STAR HardProbes PWG

[Nihar Sahoo <nihar AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>]

Thank you, Isaac.

Best
Nihar


On 2024-02-25 06:53, Mooney, Isaac wrote:
> Hi Nihar,
>
> Sorry for my delay, but for the record the slides look really nice to
> me and I have no further comments.
>
> Thanks,
> Isaac
>
> > On Feb 23, 2024, at 5:15 AM, Nihar Sahoo via Star-hp-l
> > <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
> > Thank you, Barbara. I have edited that in v3.
> https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdrupal.star.bnl.gov%2FSTAR%2Fpresentations%2FQWG-2024%2FRecent-heavy-flavor-results-heavy-ion-collisions-STAR&data=05%7C02%7Cisaac.mooney%40yale.edu%7C07082711566c4236701908dc34585499%7Cdd8cbebb21394df8b4114e3e87abeb5c%7C0%7C0%7C638442801192545801%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=m4BNbxD3Ah2JtRaukVoUNnTMOg9eA7p2F3sCkbBZudM%3D&reserved=0
> > [1]
> >
> > Best
> > Nihar
> >
> > On 2024-02-23 15:33, Barbara Trzeciak wrote:
> > Sounds good now, yes, that was the confusion.
> > Cheers,
> > Barbara
> > On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 10:59 AM Nihar Sahoo
> > <nihar AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov> wrote:
> > Hello Barbara,
> > Yes, that is correct way to say and that is what I mean.
> > I think "p+Au vs. Au+Au" makes the confusion. I will remove that
> > sentence, instead use the following,
> > "pAu data help to quantify the CNM effect in AuAu collisions."
> > Let me know what do you think.
> > Best
> > Nihar
> > On 2024-02-23 15:10, Barbara Trzeciak wrote:
> > Hi Nihar,
> > I think the theory CNM models compare to pA data, so what we need
> > are
> > precise data in these small systems.
> > Then the CNM effects can be factorized (at least most of them at
> > mid-rapidity) to quantify the CNM effects in AA collisions, and
> > distatagle in this way the hot medium effects.
> > Cheers,
> > Barbara
> > On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 10:33 AM Nihar Sahoo
> > <nihar AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov> wrote:
> > Hello Barbara,
> > What I mean here that to have better model of the CNM effects,
> > Theorist
> > need a comparison between pAu and Au+Au collisions.
> > Please see summary of our STAR paper
> https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fpdf%2F2110.09666.pdf&data=05%7C02%7Cisaac.mooney%40yale.edu%7C07082711566c4236701908dc34585499%7Cdd8cbebb21394df8b4114e3e87abeb5c%7C0%7C0%7C638442801192554788%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=JEyui8gXH%2F3nawVfHbTkebBTwLTQfPfotAVeHrBrDnw%3D&reserved=0
> > [2] [1] [1]
> > "... to quantify the CNM effects experienced by the J/ψ meson in
> > p+Au
> > collisions."
> > Best
> > Nihar
> > On 2024-02-23 13:44, Barbara Trzeciak wrote:
> > Hi Nihar,
> > thanks, I have one more question:
> > - s7: "p+Au vs. Au+Au: Comparison helps to quantify the CNM
> > effect" -
> > I don't think I understand how we quantify CNM effects by the
> > comparison ?
> > Cheers,
> > Barbara
> > On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 8:36 AM Yi Yang <yiyang0429 AT gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > Hi Nihar.
> > I don't have any further comments, thanks a lot.
> > Cheers,
> > Yi
> > On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 1:20 PM Nihar Sahoo
> > <nihar AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov> wrote:
> > Hello Barbara and Yi,
> > Thank you for your fine tuning comments and suggestions. I
>  have
>
> > implemented those.
>
> https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdrupal.star.bnl.gov%2FSTAR%2Fpresentations%2FQWG-2024%2FRecent-heavy-flavor-results-heavy-ion-collisions-STAR&data=05%7C02%7Cisaac.mooney%40yale.edu%7C07082711566c4236701908dc34585499%7Cdd8cbebb21394df8b4114e3e87abeb5c%7C0%7C0%7C638442801192560288%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=Rb3al0Zekg6h2xQMBK%2FFtHRj3IAA%2Bk2h3I%2FgzQNdjac%3D&reserved=0
> [1]
>
> > Barbara's following comment:
> > s6: I would remove this slide and add the new polarization
> > results,
> > I know you and Rongrong suggested me to include new Jpsi
> > polarization
> > results, but I find my self a bit uncomfortable to include
>  that
>
> > result
> > and also time constraint to explain the result. So I would
>  prefer
>
> > not
> > to include. Nasim is presenting pp published results.
> > Thank you
> > Nihar
> > On 2024-02-23 08:39, Yi Yang wrote:
> > Hi Nihar,
> > Thanks a lot for the updated version. I agree with Barbara's
> > additional comments.
> > Cheers,
> > Yi
> > On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 6:33 PM Nihar Sahoo
> > <nihar AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>
> > wrote:
> > Hello Yi,
> > Thank you for your comments. I have implemented all your
>  comments
>
> > > and
> > > modified my slides a bit in version-2.
>
> https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdrupal.star.bnl.gov%2FSTAR%2Fpresentations%2FQWG-2024%2FRecent-heavy-flavor-results-heavy-ion-collisions-STAR&data=05%7C02%7Cisaac.mooney%40yale.edu%7C07082711566c4236701908dc34585499%7Cdd8cbebb21394df8b4114e3e87abeb5c%7C0%7C0%7C638442801192565137%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=GERtFM3AnfzgnwBEW45QZk3IoHFQTsf8LH3Dj29yBPg%3D&reserved=0
> [1]
>
> > Please have a look.
> > Thank you
> > Nihar
> > On 2024-02-22 08:50, Yi Yang wrote:
> > Hi Nihar,
> > Thanks a lot for the nice slides.
> > I have some minor suggestions on v1 for your consideration.
> > - page 2: baryon density QCD medium --> baryon density in
>  QCD
>
> > medium
> > I would indicate ccbar is J/psi and bbbar is
> > Upsilon
> > (probably everyone knows that)
> > - page 6: The reference should be "Phys. Lett. B797 (2019)
> > 134917"
> > (the one you put is for RpAu)
> > - page 8: Probably you can also consider to show
>  Ziyue/Te-Chuan's
>
> > new
> > results here since it still slightly improves the
>  statistics
>
> > in
> > high
> > pT.
> > - page 10: I would show the Psi(2S) signal (mass plot)
>  instead
>
> > of
> > the
> > thermometer on the right, but just a suggestion.
> > - page 15 and 16: It would be good to indicate 200 GeV
>  collision
>
> > energy
> > I understand you only have 15 mins, but I would think
>  adding
>
> > Upsilon
> > in isobar and J/psi at very low pT would be good in the
>  talk.
>
> > Cheers,
> > Yi
> > On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 1:12 AM Nihar Sahoo via Star-hp-l
> > <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
> > Hello Barbara and Rongrong,
> > Thank you two for your nice comments.
> > Based on your comments and suggestion, I modified and
>  restructured
>
> > > my
> > > presentation.
> > > This is a 15min presentation; a few topics I do not add
>  due
>
> > to
> > time
> > constraint.
>
> https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdrupal.star.bnl.gov%2FSTAR%2Fpresentations%2FQWG-2024%2FRecent-heavy-flavor-results-heavy-ion-collisions-STAR&data=05%7C02%7Cisaac.mooney%40yale.edu%7C07082711566c4236701908dc34585499%7Cdd8cbebb21394df8b4114e3e87abeb5c%7C0%7C0%7C638442801192569617%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=%2FRC6Ft%2F3VIqLcuzHnV1ERLiU1IzB%2BCNMJ8r7xyg5hco%3D&reserved=0
> [1]
>
> > Please have a look.
> > Thank you
> > Nihar
> > On 2024-02-21 03:51, Barbara Trzeciak wrote:
> > Hi Nihar,
> > Please find below a few comments from my side.
> > - Add references to the published results
> > - s2: Following up on Rongrong's comment, I would even
>  remove
>
> > the
> > thermometer picture from there. We know it's a very
>  simplified
>
> > picture, and I don't think it's needed for this expert
>  audience.
>
> > By the QGP thermalization I guess you mean the QGP
>  temperature.
>
> > But
> > again, one needs to be careful here, it's not only the
>  static
>
> > Debye
> > screening but the dynamical processes play a role.
