Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

star-hp-l - Re: [Star-hp-l] O+O Jet v2 Preliminary Request

star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: STAR HardProbes PWG

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Mooney, Isaac" <isaac.mooney AT yale.edu>
  • To: STAR HardProbes PWG <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
  • Cc: Yi Yang <yiyang0429 AT gmail.com>, Tristan Protzman <tlp220 AT lehigh.edu>
  • Subject: Re: [Star-hp-l] O+O Jet v2 Preliminary Request
  • Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2023 00:57:40 +0000

Hi Tristan,

This is fine with me for the moment.

Thanks,
Isaac

On Aug 31, 2023, at 6:31 PM, Tristan Protzman via Star-hp-l <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:

Hi All,

Given the discussion of the result I'm seeing possibly having a sizable contribution from non-flow effects, I have been asked to update the preliminary figure to reflect this.  I propose calling the measurement v_{2}^{unsubtracted}, as v_{2}^{obs] is already used to describe the v2 obtained before correcting for the event plane resolution.  I have updated the figures and preliminary figure request to reflect this. 

Please let me know if this is acceptable, or if there is other labeling you would prefer I use.

Cheers,
Tristan 

On Aug 30, 2023, at 10:47, Yi Yang <yiyang0429 AT gmail.com> wrote:

Hi Tristan,

Thanks a lot for the preliminary requests. I have some minor comments for your consideration. 
- p9: I would add "average background density" in front of pho is 0. 
- I think we agreed (from the discussion between Rongrong and Rosi) that we will use v2^obs instead of v2 in the result. Could you please change it and update the plots on your poster? 

Cheers,
Yi


On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 11:22 PM Tristan Protzman via Star-hp-l <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
Hi All,

I have realized the slides I presented at last Thursday's meeting for the preliminary figure request were never distributed properly.  They can be found here:

https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url="https%3A%2F%2Fdrupal.star.bnl.gov%2FSTAR%2Fsystem%2Ffiles%2Fpreliminary_figure_request_OO_v2.pdf&data=05%7C01%7Cisaac.mooney%40yale.edu%7Ce4e25f48982a4bdd2ee708dbaa7a7949%7Cdd8cbebb21394df8b4114e3e87abeb5c%7C0%7C0%7C638291215506544703%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=x%2BEJXAiDPi2Y7zlhXBLmyEFku1GXFoFMq21ZVVwuDhw%3D&reserved=0

I have added a slide showing a comparison to a quick check I added at low pt track v2 compared to results by Shengli Huang who has done a more detailed study of flow measurements in O+O.  I believe the comparison shows reasonable agreement between the results, averaging between the 20-40% and 40-60% bins they show.  

Cheers,
Tristan 
_______________________________________________
Star-hp-l mailing list
Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url="https%3A%2F%2Flists.bnl.gov%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fstar-hp-l&data=05%7C01%7Cisaac.mooney%40yale.edu%7Ce4e25f48982a4bdd2ee708dbaa7a7949%7Cdd8cbebb21394df8b4114e3e87abeb5c%7C0%7C0%7C638291215506544703%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=e6qIy5c7hM%2BjQYZHP4UzYa4lfn1eibE%2BGLAH4L7wxfE%3D&reserved=0

_______________________________________________
Star-hp-l mailing list
Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url="https%3A%2F%2Flists.bnl.gov%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fstar-hp-l&data=05%7C01%7Cisaac.mooney%40yale.edu%7Ce4e25f48982a4bdd2ee708dbaa7a7949%7Cdd8cbebb21394df8b4114e3e87abeb5c%7C0%7C0%7C638291215506544703%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=e6qIy5c7hM%2BjQYZHP4UzYa4lfn1eibE%2BGLAH4L7wxfE%3D&reserved=0




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page