STAR HardProbes PWG

[Nihar Sahoo <nihar AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>]

Hello Yi,

Thank you for your comments.
I have implemented in proceedings version-2.
And my reply to some of your comments can be found inline.

Regards
Nihar

On 2023-08-03 12:16, Yi Yang via Star-hp-l wrote:
> Hi Nihar,
>
> Thanks a lot for the nice proceedings. I have some comments for your
> consideration.
>  - Abstract: you are not only mentioning the results from heavy-ion
> collisions, so it is a bit weird to state "including jets and heavy
> flavour pro- duction in heavy-ion collisions to study the properties
> of the quark-gluon plasma.". It should include p+p...
I have included "...jet-substructure observables in proton-proton 
collisions ...".
>  - L10 - L13: I don't think investigating QGP is the "only" goal for
> RHIC, but this sentence reads this way... It would be good to merge
> L29 - 33 here.
>  (Title 3.1 is "Probing fundamental QCD", so it would be good to add
> this feature here.)

I rephrased a bit to accommodate your suggestions.
For example L10: "...primarily aims ..."
L14: "...and QCD in vacuum at RHIC."

>  - L25: in both heavy-ion collisions and 𝑝+𝑝 collisions. -->  in
> both heavy-ion and 𝑝+𝑝 collisions.
>  - L68: missing a period at the end.
>  - L79: in [5] --> in Ref. [5].
>  - Figure 1 caption: add p+p collisions at 200 GeV.
>  - L85: add a reference for "can be utilized to map the Lund Plan of
> parton shower."
>  - L88: in [7] --> in Ref. [7].
>  - L88: both these techniques --> both techniques?
>  - L97: in [8] --> in Ref. [8].
>  - L102: in [9] --> in Ref. [9].
>  - L116: add 200 GeV somewhere
>  - L127: in [12] --> in Ref. [12].
>  - Figure 5 caption: add Au+Au at 200 GeV
>  - L139: in [14] --> in Ref. [14].
>  - Figure 6 caption: add p+p and Au+Au at 200 GeV
>  - L144: Isobar --> isobar
>  - L151: in [15] --> in Ref. [15].
>
>  - L153: Isobar --> isobar  - Figure 7 caption: add 200 GeV
All done.
>  - L156: You clearly talked about both J/psi and Upsilon, so this
> sentence is a bit strange. You also mainly talked about the results in
> isobar collisions, so mentioning Au+Au is strange... I would move this
> sentence or rephrase it.
I rephrased it.
"...the 𝐽/𝜓 measurements in different collision systems and suppression 
of different Υ states in Au+Au collisions are discussed in this 
section."

>  - L158: Isobar --> isobar
>  - L164: Isobar --> isobar
>  - L167: in [16] --> in Ref. [16]
>  - Figure 8 caption: add 200 GeV for isobar and Au+Au at 200 GeV for
> Upsilon.
>  - L200: "zero J/psi v2" is not good, should be something "not
> significant J/psi v2".
I rephrased.
>  - L201: the conclusion doesn't mention Upsilon suppression.
Now I included.

> Cheers,
> Yi
>
> On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 2:10 PM webmaster--- via Star-hp-l
> <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
>
> > Dear Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
> >
> > Nihar Sahoo (nihar AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov) has submitted a material for a
> > review,
> > please have a look:
> > https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/64418
> >
> > ---
> > If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
> > webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
> > _______________________________________________
> > Star-hp-l mailing list
> > Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l
> _______________________________________________
> Star-hp-l mailing list
> Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l