> > And instead of the heavy flavor motivation that you have
>  now,
>
> > you
> > can
> > say here that there are different process that influence
> > quarkonium
> > production: dissociation (both static and dynamical),
>  regeneration
>
> > +
> > cold nuclear matter effects
> > - s9: remove "Smaller charm production rate at RHIC"
> > - s10: Title: I guess you want to emphasise here isobar
>  collision
>
> > results - I would change the title. The Au+Au results you
>  either
>
> > show
> > on the previous slides or are already old.
> > And I would add here (or add a slide before this one)
>  motivating
>
> > studies in smaller isobar collisions, e.g.: study
>  dependence
>
> > of
> > hot
> > nuclear medium effects on medium size and energy density.
> > And I would use here a simpler plot that we have, without
>  the
>
> > LHC
> > data.
> > - s10: "or/and charm flow in QGP at RHIC" - you mean no
>  or
>
> > small
> > flow
> > ?
> > - s11: I would suggest adding the J/psi polarization in
>  isobar
>
> > collisions. If you don't have time, I think it might be
>  more
>
> > interesting in this workshop than the rho00 result.
> > - s12: suppression in heavy-ion collisions- > sequential
> > suppression
> > in heavy-ion collisions at RHIC
> > - s12: remove "Confirms QGP thermalization and Debye
>  screening
>
> > in
> > QGP", I suggest "QGP thermal properties"
> > - I'm not sure what you want to say with the second
>  bullet,
>
> > it's
> > quite
> > generic statement
> > Cheers,
> > Barbara
> > On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 10:19 PM Ma, Rongrong via
>  Star-hp-l
>
> > <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
> > Hello Nihar
> > Thanks for updating your slides. I have few more
>  comments
>
> > for
> > your
> > consideration:
> > Slide 1: change the title to "Recent quarkonium results
>  in
>
> > ..."
> > Slide 2:
> > - here you show the thermometer picture and mention "
>  Debye
>
> > screening". However, you do not really explain what they
>  are.
>
> > The
> > second bullet reads more like an open HF introduction.
> > - Given the realization of imaginary part of the
>  potential,
>
> > I
> > think
> > it is better to say dissociation in general, which
>  includes
>
> > both
> > static ("Debye screening") and dynamic processes. At
>  least,
>
> > you
> > should mention dynamical dissociation along with Debye
>  screening.
>
> > - Throughout the presentation, you mention a few times
>  about
>
> > "QGP
> > thermalization". Could you elaborate how one connects
>  quarkonium
>
> > suppression with QGP thermalization?
> > - For Nasim's talk, I think it is better to be titled
>  "quarkonia
>
> > in
> > p+p"
> > - I think QGP usually stands for Quark-Gluon Plasma
> > Slide 3:
> > - since you do not show any open HF results, I do not
>  think
>
> > you
> > need
> > the HFT picture
> > - Forward Silicon Track -> FST
> > - Forward EMCal and HCal -> FCS
> > Slide 8
> > - This slide reads like an introduction slide for
>  quarkonia,
>
> > which
> > should be moved to slide 2?
> > - charm quark dissociation -> quarkonia dissociation
> > Slide 9: I feel this slide should go together with slide
>  4
>
> > which
> > also discusses about energy dependence
> > Slide 10: it is not clear what you want to say about the
>  left
>
> > figure. The energy dependence has been discussed
>  earlier.
>
> > If
> > you
> > want to focus on the system size dependence, I have a
>  version
>
> > of
> > the
> > figure with only 200 GeV collision systems:
>
> https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdrupal.star.bnl.gov%2FSTAR%2Fsystem%2Ffiles%2FJpsi_Isobar_AuAu.pdf&data=05%7C02%7Cisaac.mooney%40yale.edu
> [7]%7C07082711566c4236701908dc34585499%7Cdd8cbebb21394df8b4114e3e87abeb5c%7C0%7C0%7C638442801192573996%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=MZ7ut7RR7kn8TmZZYNPsouItWithr2af9b9ieIT4sZk%3D&reserved=0.
>
> > Also it is probably better to split this slide into two.
> > Slide 11: our vector meson spin alignment paper
>  concluded
>
> > that
> > the
> > QGP's global angular momentum, as observed in Lambda
>  polarization,
>
> > > actually contributes very little to the observed vector
>  meson
>
> > spin
> > alignment. One possible origin is the strong force
>  field,
>
> > which
> > applies to phi meson and should also apply to Jpsi. This
>  is
>
> > a
> > main
> > motivation to measure Jpsi spin alignment, I think.
