STAR HardProbes PWG

[tc88qy <tc88qy AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>]

Hello Convenors,

It has been 10 days since I submit the abstract. Can you send out your 
comments? So we can move forward.

Qian Yang

On 2023-09-28 21:22, tc88qy via Star-hp-l wrote:
> Hello Nihar,
>
> Thanks for your sign-off. It has been updated.
>
> Qian Yang
> On 2023-09-28 17:42, Nihar Sahoo wrote:
> > Hello Qian,
> >
> > Please rephrase that sentence as,
> >
> > L14: Moreover, it has been predicted that J/ψ spin can be aligned by
> > the spin-orbit coupling of J/ψ and QGP’s large angular momentum in
> > non-central heavy-ion collisions.
> > -> "Moreover, it has been predicted that J/ψ spin could align in the
> > direction of large angular momentum produced in non-central heavy-ion
> > collisions due to the spin-orbit coupling of J/psi. "
> >
> > With this implemented, I sign off.
> >
> > Best
> > Nihar
> >
> >
> > On 2023-09-28 11:56, tc88qy wrote:
> > > Hello Nihar，
> > >
> > >  I do not have strong reason for that. And I corrected it in the same 
> > > link.
> > > Please look at it .
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Qian Yang
> > >
> > > On 2023-09-28 14:19, Nihar Sahoo wrote:
> > > > Hello Qian,
> > > >
> > > > Thank you for implementing some of my comments.
> > > >
> > > > I have a follow up comment that I find you have not addressed.
> > > >
> > > > > > _ J/ψ can be polarized by… -> in the spin alignment context better 
> > > > > > to
> > > > > > say "J/ψ spin aligns in the direction of global angular momentum 
> > > > > > due
> > > > > > to spin-orbital coupling"
> > > > > > Better avoid mixing "J/psi polarization" and "J/psi spin 
> > > > > > alignment" in the text.
> > > >
> > > > I find you keep the same "J/ψ can be polarized by the spin-orbit
> > > > coupling " (L14).
> > > > My suggestion was not to mix "polarized" in the context of "the
> > > > spin-orbit coupling"; they are two physics topics and we need to 
> > > > make
> > > > sure they should not be mixed in the text.
> > > > Better to use "aligned" like spin is aligned.
> > > >
> > > > Let me know if you have a strong reason for it.
> > > >
> > > > Best
> > > > Nihar
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 2023-09-28 10:57, tc88qy wrote:
> > > > > Hello Nihar,
> > > > >   Thanks for your carefully reading and suggestions.
> > > > >  I keep "Ru +Ru and Zr+Zr" in the title. It would be more friendly 
> > > > > to
> > > > > those people not from STAR experiment to know the collision system
> > > > > directly.
> > > > >  Other than that I have implemented all your suggestions in the new
> > > > > version (v2).
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks
> > > > > Qian Yang
> > > > >
> > > > > On 2023-09-27 14:42, Nihar Sahoo via Star-hp-l wrote:
> > > > > > Hello Qian,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Please find my comments on your abstract.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Title: You can shorten a bit.
> > > > > > "Measurements of J/ψ polarization and global spin alignment in 
> > > > > > Ru+Ru
> > > > > > and Zr+Zr collisions at √sNN = 200 GeV from STAR experiment" ->
> > > > > > "Measurements of J/ψ polarization and global spin alignment in 
> > > > > > isobar
> > > > > > collisions at √sNN = 200 GeV by STAR"
> > > > > >
> > > > > > "J/psi" has been used many instances in this abstract. Please 
> > > > > > avoid.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > L9: "…suppression of J/ψ and zero J/ψ v2 …" -> suppression of J/ψ 
> > > > > > and
> > > > > > its zero second order flow coefficient ...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > L12: "Beside J/ψ nulcear modification factor and J/ψ azimuthal
> > > > > > anisotropy observable, the J/ψ polarization…" -> "Besides, the J/ψ
> > > > > > polarization could provide additional information about the QGP
> > > > > > properties and its production mechanism in heavy-ion collisions.
> > > > > >  [No need to repeat again, already mentioned in previous sentence; 
> > > > > > and
> > > > > > "a new degree of study" doesn't sound good]
> > > > > >
> > > > > > L14-18: "it has been hypothesized…in early stage. -> This entire
> > > > > > sentence sounds complicated. Can you please split it?
> > > > > > Suggestion:
> > > > > > _ hypothesized -> predicted
> > > > > > _ J/ψ can be polarized by… -> in the spin alignment context better 
> > > > > > to
> > > > > > say "J/ψ spin aligns in the direction of global angular momentum 
> > > > > > due
> > > > > > to spin-orbital coupling"
> > > > > > Better avoid mixing "J/psi polarization" and "J/psi spin 
> > > > > > alignment" in the text.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > L22: will be present -> are reported
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Best
> > > > > > Nihar
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 2023-09-27 09:01, webmaster--- via Star-hp-l wrote:
> > > > > > > Dear Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Qian Yang (tc88qy AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov) has submitted a material for 
> > > > > > > a review,
> > > > > > > please have a look:
> > > > > > > https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/65290
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Deadline: 2023-10-10
> > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > > If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
> > > > > > > webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
> > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > Star-hp-l mailing list
> > > > > > > Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > > > > > > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l
> > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > Star-hp-l mailing list
> > > > > > Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > > > > > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l
> _______________________________________________
> Star-hp-l mailing list
> Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l