STAR HardProbes PWG

["Mooney, Isaac" <isaac.mooney AT yale.edu>]

Hi all,

Below is our list of proposed abstracts taking into account feedback at the PWG and management levels. Thanks for your comments and suggestions throughout the process. For those who submitted abstract proposals for talks which are now being merged, please work together and upload a merged abstract for the combined talk to drupal at your earliest convenience. Additionally, if you want to submit your individual work as a poster as well, please also upload that abstract to drupal. Let us know if you have any questions.

Best,

Isaac, Nihar, and Qian

10 talks:

Unmerged:

2. Youqi Song - STUDYING NON-PERTURBATIVE QCD WITH JET SUBSTRUCTURE MEASUREMENTS IN pp COLLISIONS AT sqrt{s}= 200 GEV AT STAR

3. Dandan Shen, Li Yi, and Qian Yang - Measurement of J/Psi energy correlator in p+p collisions at sqrt(S_NN )= 500 GeV at STAR

4. Nihar Sahoo - Jet acoplanarity in Au+Au and p+p collisions

6. Veronika Prozorova - Heavy-flavor electron production in Au+Au collisions at 54.4 GeV

10. Gabe Dale-Gau - Measurements of Baryon-to-Meson Ratios Inside Jets in Au+Au and p+p Collisions at sqrt{s_NN} = 200 GeV at STAR

13. Andrew Tamis - Measurement of N-Point Energy Correlators in Heavy-Ion Collisions at STAR

Merged:

(1) + (9)

(5) + (7)

(8) + (11)

(12) + (14)

*Generalized angularities in AuAu:

1. Tanmay Pani - Observing jet quenching using generalized jet angularities in Au+Au collisions at sqrt{s_NN} = 200 GeV from STAR

9. Ondrej Lomicky - Measurement of D0 Meson Tagged Jet Generalized Angularities in Au+Au Collisions at 200 GeV at STAR

*Jet yields in medium-to-large systems:

5. Yang He - Semi-inclusive hadron+jet measurement in Ru+Ru and Zr+Zr collisions at sqrt{s_NN} = 200 GeV by STAR

        7. Michal Svoboda - Measurement of inclusive jet production in central and peripheral Au+Au collisions at sqrt{s_NN} = 200 GeV

*Oxygen-oxygen jets and high-pT hadrons:

8. Sijie Zhang - Semi-inclusive hadron+jet and inclusive jet measurements in O+O collisions at 200 GeV

11. Maowu Nie - System size dependence of high-pt hadron yield modification with sqrt{s_NN} =200 GeV O+O collisions at STAR

*Accessing path-length dependence of E-loss:

12. Isaac Mooney - Event-shape engineering of high-momentum probes in Au+Au collisions at sqrt{s_NN} = 200 GeV at STAR

14. Sooraj Radhakrishnan, Subhash Singha, Nihar Sahoo - Measurement of inclusive jet v1 to study the path length dependece of parton energy loss in Au+Au and isobar collisions at sqrt{s_NN} = 200 GeV by STAR

On Oct 28, 2024, at 13:53, Mooney, Isaac <isaac.mooney AT yale.edu> wrote:

Hi working group members,

Sorry to keep you waiting to see the final list of merged abstracts. We discussed our proposed final list at the convener-management meeting (taking the feedback from this email chain and a previous PWGC meeting into consideration) on Friday, and they had a few additional comments, which required some follow-up discussion with PAs. We’ve now heard back from them, and will send you all the finalized list tonight or tomorrow. By the way, it was also mentioned that a two-week extension of the abstract submission deadline would be requested by STAR, but I haven’t heard any news about this yet.

Gabe, to your question specifically: in our proposed final list from Friday, we did not advocate for merging abstracts 10 and 13 and in the meetings with management they did not recommend changing that. So I think it is safe to assume you can upload separate abstracts to drupal.

Thanks,

Isaac, Nihar, and Qian

On Oct 28, 2024, at 12:52, Gabe Dale-Gau <gdaleg2 AT uic.edu> wrote:

Dear Conveners,

Just checking in on this merging conversation. Has there been a final decision on whether or not to merge abstracts 10 and 13 (Baryon/Meson ratios and EECs)?

From the analyzer's side, we still strongly feel that they should not be merged. However, I do not want to proceed with official submission to dupal per Sooraj's recent email until we have approval to proceed separately from you.

Thanks,

Gabe

On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 8:17 PM Evdokimov, Olga <evdolga AT uic.edu> wrote:

Dear All,

Many thanks  to Jana and Helen for bringing up the point about proposed merger of abstracts 10 and 13. Unfortunately, I was not able to  attend the meeting  today and hear any rationale behind this move. From the UIC analysis team side - we most strongly oppose this proposal seeing no overlap in physics message, techniques, or anything else but the word “jet.”

Best regards,

Olga

---

From: star-hp-l-request AT lists.bnl.gov <star-hp-l-request AT lists.bnl.gov> on behalf of Helen Caines <helen.caines AT yale.edu>
Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2024 5:43:02 PM
To: star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Subject: Re: [[Star-hp-l] ] HP-PWG meeting Oct. 17, 10 AM BNL time + QM merging

 

CAUTION: External Sender

Hi All,

Sorry to chime in late too, but I would like to echo Jana’s question on the rational behind merging the B/M ratios (10) in jets and the EEC abstract (13).

Maybe I am missing something but I don’t see how these two topics can be discussed  in a 15 min talk and have a coherent uniting physics message across the two analyses. I understand the desire to not submit too many abstracts, but we also need to be clear what the overarching physics message of each abstract will be so the speaker can tell a good story. Some of the worst QM talks occur when collaborations try to merge too many analyses with differing focuses in one talk.

Helen


Sent from my iPad

> On Oct 17, 2024, at 1:14 PM, Bielčíková Jana <bielcikova AT ujf.cas.cz> wrote:
>
>  Btw, what is the rationale behind combining B/M ratios in jets (10) with correlators (13)?

This email originated from outside the University of Illinois System. Use caution when replying, clicking links, or opening attachments. DO NOT reply to any requests asking you to reply from a personal account or SMS.