> > Best
> > Rongrong
> > On Feb 17, 2024, at 1:50 PM, Nihar Sahoo
>  <nihar AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>
>
> > > wrote:
> > > Hello Rongrong,
> > > Yes, you are correct. I was diverted a bit from the
>  theme
>
> > of
> > this
> > workshop.
> > Ok, I corrected those with a discussion of J/psi RAA and
>  v2
>
> > from
> > Isobar.
>
> https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdrupal.star.bnl.gov%2FSTAR%2Fpresentations%2FQWG-2024%2FRecent-heavy-flavor-results-heavy-ion-collisions-STAR&data=05%7C02%7Cisaac.mooney%40yale.edu%7C07082711566c4236701908dc34585499%7Cdd8cbebb21394df8b4114e3e87abeb5c%7C0%7C0%7C638442801192577815%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=UHdDyBmeghJiOel%2BjW6FixI1MhbQuKPwHr5avJWUjGU%3D&reserved=0
> [1]
>
> > Please have a look.
> > Thank you
> > Nihar
> > On 2024-02-16 22:14, Ma, Rongrong wrote:
> > Hello Nihar
> > The invitation is intended for presenting recent
>  quarkonium
>
> > results
> > in
> > heavy-ion collisions at STAR since it is a quarkonium
>  workshop.
>
> > So,
> > I
> > think it is probably not so relevant to present open HF
>  results
>
> > (slides 9-11). Instead, you can consider talking about
>  Jpsi
>
> > and
> > Upsilon Raa, Jpsi v2, Jpsi polarization in Isobar, for
>  example.
>
> > Thanks.
> > Best
> > Rongrong
> > On Feb 14, 2024, at 5:33 AM, Nihar Sahoo via Star-hp-l
> > <Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
> > Hello HP-pwg,
> > This is an invited talk from startalk to present at
>  QWG2024
>
> > at
> > Mohali, India, on "Recent heavy flavor results in heavy
>  ion
>
> > collisions at STAR".
> > It would be great to have comment/feedback from hp-pwg.
>  Please
>
> > have
> > a look.
> > Thank you
> > Nihar
> > On 2024-02-14 15:57, webmaster--- via Star-talks-l
>  wrote:
>
> > Dear star-talks-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
> > Nihar Sahoo (nihar AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov) has submitted a
>  material
>
> > for
> > a
> > review,
> > please have a look:
> https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdrupal.star.bnl.gov%2FSTAR%2Fnode%2F66782&data=05%7C02%7Cisaac.mooney%40yale.edu%7C07082711566c4236701908dc34585499%7Cdd8cbebb21394df8b4114e3e87abeb5c%7C0%7C0%7C638442801192581943%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=jE67BCOrmSd6FcAHfH64EE8TB9rndhqPZwun7WOmvTk%3D&reserved=0
> > [3]
> > Deadline: 2024-02-26
> > ---
> > If you have any problems with the review process, please
>  contact
>
> >
> webmaster@https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.star.bnl.gov%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cisaac.mooney%40yale.edu%7C07082711566c4236701908dc34585499%7Cdd8cbebb21394df8b4114e3e87abeb5c%7C0%7C0%7C638442801192585607%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=fUCafFOD2A2mKpjDM1%2F9FewgXoZDufj%2FBmXerou3D7o%3D&reserved=0
> > [4]
> > _______________________________________________
> > Star-talks-l mailing list
> > Star-talks-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.bnl.gov%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fstar-talks-l&data=05%7C02%7Cisaac.mooney%40yale.edu%7C07082711566c4236701908dc34585499%7Cdd8cbebb21394df8b4114e3e87abeb5c%7C0%7C0%7C638442801192589206%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=TPgysuxP2g%2BuI2tfzJ7VhuaIgvqCxEAvvIqqfw8ZO0U%3D&reserved=0
> > [5]
> > _______________________________________________
> > Star-hp-l mailing list
> > Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.bnl.gov%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fstar-hp-l&data=05%7C02%7Cisaac.mooney%40yale.edu%7C07082711566c4236701908dc34585499%7Cdd8cbebb21394df8b4114e3e87abeb5c%7C0%7C0%7C638442801192593086%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=NVoj1RztgC9u8SxqLuWTJ16BM81aaBtm42aJgfs%2Fq54%3D&reserved=0
