star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: STAR HardProbes PWG
List archive
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Priyanka Roy Chowdhury for WPCF 2023 submitted for review
- From: "Roy Chowdhury Priyanka (DOKT)" <priyanka.roy_chowdhury.dokt AT pw.edu.pl>
- To: Nihar Sahoo <nihar AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>, STAR HardProbes PWG <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
- Cc: "webmaster AT star.bnl.gov" <webmaster AT star.bnl.gov>
- Subject: Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Priyanka Roy Chowdhury for WPCF 2023 submitted for review
- Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2023 11:32:00 +0000
Hi Nihar,
Thanks a lot for your thoughtful comments and suggestions. Apologize for my delay in
responding. I have gone through the reference papers a couple of times and modified the slides (4, 5) in order to address your questions. Please find my updated slides here
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/WPCF_Priyanka_V5.pdf.
Also, please find my answers below.
-
"It
seems the left pi-D plot shows no correlation. Is not
it? Unlike p-D. Make a point here if that is correct" -> You are correct, for both plots, the level of correlation signal is very poor. The main message from the two observations is that the estimated value of FSI parameters suggests chances of D meson re-scattering in the hadronic phase are very low. -
"Resonance effect fade out…" -> Where do you get this statement?Please explain or provide a reference. --> I have added a brief explanation but the main takeover from this slide (5) are bullet no. 2 and 4
-
"If you want to discuss sys. Uncertainty here, then mention also %sysuncertainty for case-1" ---> My plan is to mention that slide 11 refers to the D0 signal purity
-
"STAR data shows no correlations, but the data is also consistent with
theoretical models…" -> It sounds self-contradictory. I would
prefer to say "Due to large uncertainty, STAR data inconclusive to pin
down the source size" ------> I couldn't find any better way to rephrase the statement and I have kept it the same as it was on the QM poster. -
The last bullet on the summary slides mentions the future plan because in the abstract we mention D0-charged hadron femtoscopy and now I have changed it to only D0-K, so maybe there would be a question about other hadrons
Regards,
Priyanka
From: Nihar Sahoo <nihar AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>
Sent: Wednesday, November 1, 2023 4:23 AM
To: STAR HardProbes PWG <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Cc: Roy Chowdhury Priyanka (DOKT) <priyanka.roy_chowdhury.dokt AT pw.edu.pl>; webmaster AT star.bnl.gov <webmaster AT star.bnl.gov>
Subject: Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Priyanka Roy Chowdhury for WPCF 2023 submitted for review
Sent: Wednesday, November 1, 2023 4:23 AM
To: STAR HardProbes PWG <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Cc: Roy Chowdhury Priyanka (DOKT) <priyanka.roy_chowdhury.dokt AT pw.edu.pl>; webmaster AT star.bnl.gov <webmaster AT star.bnl.gov>
Subject: Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Priyanka Roy Chowdhury for WPCF 2023 submitted for review
Hello Priyanka,
Please find my comments on your nice presentation slides below.
Slide4:
_"Figure 2: Correlation between unlike…at ALICE" -> Remove it.
_ Can you please mention individually what physics we observed from both
these two figures? It seems left pi-D plot shows no correlation. Is not
it? Unlike p-D. Make a point here if that is correct.
Slide5:
_ "Figure 3: …" ->Remove this [Generally in presentation we do not use
this]
_ Don't use "Fig 3 (a)" "(a)" or (b)" ; better mention what
correlation you point to
_ "Resonance effect fade out…" -> where do you get this statement?
Please explain or provide reference.
Slide6,7,8
_"Figure 5?: …" ->Remove it
Slide16:
If you want to discuss sys. Uncertainty here, then mention also %sys
uncertainty for case-1
Slide17:
_"STAR data shows no correlations, but the data also consistent with
theoretical models…" -> It sounds like self contradictory. I would
prefer to say "Due to large uncertainty, STAR data inconclusive to pin
down the source size"
Or similar.
_Late bullet -> not sure if we need it here.
Best
Nihar
On 2023-10-31 04:01, Roy Chowdhury Priyanka (DOKT) via Star-hp-l wrote:
> Dear convenors,
>
> I am not sure if my previous email was received, therefore, to avoid
> confusion, I am sharing the link of my updated version of the slides
> here once again.
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/WPCF_Priyanka_V3.pdf
> I made the changes after a discussion with local STAR group at WUT and
> I have removed previous version.
