star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: STAR HardProbes PWG
List archive
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by David Stewart for IS 2023 submitted for review
- From: Nihar Sahoo <nihar AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>
- To: David Stewart <0ds.johnny AT gmail.com>
- Cc: STAR HardProbes PWG <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
- Subject: Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by David Stewart for IS 2023 submitted for review
- Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2023 11:37:03 +0530
Hello Dave,
Thank you for implementing my comments.
Please correct on slide15:
_ (3) (3) jet in BBC
But I am not sure what is the meaning of "jet in BBC"? We are not measuring jet using BBC here. right?
With this clarification, I sign off.
I have no more comments.
Cheers
Nihar
On 2023-06-09 23:31, David Stewart wrote:
Hi Nihar,
Thanks for your careful reading and feedback. I have updated my slides
to version 1 in the system at this page [1] (which points to this pdf
[2]). Please see my comments and edits responding to your comments
in-line below,
Best regards,
Dave
On Fri, Jun 9, 2023 at 2:26β―AM Nihar Sahoo via Star-hp-l
<star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
Hello Dave,
Please find my comments on your nice presentation slides.
SLide-3:
_ '&' -> 'and' all places
done
_"Experimentally observe initial parton distribution: " -> Sounds
awkward, if you refer to Slide 7and 8, then I would prefer "Measure
quark and gluon fraction initiated jet"
edited
_Measure parton shower increasingly differentially -> Not clear
what do
you want to say?
edited
SLide-4:
_Experimental data: particles in STAR -> "STAR detector" [as you
have
not discussed any data and run except detector]
? not sure why, but done
_TPC particles -> Charged particles from TPC
_TPC + BEMC particles -> Charged particle from TPC and neutral
particles
from BEMC
Not changed for now; I think this is more words without any extra
meaning because the type of particles are already stated in TPC and
BEMC bullets above.
SLide-5:
_Field theory predicts observable -> Give reference.
arXiv:2205.03414 ,
2209.11236β¨_"Observe/measure Ξ_QCD" -> Do you mean we can measure
"Ξ_QCD" using EEC? Make it clear.
_ @ -> "At" or "For"
done
SLide-6:
_ Title: First corrected EEC measurement -> I recall these are not
"corrected". Can you please confirm it?
done
_ GeV/c vs GeV/ italic{c} -> make it consistent at all places
done
SLide-8:
_Can you please remind me where do you get this preliminary plot?
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/blog/gmcnam/Preliminary-Request-Jet-Charge-DNP-2022
_(data is moving to the right -> more quark dominated) ->it is not
apparent. Can you point to me this preliminary results or previous
presentation slides?
same link as above -- but you can see it i
Slide-9:
_ I like right side jet cartoon. But it is quite unusual to have
that
many particles in pp jet even if it is a cartoon. Can you please
make
that with less number of arrows.
I'll put it on my list to remake a new more pp-like
_ Make the equation size bigger so that visible to audience
done
_hot nuclear effects -> hot-dense QCD matter effect
done
_"Same results from measurement of jet girth" -> Better to be silent
as
you are not showing any results here. Opt to drop it.
I have the figure in the backup, it was just cut for time. Is there a
graceful way to advertise that this is also being measured?
Slide-13:
jets from -> jet yield from
done
SLide-14 and 13:
Introduce "EA"
done on slide 13
Slide15
_ RAA -> R_AA
done
_ At RHIC kinematics -> Or "At STAR kinematics"
done
_ (3) jet in BBC -> Do you mean "activity in BBC"? Not sure what is
"jet in BBC"?
done
_ No "auto-correlation" from jets in EA acceptance -> Can you please
explain what do you mean here "auto-correlation"?
edited
Slide-16:
_ mid-pT and lower-pT -> mid-p_{T}^{reco} and lower-p_{T}^{reco} _"
Anti-correlation: EA distribution in high-πT jet events
significantly
softer than EA distribution in mid-πT and lower-πT jet events"
-> here
this sentence is confusing. It is because of "high-πT jet
events" and
"mid-πT and lower-πT jet events"; Can you please clarify it?
revised
_And what is this <BBCE sum > for each pT^reco bins? Not clear.
label is edited
_In side plot, 10< p_{Tiled}^{reco} < 15 -> 10< p_{Tiled}^{reco} <
15
GeV/c; same for other two
done
SLide-17:
_"Qualitatively different from quenching in QGP in A+A collisions"
->
Can you please expound what is the qualitative difference here
between
A+A and p+A?
really good catch -- I have reorganized the bullets to indicate the
logic
Slide-20:
_ "Correlation results not from final state effects, but rather
βnewβ
physics present in initial configuration of the ions, or the initial
stages of the collision" -> Not clear where do you get this
conclusion?
Can you please point to me which results you refer here?
wording is edited
I suggest to improve your summary slides 20-21. In the current form,
it
is a bit unorganized way summarizing your beautiful results and
number
of topics you covered in this presentation. Can you please give a
try to
improve it so that audience can get takeaway message ?
are much edited
Cheers
Nihar
On 2023-06-07 01:17, webmaster--- via Star-hp-l wrote:
Dear Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,for a
David Stewart (david.j.stewart AT yale.edu) has submitted a material
review, please have a look:_______________________________________________
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/63898
Deadline: 2023-06-19
---
If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
_______________________________________________
Star-hp-l mailing list
Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l
Star-hp-l mailing list
Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l
--
David Stewart
Postdoctoral Fellow | Department of Physics, Wayne State University
Links:
------
[1] https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/presentations/2023/Measurements-jet-substructure-pp-and-jet-event-activity-correlations-pAu-collis-0
[2] https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/StarHP_IS2023_v1.pdf
-
[Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by David Stewart for IS 2023 submitted for review
, (continued)
-
[Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by David Stewart for IS 2023 submitted for review,
webmaster, 06/06/2023
- Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by David Stewart for IS 2023 submitted for review, Mooney, Isaac, 06/06/2023
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by David Stewart for IS 2023 submitted for review,
Nihar Sahoo, 06/09/2023
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by David Stewart for IS 2023 submitted for review,
David Stewart, 06/09/2023
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by David Stewart for IS 2023 submitted for review,
Mooney, Isaac, 06/10/2023
-
Message not available
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by David Stewart for IS 2023 submitted for review,
Mooney, Isaac, 06/12/2023
- Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by David Stewart for IS 2023 submitted for review, David Stewart, 06/12/2023
- Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by David Stewart for IS 2023 submitted for review, David Stewart, 06/13/2023
- Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by David Stewart for IS 2023 submitted for review, Barbara Trzeciak, 06/14/2023
- Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by David Stewart for IS 2023 submitted for review, Helen Caines, 06/14/2023
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by David Stewart for IS 2023 submitted for review,
Mooney, Isaac, 06/12/2023
-
Message not available
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by David Stewart for IS 2023 submitted for review,
Mooney, Isaac, 06/10/2023
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by David Stewart for IS 2023 submitted for review,
David Stewart, 06/09/2023
-
[Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by David Stewart for IS 2023 submitted for review,
webmaster, 06/06/2023
- Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by David Stewart for IS 2023 submitted for review, Nihar Sahoo, 06/12/2023
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.