? Something along the lines of it being connected more
directly to the QGP vorticity / initial EM fields than the other two
frames, if I understand correctly?
20: "event plane"

On May 25, 2023, at 9:32 AM, Dandan via Star-hp-l
<star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:

Hi Isaac, Yi, and Nihar,

This is my abstract for SPIN2023.

Best,
Dandan

From: webmaster--- via Star-hp-l <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Date: 2023-05-24 16:35:34
To: Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Dandan Shen for SPIN 2023
submitted for review>Dear Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,

Dandan Shen (shendandan AT mail.sdu.edu.cn) has submitted a material
for a
review, please have a look:
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/63776

Deadline: 2023-05-31
---
If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
_______________________________________________
Star-hp-l mailing list
Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l

_______________________________________________
Star-hp-l mailing list
Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page