Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

star-hp-l - Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Nihar Sahoo for Hard Probes 2023 submitted for review

star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: STAR HardProbes PWG

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Yi Yang <yiyang0429 AT gmail.com>
  • To: STAR HardProbes PWG <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
  • Cc: webmaster AT star.bnl.gov
  • Subject: Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Nihar Sahoo for Hard Probes 2023 submitted for review
  • Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2023 14:46:15 +0800

Hi Nihar,

Thanks a lot for the nice proceedings. I have some comments for your consideration. 
 - Abstract: you are not only mentioning the results from heavy-ion collisions, so it is a bit weird to state "including jets and heavy flavour pro- duction in heavy-ion collisions to study the properties of the quark-gluon plasma.". It should include p+p... 

 - L10 - L13: I don't think investigating QGP is the "only" goal for RHIC, but this sentence reads this way... It would be good to merge L29 - 33 here. 
 (Title 3.1 is "Probing fundamental QCD", so it would be good to add this feature here.)
 - L25: in both heavy-ion collisions and 𝑝+𝑝 collisions. -->  in both heavy-ion and 𝑝+𝑝 collisions.
 - L68: missing a period at the end. 
 - L79: in [5] --> in Ref. [5]. 
 - Figure 1 caption: add p+p collisions at 200 GeV. 
 - L85: add a reference for "can be utilized to map the Lund Plan of parton shower."
 - L88: in [7] --> in Ref. [7]. 
 - L88: both these techniques --> both techniques? 
 - L97: in [8] --> in Ref. [8]. 
 - L102: in [9] --> in Ref. [9]. 
 - L116: add 200 GeV somewhere
 - L127: in [12] --> in Ref. [12]. 
 - Figure 5 caption: add Au+Au at 200 GeV
 - L139: in [14] --> in Ref. [14]. 
 - Figure 6 caption: add p+p and Au+Au at 200 GeV
 - L144: Isobar --> isobar 
 - L151: in [15] --> in Ref. [15]. 
 - L153: Isobar --> isobar 
 - Figure 7 caption: add 200 GeV
 - L156: You clearly talked about both J/psi and Upsilon, so this sentence is a bit strange. You also mainly talked about the results in isobar collisions, so mentioning Au+Au is strange... I would move this sentence or rephrase it.  
 - L158: Isobar --> isobar 
 - L164: Isobar --> isobar 
 - L167: in [16] --> in Ref. [16]
 - Figure 8 caption: add 200 GeV for isobar and Au+Au at 200 GeV for Upsilon. 
 - L200: "zero J/psi v2" is not good, should be something "not significant J/psi v2". 
 - L201: the conclusion doesn't mention Upsilon suppression. 
 

Cheers,
Yi




On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 2:10 PM webmaster--- via Star-hp-l <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
Dear Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,

Nihar Sahoo (nihar AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov) has submitted a material for a review, 
please have a look:
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/64418

---
If you have any problems with the review process, please contact 
webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
_______________________________________________
Star-hp-l mailing list
Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page