>
> Regards,
> Priyanka
>
> -------------------------
>
> From: Star-hp-l <star-hp-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov> on behalf of
> webmaster--- via Star-hp-l <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
> Sent: Saturday, October 28, 2023 1:36 PM
> To: Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov <Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
> Cc: webmaster AT star.bnl.gov <webmaster AT star.bnl.gov>
> Subject: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Priyanka Roy Chowdhury for
> WPCF 2023 submitted for review
>
> Dear Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
>
> Priyanka Roy Chowdhury (priyanka.roy_chowdhury.dokt AT pw.edu.pl) has
> submitted
> a material for a review, please have a look:
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/65747
>
> Deadline: 2023-11-06
> ---
> If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
> webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
> _______________________________________________
> Star-hp-l mailing list
> Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l
> _______________________________________________
> Star-hp-l mailing list
> Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l
Please find my comments on your nice presentation slides below.
Slide4:
_"Figure 2: Correlation between unlike…at ALICE" -> Remove it.
_ Can you please mention individually what physics we observed from both
these two figures? It seems left pi-D plot shows no correlation. Is not
it? Unlike p-D. Make a point here if that is correct.
Slide5:
_ "Figure 3: …" ->Remove this [Generally in presentation we do not use
this]
_ Don't use "Fig 3 (a)" "(a)" or (b)" ; better mention what
correlation you point to
_ "Resonance effect fade out…" -> where do you get this statement?
Please explain or provide reference.
Slide6,7,8
_"Figure 5?: …" ->Remove it
Slide16:
If you want to discuss sys. Uncertainty here, then mention also %sys
uncertainty for case-1
Slide17:
_"STAR data shows no correlations, but the data also consistent with
theoretical models…" -> It sounds like self contradictory. I would
prefer to say "Due to large uncertainty, STAR data inconclusive to pin
down the source size"
Or similar.
_Late bullet -> not sure if we need it here.
Best
Nihar
On 2023-10-31 04:01, Roy Chowdhury Priyanka (DOKT) via Star-hp-l wrote:
> Dear convenors,
>
> I am not sure if my previous email was received, therefore, to avoid
> confusion, I am sharing the link of my updated version of the slides
> here once again.
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/WPCF_Priyanka_V3.pdf
> I made the changes after a discussion with local STAR group at WUT and
> I have removed previous version.
>
> Regards,
> Priyanka
>
> -------------------------
>
> From: Star-hp-l <star-hp-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov> on behalf of
> webmaster--- via Star-hp-l <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
> Sent: Saturday, October 28, 2023 1:36 PM
> To: Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov <Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
> Cc: webmaster AT star.bnl.gov <webmaster AT star.bnl.gov>
> Subject: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Priyanka Roy Chowdhury for
> WPCF 2023 submitted for review
>
> Dear Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
>
> Priyanka Roy Chowdhury (priyanka.roy_chowdhury.dokt AT pw.edu.pl) has
> submitted
> a material for a review, please have a look:
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/65747
>
> Deadline: 2023-11-06
> ---
> If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
> webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
> _______________________________________________
> Star-hp-l mailing list
> Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l
> _______________________________________________
> Star-hp-l mailing list
> Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Priyanka Roy Chowdhury for WPCF 2023 submitted for review,
Roy Chowdhury Priyanka (DOKT), 11/03/2023
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Priyanka Roy Chowdhury for WPCF 2023 submitted for review,
Nihar Sahoo, 11/03/2023
- Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Priyanka Roy Chowdhury for WPCF 2023 submitted for review, Roy Chowdhury Priyanka (DOKT), 11/03/2023
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Priyanka Roy Chowdhury for WPCF 2023 submitted for review,
Roy Chowdhury Priyanka (DOKT), 11/03/2023
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Priyanka Roy Chowdhury for WPCF 2023 submitted for review,
Mooney, Isaac, 11/04/2023
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Priyanka Roy Chowdhury for WPCF 2023 submitted for review,
Roy Chowdhury Priyanka (DOKT), 11/04/2023
- Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Priyanka Roy Chowdhury for WPCF 2023 submitted for review, Mooney, Isaac, 11/04/2023
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Priyanka Roy Chowdhury for WPCF 2023 submitted for review,
Roy Chowdhury Priyanka (DOKT), 11/04/2023
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Priyanka Roy Chowdhury for WPCF 2023 submitted for review,
Mooney, Isaac, 11/04/2023
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Priyanka Roy Chowdhury for WPCF 2023 submitted for review,
Nihar Sahoo, 11/03/2023
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.