> > [6]
> > _______________________________________________
> > Star-hp-l mailing list
> > Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.bnl.gov%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fstar-hp-l&data=05%7C02%7Cisaac.mooney%40yale.edu%7C07082711566c4236701908dc34585499%7Cdd8cbebb21394df8b4114e3e87abeb5c%7C0%7C0%7C638442801192596909%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=49m%2FYakFUt8rmI8090CdE4jmTi6kVi4puS%2BVrNr6oNw%3D&reserved=0
> > [6]
>  _______________________________________________
> Star-hp-l mailing list
> Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.bnl.gov%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fstar-hp-l&data=05%7C02%7Cisaac.mooney%40yale.edu%7C07082711566c4236701908dc34585499%7Cdd8cbebb21394df8b4114e3e87abeb5c%7C0%7C0%7C638442801192600801%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=akHnWYONjFEZbM9JrAI8PIihDjoCXSV5XZeDtevCDmE%3D&reserved=0
> [6]
>  Links:
> ------
> [1]
>
> https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Furldefense.com%2Fv3%2F__https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fpdf%2F2110.09666.pdf__%3B!!P4SdNyxKAPE!EJfrInMeD1SK8gxBDi0zcozzKgUPn_GUi4buGgNggpxynAUCxZh0czYiiXAMj9XI76zlqQ_iow8FTfdYXjOOLmtlaeU-p8g%24&data=05%7C02%7Cisaac.mooney%40yale.edu%7C07082711566c4236701908dc34585499%7Cdd8cbebb21394df8b4114e3e87abeb5c%7C0%7C0%7C638442801192604629%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=WhCF0lDmM01E5Oeg8rLxOxPrfupmlQv3UVdll2nnhmk%3D&reserved=0
> [8]
> Links:
> ------
> [1]
> https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Furldefense.com%2Fv3%2F__https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fpdf%2F2110.09666.pdf__%3B!!P4SdNyxKAPE!FsavuOSiEnfhDexVYQo3H9s4mlRI4INCzi7iknyK0IOpRs2AiMGP5Eh9LgFctVP1tXxYkPo1zeHwl_bXTMsEnGch_nxVOO0%24&data=05%7C02%7Cisaac.mooney%40yale.edu%7C07082711566c4236701908dc34585499%7Cdd8cbebb21394df8b4114e3e87abeb5c%7C0%7C0%7C638442801192608966%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=eBO12qrJxu5lhmGGIrwsaRoV20Zbona83BYvvrpuJ9U%3D&reserved=0
> [9]
>  _______________________________________________
> Star-hp-l mailing list
> Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.bnl.gov%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fstar-hp-l&data=05%7C02%7Cisaac.mooney%40yale.edu%7C07082711566c4236701908dc34585499%7Cdd8cbebb21394df8b4114e3e87abeb5c%7C0%7C0%7C638442801192612761%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=7Z%2BG3We%2BiNRZCYA8A9jsedswPHcc%2FuvKushd%2FcwGGng%3D&reserved=0
> [6]
>
>
> Links:
> ------
> [1] 
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/presentations/QWG-2024/Recent-heavy-flavor-results-heavy-ion-collisions-STAR
> [2] 
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://arxiv.org/pdf/2110.09666.pdf__;!!P4SdNyxKAPE!Ff-We7J6aFygxPoFX9HwoUUSoBzXGr-5k4bcPHaH_W-AB2X8cnaYw89MMT0ygCH9p10oiBRKCJ77_G3SjmPRR6tZcELP$
> [3] https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/66782
> [4] http://www.star.bnl.gov/
> [5] https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-talks-l
> [6] https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l
> [7] https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/Jpsi_Isobar_AuAu.pdf
> [8] 
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://arxiv.org/pdf/2110.09666.pdf__;!!P4SdNyxKAPE!EJfrInMeD1SK8gxBDi0zcozzKgUPn_GUi4buGgNggpxynAUCxZh0czYiiXAMj9XI76zlqQ_iow8FTfdYXjOOLmtlaeU-p8g$
> [9] 
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://arxiv.org/pdf/2110.09666.pdf__;!!P4SdNyxKAPE!FsavuOSiEnfhDexVYQo3H9s4mlRI4INCzi7iknyK0IOpRs2AiMGP5Eh9LgFctVP1tXxYkPo1zeHwl_bXTMsEnGch_nxVOO0$