STAR HardProbes PWG

[Nihar Sahoo <nihar AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>]

Hello Andrew,

Thank you for your nice slides, Please find my comments below.

General:
_You have not discussed track and event selection, dataset. Etc
_ also need to discuss jet selection and jet recon information for this 
analysis


Slide2:
You could mention kinematic coverage of TPC and BEMC like eta, pT , etc 
range

Slide3:
_ this EEC definition does not include charge into consideration. Like 
your previous preliminary request : (slide5 of
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/Preliminary_Request_6_20_24.pdf 
)
_ Please make it consistent if this is what you have used in this 
analysis.

Slide5:
Is this an updated final plot using new embedding that will go to paper 
draft?

Slide6:
_As location of transition… -> this bullet is not clear, please rephrase 
it

Slide7:
_…has direct dependence on alpha_s -> Provide references
_ Mention how do you define EEEC, similar expression as EEC

Slide8:
_Shows movement of transition region withjet momentum -> The trend does 
not show the same especially for 30-50 GeV/c case.
What is the “transition region” in this case?

Slide17-21:
There are already lot of material for this talk.
Better to reduce these slides to one slide just to motivate your plan 
for heavy-ion collisions analysis.
Otherwise, audience will be lost.

Conclusion slide:
It is not clear what is the main physics message from this analysis?

Best
Nihar






On 2024-09-10 23:07, webmaster AT star.bnl.gov wrote:
> Dear Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
>
> Andrew Tamis (andrew.tamis AT yale.edu) has submitted a material for a 
> review,
> please have a look:
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/68886
>
> Deadline: 2024-09-22
> ---
> If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
> webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov