STAR HardProbes PWG

[Diptanil Roy <roydiptanil AT gmail.com>]

Hi Yuan, I have a small comment about the diagram that you use in your slides 2 and 5. I have also attached it below.

D0 is c+ubar, please correct that.

On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 5:16 PM suyuann--- via Star-hp-l <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:

Dear Nihar,
 Thank you for your nice comments. I’ve implemented all of them, please find the updated version here:
 https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/QM_2023_0829.pdf

Best regards,
Yuan

> -----Original Messages-----
> From: "Nihar Sahoo via Star-hp-l" <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
> Sent Time: 2023-08-28 15:51:54 (Monday)
> To: "STAR HardProbes PWG" <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
> Cc: "Nihar Sahoo" <nihar AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>, webmaster AT star.bnl.gov
> Subject: Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Yuan Su for Quark Matter 2023 submitted for review
>
> Dear Yuan,
>
> Thank you for posting your nice slides.
> I have following comments on your slides.
>
> No need to make text as red color for your interest.
>
> Slide 3:
> _ "A significant energy loss of charm quarks in isobar collisions?" ->
> sounds like you have already know the conclusion.
>
>     How about combing last two bullets
> "What is the charge quark energy loss and binary collision scaling in
> Isobar collisions?"
>
> Slide4:
>
> _ Title: Charm jets tagged with D^0 mesons -> Simply  " D^0 tagged jet
> in heavy-ion collisions"
>
> _ Definition of Z; please check with what Diptanil has used in his
> poster. Use the same notations.
>
> _ "A significant suppression of D0 tagged jet yield with lower D0
> kinematics at RHIC energies? " -> Remove this bullet. Not needed to say
> anything.
>
> _ Make "radial distribution of the D^0" _expression_ a bit bigger and move
> it up so that people can see from distance.
>
> Slide5:
> "A diffusion of charm quarks at lower pT in Au+Au collisions at sNN =
> 200 GeV?" -> It is not clear where do you get it. I think it is not
> needed. Just go to your results in 15min talk. In QM, people want to see
> the results assuming they are aware of motivation.
>
> _"Contribution from the underlying background is small at RHIC" This is
> not absolutely correct. And not clear what underlying background you are
> talking. So better to remove or rephrase this.
>
> _In this slide important is to highlight the kienematic range of D^0
> that you are going to show: 1 - 10 GeV/c; That you mentioned at the
> bottom that no one will notice. Make it bigger and highlight somewhere
> up.
>
> Slide7:
> combination background -> combinatoric background
>
>
> Slide8:
> _Suggestion: Less wording is better. Try to clean it up and make a
> concise phrase or sentence
> _ VS -> vs [and elsewhere]
>
>
> You can bring slide4 and 5 before Slide12, so that you can tell people
> what you are going to tell next.
> Make 1-10 GeV/c kinematic slide in bold text on each slides.
>
> Slide12:
> I hope you will speak a sentence on "LIDO" comparison .
>
> Cheers
> Nihar
>
>
> On 2023-08-28 10:53, webmaster--- via Star-hp-l wrote:
> > Dear Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
> >
> > Yuan Su (suyuann AT mail.ustc.edu.cn) has submitted a material for a
> > review,
> > please have a look:
> > https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/64968
> >
> > Deadline: 2023-09-03
> > ---
> > If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
> > webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
> > _______________________________________________
> > Star-hp-l mailing list
> > Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l
> _______________________________________________
> Star-hp-l mailing list
> Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l
_______________________________________________
Star-hp-l mailing list
Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l

--

~ Neil